IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v83y2016i1d10.1007_s11069-016-2462-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integration of seismic and image data processing for rockfall monitoring and early warning along transportation networks

Author

Listed:
  • Panagiotis Partsinevelos

    (University Campus)

  • George Kritikakis

    (University Campus)

  • Nikos Economou

    (University Campus)

  • Zach Agioutantis

    (University of Kentucky)

  • Achilleas Tripolitsiotis

    (Space Geomatica Ltd)

  • Stelios Mertikas

    (University Campus)

  • Antonis Vafidis

    (University Campus)

Abstract

The occurrence of rockfall incidents on the transportation network may cause injuries, and even casualties, as well as severe damage to infrastructure such as dwellings, railways, road corridors, etc. Passive protective measures (i.e., rockfall barriers, wire nets, etc.) are mainly deployed by operators of ground transport networks to minimize the impact of detrimental effects on these networks. In conjunction with these passive measures, active rockfall monitoring should ideally include the magnitude of each rockfall, its initial and final position, and the triggering mechanism that might have caused its detachment from the slope. In this work, the operational principle of a low-cost rockfall monitoring and alerting system is being presented. The system integrates measurements from a multi-channel seismograph and commercial cameras as the primary equipment for event detection. A series of algorithms analyze these measurements independently in order to reduce alarms originated by surrounding noise and sources other than rockfall events. The detection methodology employs two different sets of algorithms: Time–frequency analyses of the rockfall event’s seismic signature are performed using moving window pattern recognition algorithms, whereas image processing techniques are utilized to deliver object detection and localization. Training and validation of the proposed approach was performed through field tests that involved manually induced rockfall events and recording of sources (i.e., passing car, walking people) that may cause a false alarm. These validation tests revealed that the seismic monitoring algorithms produce a 4.17 % false alarm rate with an accuracy of 93 %. Finally, the results of a 34-day operational monitoring period are presented and the ability of the imaging system to identify and exclude false alarms is discussed. The entire processing cycle is 10–15 s. Thus, it can be considered as a near real-time system for early warning of rockfall events.

Suggested Citation

  • Panagiotis Partsinevelos & George Kritikakis & Nikos Economou & Zach Agioutantis & Achilleas Tripolitsiotis & Stelios Mertikas & Antonis Vafidis, 2016. "Integration of seismic and image data processing for rockfall monitoring and early warning along transportation networks," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(1), pages 133-153, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:83:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-016-2462-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2462-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-016-2462-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-016-2462-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sättele, Martina & Bründl, Michael & Straub, Daniel, 2015. "Reliability and effectiveness of early warning systems for natural hazards: Concept and application to debris flow warning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 192-202.
    2. V. Coviello & M. Arattano & L. Turconi, 2015. "Detecting torrential processes from a distance with a seismic monitoring network," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(3), pages 2055-2080, September.
    3. K. Joyce & S. Samsonov & S. Levick & J. Engelbrecht & S. Belliss, 2014. "Mapping and monitoring geological hazards using optical, LiDAR, and synthetic aperture RADAR image data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(2), pages 137-163, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khakzad, Nima & Van Gelder, Pieter, 2018. "Vulnerability of industrial plants to flood-induced natechs: A Bayesian network approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 403-411.
    2. Lan, Meng & Zhu, Jiping & Lo, Siuming, 2021. "Hybrid Bayesian network-based landslide risk assessment method for modeling risk for industrial facilities subjected to landslides," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. Haibat Ali & Jae-ho Choi, 2019. "A Review of Underground Pipeline Leakage and Sinkhole Monitoring Methods Based on Wireless Sensor Networking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Xiang, Yanping, 2020. "Optimal early warning defense of N-version programming service against co-resident attacks in cloud system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:83:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-016-2462-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.