Author
Listed:
- Jie Ma
(Xiuyan Manchu Autonomous County Meteorological Bureau)
- Peijuan Wang
(Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences)
- Rui Feng
(China Meteorological Administration)
- Yuanda Zhang
(Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences)
- Yang Li
(Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences)
- Qi Wang
(Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences)
- Dingrong Wu
(Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences)
- Yuping Ma
(Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences)
Abstract
As the most widely planted food crop in China, maize (Zea mays) often suffers drought stresses during its growing period, which further leads to substantial yield reducing and great economic losses. Therefore, timely and accurate monitoring of drought conditions is essential for maize production. In this paper, six widely used daily drought indices, including Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI10, SPI30) and Standardized Precipitation Evaporation Index (SPEI10, SPEI30) at 10-day and 30-day scales, Meteorological Drought Composite Index (MCI), and Crop Water Deficit Index (CWDI), were calculated by using meteorological data from 1971–2020. Maize drought disaster records were segmented into different maize growing periods in terms of maize phenophase data. The drought identification capacity of each drought index was evaluated by the multi-dimensionality, sensitivity and accuracy in four different maize producing regions of China, i.e., the North SPring maize region (NSP), the Huang-huai-hai SUmmer maize region (HSU), the South SPring maize region (SSP), and the SouthWest SPring maize region (SWSP). The results showed that CWDI demonstrated the highest sensitivity and accuracy in the NSP Region, the HSU Region, and the SWSP Region, and MCI was superior in the SSP Region. From the perspective of maize development stages, the most applicable index during planting — tasseling period (V0–VT) and tasseling — ripening period (V0-R6), as well as the entire growing period from planting to ripening period (V0-R6) was also CWDI, with exceptions for V0-R6 in the SSP region and VT–R6 in the SWSP region. Nevertheless, since CWDI had the highest false negative identification rate among all indices, it was recommended that MCI in conjunction with CWDI to enhance the accuracy of identifying maize droughts in China. This research provides a technical basis for selecting suitable drought indices in different maize producing regions, and also for improving the precision of maize drought identification in China.
Suggested Citation
Jie Ma & Peijuan Wang & Rui Feng & Yuanda Zhang & Yang Li & Qi Wang & Dingrong Wu & Yuping Ma, 2025.
"Applicability assessment of six drought indices in different maize producing regions of China,"
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(11), pages 13067-13092, June.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:11:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07310-3
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07310-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:11:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07310-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.