IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v39y1974i1p69-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of random error and subsampling of dimensions on recovery of configurations by non-metric multidimensional scaling

Author

Listed:
  • Harvey Cohen
  • Lawrence Jones

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Harvey Cohen & Lawrence Jones, 1974. "The effects of random error and subsampling of dimensions on recovery of configurations by non-metric multidimensional scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(1), pages 69-90, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:39:y:1974:i:1:p:69-90
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02291578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02291578
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02291578?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Carroll & Jih-Jie Chang, 1970. "Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(3), pages 283-319, September.
    2. Ledyard Tucker, 1972. "Relations between multidimensional scaling and three-mode factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 3-27, March.
    3. J. Ramsay, 1969. "Some statistical considerations in multidimensional scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 34(2), pages 167-182, June.
    4. C. Horan, 1969. "Multidimensional scaling: Combining observations when individuals have different perceptual structures," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 34(2), pages 139-165, June.
    5. David Klahr, 1969. "A monte carlo investigation of the statistical significance of Kruskal's nonmetric scaling procedure," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 34(3), pages 319-330, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. George Barnett & Joseph Woelfel, 1979. "On the dimensionality of psychological processes," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 215-232, June.
    2. S. Hess & E. Suárez & J. Camacho & G. Ramírez & B. Hernández, 2001. "Reliability of Coordinates Obtained by MINISSA Concerning the Order of Presented Stimuli," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 117-128, May.
    3. Michael C. Hout & Corbin A. Cunningham & Arryn Robbins & Justin MacDonald, 2018. "Simulating the Fidelity of Data for Large Stimulus Set Sizes and Variable Dimension Estimation in Multidimensional Scaling," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, April.
    4. Ana-Delia Correa & José Díaz & Ernesto Suárez & Bernardo Hernández, 1993. "Multidimensional scaling reliability in similarity judgments about environmental sentences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 201-209, May.
    5. Robert Baker & Forrest Young, 1975. "A note on an empirical evaluation of the isis procedure," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 40(3), pages 413-415, September.
    6. Rolf Langeheine, 1982. "Statistical evaluation of measures of fit in the Lingoes-Borg procrustean individual differences scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 47(4), pages 427-442, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yoshio Takane & Forrest Young & Jan Leeuw, 1977. "Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(1), pages 7-67, March.
    2. Robert MacCallum & Edwin Cornelius, 1977. "A monte carlo investigation of recovery of structure by alscal," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(3), pages 401-428, September.
    3. Dawn Iacobucci & Doug Grisaffe & Wayne DeSarbo, 2017. "Statistical perceptual maps: using confidence region ellipses to enhance the interpretations of brand positions in multidimensional scaling," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(3), pages 81-98, December.
    4. Mariela González-Narváez & María José Fernández-Gómez & Susana Mendes & José-Luis Molina & Omar Ruiz-Barzola & Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2021. "Study of Temporal Variations in Species–Environment Association through an Innovative Multivariate Method: MixSTATICO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    5. Ingwer Borg & James Lingoes, 1978. "What weight should weights have in individual differences scaling?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 223-237, September.
    6. Giuseppe Bove & Akinori Okada, 2018. "Methods for the analysis of asymmetric pairwise relationships," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 12(1), pages 5-31, March.
    7. Richard Harshman & Margaret Lundy, 1996. "Uniqueness proof for a family of models sharing features of Tucker's three-mode factor analysis and PARAFAC/candecomp," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages 133-154, March.
    8. J. Carroll, 1985. "Review," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 133-140, March.
    9. Warren Torgerson, 1986. "Scaling and Psychometrika: Spatial and alternative representations of similarity data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(1), pages 57-63, March.
    10. Jacqueline Meulman & Peter Verboon, 1993. "Points of view analysis revisited: Fitting multidimensional structures to optimal distance components with cluster restrictions on the variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 7-35, March.
    11. Pacifico, Antonio, 2020. "Bayesian Fuzzy Clustering with Robust Weighted Distance for Multiple ARIMA and Multivariate Time-Series," MPRA Paper 104379, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Henk Kiers, 1991. "Hierarchical relations among three-way methods," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(3), pages 449-470, September.
    13. Willem Kloot & Pieter Kroonenberg, 1985. "External analysis with three-mode principal component models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 479-494, December.
    14. W. Alan Nicewander & Joseph Lee Rodgers, 2022. "Obituary: Bruce McArthur Bloxom 1938–2020," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 1042-1044, September.
    15. Jan Leeuw & Sandra Pruzansky, 1978. "A new computational method to fit the weighted euclidean distance model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(4), pages 479-490, December.
    16. J. Carroll, 1976. "Spatial, non-spatial and hybrid models for scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 41(4), pages 439-463, December.
    17. Jámbor, Attila & Kovács, Sándor & Somai, Miklós, 2016. "Tíz év az Európai Unióban - az új tagországok agrárteljesítményei [A decade in the EU: the agricultural performances of the new member-states]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 260-284.
    18. James Lingoes & Ingwer Borg, 1978. "A direct approach to individual differences scaling using increasingly complex transformations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(4), pages 491-519, December.
    19. Zárraga Castro, María Amaya & Goitisolo Lezama, Beatriz, 2000. "factor analysis of a set of contingency tables," BILTOKI 1134-8984, Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Economía Aplicada III (Econometría y Estadística).
    20. Pieter Kroonenberg & Jan Leeuw, 1980. "Principal component analysis of three-mode data by means of alternating least squares algorithms," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(1), pages 69-97, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:39:y:1974:i:1:p:69-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.