IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v50y2016i1p177-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to classify political cultures? A comparison of three methods of classification

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Denk
  • Henrik Christensen

Abstract

To study the composition of political cultures, it is necessary to classify citizens according to a theoretical typology of political subcultures. Different methods of classification have been used for confronting this challenge, but the choice of method is rarely discussed in any detail because most studies apply a method without considering implications or possible alternatives. This is unfortunate because the choice of method has important consequences for the ensuing results. With this article, we aim to determine the implications of different methods for classification and hereby call attention to the importance of this choice for comparative research on political culture. We compare three commonly used methods of classification: critical thresholds, factor analysis and cluster analysis. These methods are used for classifying respondents from the 2008 European Social Survey according to a typology of political subcultures. Based on empirical analyses, we conclude that: (a) the choice of method of classification affects the outcome of the analysis, (b) cluster analysis and factor analysis may result in classifications that do not adequately reflect the theoretical typology, and (c) cluster analysis and factor analysis provide classifications that differ depending on analytical level. While the results do not show that either method is inherently superior, they clearly demonstrate that the choice of method should be recognized as a critical part of the research process. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Denk & Henrik Christensen, 2016. "How to classify political cultures? A comparison of three methods of classification," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 177-191, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:50:y:2016:i:1:p:177-191
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-014-0143-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-014-0143-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-014-0143-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Inglehart, Ronald, 1988. "The Renaissance of Political Culture," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 82(4), pages 1203-1230, December.
    2. Street, John, 1994. "Political Culture–from Civic Culture to Mass Culture," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(1), pages 95-113, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexander P. Martin, 2021. "A mixed-methods assessment of civil political culture during a democratic transition. The case of Tunisian civil society organisations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 2189-2218, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tausch, Arno, 2018. "The return of religious Antisemitism? The evidence from World Values Survey data," MPRA Paper 90093, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Easterlin, Richard A. & Angelescu McVey, Laura & Switek, Maggie & Sawangfa, Onnicha & Zweig, Jacqueline Smith, 2011. "The Happiness-Income Paradox Revisited," IZA Discussion Papers 5799, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. repec:gig:joupla:v:3:y:2011:i:1:p:29-64 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Fuchs, Dieter, 1998. "The political culture of unified Germany," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Institutions and Social Change FS III 98-204, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    5. Axel Dreher & Martin Gassebner & Lars-H. R. Siemers, 2012. "Globalization, Economic Freedom, and Human Rights," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 56(3), pages 516-546, June.
    6. Arno Tausch, 2019. "Multivariate analyses of the global acceptability rates of male intimate partner violence (IPV) against women based on World Values Survey data," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 1155-1194, October.
    7. Xu, Xu & Jin, Xin, 2018. "The autocratic roots of social distrust," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 362-380.
    8. Paul Rich, 1999. "American Voluntarism, Social Capital, and Political Culture," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 565(1), pages 15-34, September.
    9. Robbert Maseland & André Hoorn, 2011. "Why Muslims like democracy yet have so little of it," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 481-496, June.
    10. Tausch, Arno, 2018. "Africa on the maps of global values. Comparative analyses, based on recent World Values Survey data," MPRA Paper 87966, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Guillermo Merelo, 2017. "Neither Here nor There, I Do Not Vote and I Do Not Care: The External Electoral Participation of Mexican Migrants in New Zealand," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 641-656, May.
    12. John S. Robey, 1999. "Civil Society and NAFTA: Initial Results," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 565(1), pages 113-125, September.
    13. Fabio Sabatini, 2004. "Il rapporto tra Economia e Società nella ricerca sul capitale sociale. Un tentativo di impostazione contabile e una classificazione “funzionale” della letteratura," Others 0411005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Tim Friehe & Helge Mueller & Florian Neumeier, 2017. "Media content's role in the making of a democrat: Evidence from East Germany," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201711, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    15. Alberto Melo, 2003. "Colombia: Los problemas de competitividad de un país en conflicto," Research Department Publications 1002, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    16. David Soto Oñate, 2017. "On the Cultural Legacy of Political Institutions: Evidence from the Spanish Regions," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 221(2), pages 47-82, June.
    17. Benno Torgler & Friedrich Schneider, 2007. "What Shapes Attitudes Toward Paying Taxes? Evidence from Multicultural European Countries," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 88(2), pages 443-470, June.
    18. Alejandro Milcíades Peña, 2018. "The politics of resonance: Transnational sustainability governance in Argentina," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 150-170, March.
    19. repec:gig:joupla:v:3:y:2011:i:2:p:73-105 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. repec:got:cegedp:115 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Cristina Acedo-Carmona & Antoni Gomila, 2014. "Personal Trust Increases Cooperation beyond General Trust," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-10, August.
    22. Nectarios Oudeniotis & George O. Tsobanoglou, 2022. "Interorganizational Cooperation and Social Capital Formation among Social Enterprises and Social Economy Organizations: A Case Study from the Region of Attica, Greece," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    23. Marc Morjé Howard & Leah Gilbert, 2008. "A Cross‐National Comparison of the Internal Effects of Participation in Voluntary Organizations," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(1), pages 12-32, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:50:y:2016:i:1:p:177-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.