IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v40y2006i3p315-329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Generalizability Theory to Assess the Validity of the Evaluation Process

Author

Listed:
  • Salvador Moscoso
  • Francisco Tello
  • José López

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Salvador Moscoso & Francisco Tello & José López, 2006. "Using Generalizability Theory to Assess the Validity of the Evaluation Process," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 315-329, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:40:y:2006:i:3:p:315-329
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-005-1102-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-005-1102-9
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-005-1102-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patton, Michael Quinn, 1989. "A context and boundaries for a theory-driven approach to validity," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 375-377, January.
    2. Shapiro, Jonathan Z., 1989. "Contextual limits on validity attainment: An artificial science perspective on program evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 367-374, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carol H. Weiss, 1997. "How Can Theory-Based Evaluation Make Greater Headway?," Evaluation Review, , vol. 21(4), pages 501-524, August.
    2. Downes, Jenni & Gullickson, Amy M., 2022. "What does it mean for an evaluation to be ‘valid’? A critical synthesis of evaluation literature," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:40:y:2006:i:3:p:315-329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.