IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v120y2024i8d10.1007_s11069-024-06490-8.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of machine learning algorithms for slope stability prediction using an automated machine learning approach

Author

Listed:
  • Talas Fikret Kurnaz

    (Mersin University)

  • Caner Erden

    (Sakarya University of Applied Sciences
    Sakarya University of Applied Sciences)

  • Uğur Dağdeviren

    (Kutahya Dumlupinar University)

  • Alparslan Serhat Demir

    (Sakarya University)

  • Abdullah Hulusi Kökçam

    (Sakarya University)

Abstract

Evaluation of slope failures, which cause significant loss of life and property comparable to natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods and hurricanes, is one of the main areas of interest in geotechnical engineering. Although traditional and modern methods have been developed for slope stability analysis, the importance given to computer-based approaches has increased in recent years. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of advanced machine learning (ML) algorithms in classification-based slope stability assessment. In this context, examining the impact of input parameters, such as slope height, slope angle, unit volume weight, internal friction angle of the soil, cohesion of the slope material, and water pressure ratio on the slope stability potential and a comparative analysis was performed on the ML algorithms. On the other hand, automated machine learning (AutoML) approaches were used to make rapid and comprehensive comparisons of ensemble, boosting, bagging and traditional ML algorithms to simplifying application development. The weighted ensemble learning algorithm provided by the AutoGluon package outperformed other algorithms in both testing and training accuracy, achieving an impressive rate of 97.5%, according to the obtained results. All algorithms included in the study performed well, with NeuralNetTorch and CatBoost securing the second position with an accuracy rate of 95%. Furthermore, when evaluating the importance of features using the best algorithm, it can be seen that unit volume weight and internal friction angle of soil had the highest weights, 0.225 and 0.200, respectively, indicating their importance in classifying slope stability. In conclusion, our research significantly advanced slope stability assessment, achieving one of the highest accuracy of 0.975 among various classification-based studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Talas Fikret Kurnaz & Caner Erden & Uğur Dağdeviren & Alparslan Serhat Demir & Abdullah Hulusi Kökçam, 2024. "Comparison of machine learning algorithms for slope stability prediction using an automated machine learning approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(8), pages 6991-7014, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06490-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06490-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06490-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-024-06490-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06490-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.