IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v99y2019i1d10.1007_s11069-019-03739-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantification of source-to-site distance uncertainty in ground motion models

Author

Listed:
  • Saman Yaghmaei-Sabegh

    (University of Tabriz)

  • Mehdi Ebrahimi-Aghabagher

    (University of Tabriz)

Abstract

Among different input data, source-to-site distance plays a major role in the results of ground motion models (GMMs). In order to determine the source-to-site distance, geometric characteristics of the seismic source need to be specified. This can be challenging when the seismic source is not known thoroughly. Empirical relationships themselves which are used to determine the geometric characteristics of seismic sources contain large degree of uncertainty. In this paper, a simple algorithm based on Monte Carlo (MC) simulation method which quantifies the uncertainties in distance metric and geometric characteristics of seismic sources is proposed. The jointly effects of magnitude and distance are considered in the proposed algorithm for uncertainties modeling. Also, this algorithm has been used to quantified errors resulted from inputting inaccurate source-to-site distance metrics in the GMMs. NGA-West2 global GMMs and event-specific isotropic and non-isotropic GMMs are used in the analysis. The results demonstrate that the uncertainty in the measurement of different source-to-site distance definitions depends on the magnitude and on the location of site with respect to the seismic source. It is also observed that the distance measurement uncertainty has a direct effect on the outcomes of GMMs. GMMs’ coefficient of variation maps demonstrate that the amount of uncertainty is higher around the fault; for large magnitudes, outcome variation of GMMs reaches as high as 40% of the average predictions. The coefficient of variation in GMM results decreases with the increase in distance metrics considered where at a distance beyond 30 km, the coefficient of variation of GMM estimates drops from 40 to 10%.

Suggested Citation

  • Saman Yaghmaei-Sabegh & Mehdi Ebrahimi-Aghabagher, 2019. "Quantification of source-to-site distance uncertainty in ground motion models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(1), pages 287-306, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:99:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-019-03739-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-019-03739-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-019-03739-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-019-03739-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hing-Ho Tsang & Saman Yaghmaei-Sabegh & P. Anbazhagan & M. Neaz Sheikh, 2011. "A checking method for probabilistic seismic-hazard assessment: case studies on three cities," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 58(1), pages 67-84, July.
    2. Jessica Murray & Paul Segall, 2002. "Testing time-predictable earthquake recurrence by direct measurement of strain accumulation and release," Nature, Nature, vol. 419(6904), pages 287-291, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Hodge & Juliet Biggs & Katsuichiro Goda & Willy Aspinall, 2015. "Assessing infrequent large earthquakes using geomorphology and geodesy: the Malawi Rift," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 76(3), pages 1781-1806, April.
    2. William Mohanty & Akhilesh Verma, 2013. "Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Kakrapar atomic power station, Gujarat, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 919-952, October.
    3. Nilgün Sayıl, 2013. "Long-term earthquake prediction in western Anatolia with the time- and magnitude-predictable model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 66(2), pages 809-834, March.
    4. Saman Yaghmaei-Sabegh & Hongwei Wang, 2022. "Aftershock ground motion characteristics during the 2012 Varzaghan–Ahar doublet events, northwest of Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(3), pages 2579-2599, April.
    5. Chen, Chien-chih & Lee, Ya-Ting & Chang, Young-Fo, 2008. "A relationship between Hurst exponents of slip and waiting time data of earthquakes," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(18), pages 4643-4648.
    6. Priyanka Ghosh & Rajusha Kumari, 2012. "Seismic interference of two nearby horizontal strip anchors in layered soil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 63(2), pages 789-804, September.
    7. Greenwood, Priscilla E. & Schick, Anton & Wefelmeyer, Wolfgang, 2011. "Estimating the inter-arrival time density of Markov renewal processes under structural assumptions on the transition distribution," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 277-282, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:99:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-019-03739-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.