IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i13d10.1007_s11069-025-07423-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Severity of earthquake disasters triggered by MS≥5.0 events: retrospective analysis of 288 cases in China (1991–2020)

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng Miao

    (Ningxia Normal University
    Ningxia Normal University)

  • Mingtao Ding

    (Southwest Jiaotong University)

  • Jin’an Qiu

    (Guangdong Geological Disaster Prevention and Control Technology Center)

  • Jun Wang

    (Ministry of Natural Resources)

  • Jianbo Wu

    (Sichuan Geological Environment Survey and Research Center
    Sichuan Huadi Construction Engineering Co. Ltd)

  • Dong Sun

    (Sichuan Geological Environment Survey and Research Center
    Sichuan Huadi Construction Engineering Co. Ltd)

Abstract

The determination of earthquake disaster severity levels facilitates the assessment of loss degree and societal impact caused by earthquake disasters. Metrics such as affected population, fatalities, and direct economic losses are commonly used to quantify earthquake disaster severity. This study collects data on affected population, fatalities, and direct economic losses from MS≥5.0 seismic events in Chinese Mainland between 1991 and 2020. A computational model for earthquake disaster severity is applied to analyze the severity of 288 MS≥5.0 earthquake events over the 30-year period. Considering that the losses caused by each earthquake do not include all loss indicators, based on the overall analysis of earthquake disaster severity, this study discusses in detail the severity of earthquake disaster events with only a single loss index, dual loss index, and triple loss index, and compares their consistency with the severity of the entire earthquake disaster event. Key findings reveal that: the severity grading results of earthquake disasters with only a single loss indicator, earthquake disasters with dual loss indicators, and earthquake disasters with triple loss indicators are respectively reduced by 1–3 levels, reduced by 1–2 levels, and increased by 1–2 levels in the overall disaster severity grading results. It reveals that with the increase of earthquake loss indicators, the depth and breadth of the social impact of earthquake disasters have gone from being ignored to being overly concerned. Consequently, comprehensive earthquake disaster severity assessments require multi-dimensional analyses integrating both individual events and holistic frameworks. The findings provide technical support for post-disaster recovery and reconstruction planning in earthquake-affected regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng Miao & Mingtao Ding & Jin’an Qiu & Jun Wang & Jianbo Wu & Dong Sun, 2025. "Severity of earthquake disasters triggered by MS≥5.0 events: retrospective analysis of 288 cases in China (1991–2020)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(13), pages 15993-16011, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:13:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07423-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07423-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07423-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-025-07423-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. Jithamala Caldera & S. C. Wirasinghe, 2022. "A universal severity classification for natural disasters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(2), pages 1533-1573, March.
    2. Fahu Chen & Shengqian Chen & Xu Zhang & Jianhui Chen & Xin Wang & Evan J. Gowan & Mingrui Qiang & Guanghui Dong & Zongli Wang & Yuecong Li & Qinghai Xu & Yangyang Xu & John P. Smol & Jianbao Liu, 2020. "Asian dust-storm activity dominated by Chinese dynasty changes since 2000 BP," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-7, December.
    3. N. Zhang & H. Huang, 2018. "Assessment of world disaster severity processed by Gaussian blur based on large historical data: casualties as an evaluating indicator," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(1), pages 173-187, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Mackay & Astghik Mavisakalyan & Yashar Tarverdi, 2023. "Trust a few: natural disasters and the formation of trust in Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2023-143, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. YuBiao Hao & XueCheng Zhang, 2023. "The impact of environmental regulation on urban green output efficiency: evidence from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 5717-5735, June.
    3. Hongyan Dui & Kaixin Liu & Shaomin Wu, 2024. "Data-driven reliability and resilience measure of transportation systems considering disaster levels," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 340(1), pages 217-243, September.
    4. Riza Andrian Ibrahim & Sukono & Herlina Napitupulu & Rose Irnawaty Ibrahim, 2023. "How to Price Catastrophe Bonds for Sustainable Earthquake Funding? A Systematic Review of the Pricing Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Mackay, Robert & Mavisakalyan, Astghik & Tarverdi, Yashar, 2024. "Trust a few: Natural disasters and the disruption of trust in Africa," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    6. Wulan Anggraeni & Sudradjat Supian & Sukono & Nurfadhlina Binti Abdul Halim, 2022. "Earthquake Catastrophe Bond Pricing Using Extreme Value Theory: A Mini-Review Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-22, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:13:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07423-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.