IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v112y2022i2d10.1007_s11069-022-05229-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scenario simulation of the geohazard dynamic process of large-scale landslides: a case study of the Xiaomojiu landslide along the Jinsha River

Author

Listed:
  • Jianqi Zhuang

    (Chang’an University)

  • Kecheng Jia

    (Chang’an University)

  • Jiewei Zhan

    (Chang’an University)

  • Yi Zhu

    (Chang’an University)

  • Chenglong Zhang

    (Chang’an University)

  • Jiaxu Kong

    (Chang’an University)

  • Chenhui Du

    (Chang’an University)

  • Shibao Wang

    (Chang’an University)

  • Yanbo Cao

    (Chang’an University)

  • Jianbing Peng

    (Chang’an University)

Abstract

Large-scale landslides often cause severe damage due to their long run-out distances and having disaster chain effects. Scenario simulation has been adopted in the current work in order to analyze the Xiaomojiu landslide dynamic processes. The landslide characteristics and topography data are obtained via field investigations, whereas high-resolution topographic data (0.17 m) are obtained using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. The landslide sliding velocity, deposition characteristics, and flood outburst after a landslide dam failure were obtained using Particle Flow Code (PFC-3D) which introduced the changeable friction coefficient and the HEC-RAS software. The results showed that: 1. The landslide presents a scallop shape with a length of 1110 m, an average width of 950 m, and an area of 1.05 × 106 m2. The average thickness and volume of the sliding body are approximately 50 m and 5.45 × 107 m3. The InSAR (Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar) deformation analysis showed that the Xiaomojiu landslide has a maximum annual displacement rate of 60 mm/y and a maximum accumulation deformation of 180 mm since November 25, 2017. 2. The failure process of the Xiaomojiu landslide lasted for 65 s with a maximum velocity of 78.2 m/s. According to the landslide simulation results, the deposited area is approximately 2023 m long, 900 m wide, and has a maximum height of approximately 149 m. 3. A landslide-dammed lake with an elevation of 2940 m and a storage capacity of 4.13 × 109 m3 is formed after the landslide blocks the Jinsha River, and the maximum peak flow rate of the breach is 12051.7 m3/s, 43,451.4 m3/s, 148,635.6 m3/s, and 304,544.7 m3/s for the landslide-dammed failure degrees of 15%, 25%, 50%, and 75%, respectively. These results provide a reference for the risk analysis and mitigation of the landslide.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianqi Zhuang & Kecheng Jia & Jiewei Zhan & Yi Zhu & Chenglong Zhang & Jiaxu Kong & Chenhui Du & Shibao Wang & Yanbo Cao & Jianbing Peng, 2022. "Scenario simulation of the geohazard dynamic process of large-scale landslides: a case study of the Xiaomojiu landslide along the Jinsha River," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 112(2), pages 1337-1357, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:112:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-022-05229-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05229-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-022-05229-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-022-05229-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohsin Butt & Muhammad Umar & Raheel Qamar, 2013. "Landslide dam and subsequent dam-break flood estimation using HEC-RAS model in Northern Pakistan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 65(1), pages 241-254, January.
    2. Antoine Lucas & Anne Mangeney & Jean Paul Ampuero, 2014. "Frictional velocity-weakening in landslides on Earth and on other planetary bodies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 1-9, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dan Yu & Xinghui Huang & Zhengyuan Li, 2020. "Variation patterns of landslide basal friction revealed from long-period seismic waveform inversion," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 100(1), pages 313-327, January.
    2. Junxue Ma & Jian Chen & Zhijiu Cui & Wendy Zhou & Ruichen Chen & Chengbiao Wang, 2022. "Reconstruction of catastrophic outburst floods of the Diexi ancient landslide-dammed lake in the Upper Minjiang River, Eastern Tibetan Plateau," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 112(2), pages 1191-1221, June.
    3. Hasnain Gardezi & Muhammad Bilal & Qiangong Cheng & Aiguo Xing & Yu Zhuang & Tahir Masood, 2021. "A comparative analysis of attabad landslide on january 4, 2010, using two numerical models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(1), pages 519-538, May.
    4. Morgane Brunet & Laurent Moretti & Anne Friant & Anne Mangeney & Enrique Domingo Fernández Nieto & Francois Bouchut, 2017. "Numerical simulation of the 30–45 ka debris avalanche flow of Montagne Pelée volcano, Martinique: from volcano flank collapse to submarine emplacement," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(2), pages 1189-1222, June.
    5. Chi-Feng Chen & Chung-Ming Liu, 2014. "The definition of urban stormwater tolerance threshold and its conceptual estimation: an example from Taiwan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(2), pages 173-190, September.
    6. Matthias Rauter & Sylvain Viroulet & Sigríður Sif Gylfadóttir & Wolfgang Fellin & Finn Løvholt, 2022. "Granular porous landslide tsunami modelling – the 2014 Lake Askja flank collapse," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Sen Tian & Xuanyan Dai & Guangjin Wang & Yiyu Lu & Jie Chen, 2021. "Formation and evolution characteristics of dam breach and tailings flow from dam failure: an experimental study," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(2), pages 1621-1638, June.
    8. Sanshao Ren & Yongshuang Zhang & Jinqiu Li & Xiaoyi Liu & Ruian Wu, 2023. "A new type of sliding zone soil and its severe effect on the formation of giant landslides in the Jinsha River tectonic suture zone, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(2), pages 1847-1868, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:112:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-022-05229-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.