IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v120y2024i2d10.1007_s11069-023-06250-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental controls on lifeguard-estimated surf-zone hazards, beach crowds, and resulting life risk at a high-energy sandy beach in southwest France

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno Castelle

    (University of Bordeaux)

  • Jeoffrey Dehez

    (INRAE Nouvelle Aquitaine)

  • Jean-Philippe Savy

    (SMGBL)

  • Vincent Marieu

    (University of Bordeaux)

  • Sandrine Lyser

    (INRAE Nouvelle Aquitaine)

  • Stéphane Bujan

    (University of Bordeaux)

  • David Carayon

    (INRAE Nouvelle Aquitaine)

  • Rob Brander

    (UNSW Sydney)

Abstract

Understanding and predicting surf zone risks is of paramount importance to prevent drowning incidents and severe spine injuries on beaches globally. This study holistically addressed life risk at La Lette Blanche beach, southwest France, during the lifeguard-patrolled summer period (July–August) 2022, where intense rip currents and shore-break waves co-exist at different times and locations along the beach. Beach crowds and the levels of rip current and shore-break wave hazards were estimated hourly by lifeguards during patrolling hours. Wave, tide and weather conditions were also continuously recorded, providing comprehensive insights into the primary environmental controls on surf zone hazards and beach attendance. Results show that the daily average rip current hazard increases with large, long-period and near shore-normal waves, while the shore-break wave hazard is increased for long-period, near shore-normal waves and large tide ranges. Beachgoer crowd numbers increase on warm, sunny and light wind days although a severe heat wave occurring in July 2022 significantly decreased daily average beach crowd and deeply affected beach use. Days characterized by strong hazards and large beach attendance were associated with the largest amount of lifeguard rescues and drowning incidents, although correlations decreased by the end of the summer. This is hypothesized to be the signature of evolving lifeguard strategies (e.g., preferred locations of the supervised bathing zone, prevention measures) as they progressively increase their understanding of the surf zone hazards variability in both time and space at their beach as a function of tidal stage and incident wave conditions. Warm, sunny and light-wind sunny days (maximizing beach crowds), with large, long-period shore-normally incident waves and large tide range (maximizing surf zone hazards) were the most risky days, with shore-break waves and rip current hazards notably peaking at different times of the day. This study shows that lifeguards can be a valuable source of data to improve understanding of the environmental controls on beach crowd, surf zone hazards and life risk at the beach, which provides critical information to the development of holistic beach risk predictors.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno Castelle & Jeoffrey Dehez & Jean-Philippe Savy & Vincent Marieu & Sandrine Lyser & Stéphane Bujan & David Carayon & Rob Brander, 2024. "Environmental controls on lifeguard-estimated surf-zone hazards, beach crowds, and resulting life risk at a high-energy sandy beach in southwest France," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(2), pages 1557-1576, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06250-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-06250-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-06250-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-023-06250-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06250-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.