IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v120y2024i3d10.1007_s11069-023-06310-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating landslide hazard distribution based on machine learning and bivariate statistics in Utmah Region, Yemen

Author

Listed:
  • Yasser M. Khalil

    (Northeast Normal University)

  • Yousef A. Al-Masnay

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Nabil M. Al-Areeq

    (Thamar University)

  • Ali R. Al-Aizari

    (Tianjin University)

  • Bazel Al-Shaibah

    (Northeast Normal University)

  • Xingpeng Liu

    (Northeast Normal University
    Ministry of Education
    Northeast Normal University)

Abstract

Landslides represent significant risks to human activity, leading to infrastructure damage and loss of life. This study focuses on assessing landslide hazards in Utmah Region, Yemen. The evaluation involves comparing the effectiveness of the relative frequency ratio model with five machine learning algorithms (MLAs) for hazard mapping. Field surveys, high-resolution satellite imagery, and aerial photography were utilized in the study. The inventory map was generated after identifying and mapping 100 landslides. The inventory was then divided randomly into a training dataset (70 landslides) and a validation dataset (30 landslides), with an equal number of non-landslide pixels. Eleven additional landslide conditioning factors were collected from various sources, and the frequency ratio (FR) approach was employed to identify the most crucial variables for modeling. The models were rigorously tested and assessed using statistical metrics, including the Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, as well as the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve. The findings based on the training and validation datasets revealed that the RF algorithm (AUROC, 0.992) outperformed the other models in generating hazard maps. The XGBoost model (AUROC, 0.991), NB model (AUROC, 0.970), ANN model (AUROC, 0.922), KNN model (AUROC, 0.877), and FR (AUROC, 0.674) were found to be less effective. Consequently, the study highlights that the Random forest (RF) model shows promise as an effective approach for predicting landslides spatially on a global scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Yasser M. Khalil & Yousef A. Al-Masnay & Nabil M. Al-Areeq & Ali R. Al-Aizari & Bazel Al-Shaibah & Xingpeng Liu, 2024. "Estimating landslide hazard distribution based on machine learning and bivariate statistics in Utmah Region, Yemen," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(3), pages 2869-2907, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06310-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-06310-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-06310-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-023-06310-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xianyu Yu & Yi Wang & Ruiqing Niu & Youjian Hu, 2016. "A Combination of Geographically Weighted Regression, Particle Swarm Optimization and Support Vector Machine for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study at Wanzhou in the Three Gorges Area, Chin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-35, May.
    2. Viet-Ha Nhu & Ataollah Shirzadi & Himan Shahabi & Sushant K. Singh & Nadhir Al-Ansari & John J. Clague & Abolfazl Jaafari & Wei Chen & Shaghayegh Miraki & Jie Dou & Chinh Luu & Krzysztof Górski & Binh, 2020. "Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Comparison between Logistic Model Tree, Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes Tree, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Machine Algorithms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-30, April.
    3. C. van Westen & N. Rengers & R. Soeters, 2003. "Use of Geomorphological Information in Indirect Landslide Susceptibility Assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 30(3), pages 399-419, November.
    4. Minu Treesa Abraham & Neelima Satyam & Revuri Lokesh & Biswajeet Pradhan & Abdullah Alamri, 2021. "Factors Affecting Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: Assessing the Influence of Different Machine Learning Approaches, Sampling Strategies and Data Splitting," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Scott Miles, 2011. "Participatory model assessment of earthquake-induced landslide hazard models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 56(3), pages 749-766, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Batmyagmar Dashbold & L. Sebastian Bryson & Matthew M. Crawford, 2023. "Landslide hazard and susceptibility maps derived from satellite and remote sensing data using limit equilibrium analysis and machine learning model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(1), pages 235-265, March.
    2. Xiaoxiao Ju & Junjie Li & Chongxiang Sun & Bo Li, 2024. "Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using a CNN–BiLSTM-AM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Yumiao Wang & Xueling Wu & Zhangjian Chen & Fu Ren & Luwei Feng & Qingyun Du, 2019. "Optimizing the Predictive Ability of Machine Learning Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using SMOTE for Lishui City in Zhejiang Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-27, January.
    4. Hyo-sub Kang & Yun-tae Kim, 2016. "The physical vulnerability of different types of building structure to debris flow events," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1475-1493, February.
    5. Paúl Carrión-Mero & Néstor Montalván-Burbano & Fernando Morante-Carballo & Adolfo Quesada-Román & Boris Apolo-Masache, 2021. "Worldwide Research Trends in Landslide Science," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-24, September.
    6. K. Sajinkumar & S. Anbazhagan, 2015. "Geomorphic appraisal of landslides on the windward slope of Western Ghats, southern India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(1), pages 953-973, January.
    7. Yimin Li & Xuanlun Deng & Peikun Ji & Yiming Yang & Wenxue Jiang & Zhifang Zhao, 2022. "Evaluation of Landslide Susceptibility Based on CF-SVM in Nujiang Prefecture," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-24, October.
    8. Xianyu Yu & Tingting Xiong & Weiwei Jiang & Jianguo Zhou, 2023. "Comparative Assessment of the Efficacy of the Five Kinds of Models in Landslide Susceptibility Map for Factor Screening: A Case Study at Zigui-Badong in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, January.
    9. Danang Hadmoko & Franck Lavigne & Junun Sartohadi & Pramono Hadi & Winaryo, 2010. "Landslide hazard and risk assessment and their application in risk management and landuse planning in eastern flank of Menoreh Mountains, Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 54(3), pages 623-642, September.
    10. Paul Sestraș & Ștefan Bilașco & Sanda Roșca & Sanda Naș & Mircea V. Bondrea & Raluca Gâlgău & Ioel Vereș & Tudor Sălăgean & Velibor Spalević & Sorin M. Cîmpeanu, 2019. "Landslides Susceptibility Assessment Based on GIS Statistical Bivariate Analysis in the Hills Surrounding a Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-23, March.
    11. Esteban Bravo-López & Tomás Fernández Del Castillo & Chester Sellers & Jorge Delgado-García, 2023. "Analysis of Conditioning Factors in Cuenca, Ecuador, for Landslide Susceptibility Maps Generation Employing Machine Learning Methods," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, May.
    12. Khabat Khosravi & Ebrahim Nohani & Edris Maroufinia & Hamid Reza Pourghasemi, 2016. "A GIS-based flood susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence bivariate statistical models with multi-criteria decision-making techn," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(2), pages 947-987, September.
    13. Paola Gattinoni, 2009. "Parametrical landslide modeling for the hydrogeological susceptibility assessment: from the Crati Valley to the Cavallerizzo landslide (Southern Italy)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 50(1), pages 161-178, July.
    14. Adrián G. Bruzón & Patricia Arrogante-Funes & Fátima Arrogante-Funes & Fidel Martín-González & Carlos J. Novillo & Rubén R. Fernández & René Vázquez-Jiménez & Antonio Alarcón-Paredes & Gustavo A. Alon, 2021. "Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using an AutoML Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-20, October.
    15. Cao, Quoc Dung & Miles, Scott B. & Choe, Youngjun, 2022. "Infrastructure recovery curve estimation using Gaussian process regression on expert elicited data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    16. Gao Hua-xi & Yin Kun-long, 2014. "Study on spatial prediction and time forecast of landslide," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 70(3), pages 1735-1748, February.
    17. Deborah Simon Mwakapesa & Yimin Mao & Xiaoji Lan & Yaser Ahangari Nanehkaran, 2023. "Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using DIvisive ANAlysis (DIANA) and RObust Clustering Using linKs (ROCK) Algorithms, and Comparison of Their Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    18. Mieko Kumasaki & Malcolm King & Mitsuru Arai & Lili Yang, 2016. "Anatomy of cascading natural disasters in Japan: main modes and linkages," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1425-1441, February.
    19. Danang Sri Hadmoko & Franck Lavigne & Guruh Samodra, 2017. "Application of a semiquantitative and GIS-based statistical model to landslide susceptibility zonation in Kayangan Catchment, Java, Indonesia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(1), pages 437-468, May.
    20. Ginés Suárez & María José Domínguez-Cuesta, 2021. "Improving landslide susceptibility predictive power through colluvium mapping in Tegucigalpa, Honduras," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 47-66, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06310-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.