IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v111y2022i1d10.1007_s11069-021-05068-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the state of homogeneity, variability and trends in the rainfall time series from 1969 to 2017 and its significance for groundwater in north-east India

Author

Listed:
  • Parashmoni Borah

    (Tezpur University)

  • Suhasini Hazarika

    (Tezpur University)

  • Amit Prakash

    (Tezpur University)

Abstract

Rainfall is the key climatic variable, on which water availability, food security and livelihood depend, especially in an agrarian society like the northeast region of India. It is an ecologically sensitive zone, harbouring world’s three biodiversity hotspots and the world’s highest rainfall zone. Therefore, the assessment of variability and trend in the rainfall regime in this region is imperative. The present study focuses on testing the homogeneity status and prevalent trends in the long-term rainfall data at five different locations in North-East India, namely Cherrapunji, Dibrugarh, Guwahati, Kailashahar and Tulihal. The impact of rainfall variability on groundwater level was further investigated. The estimation of precipitation concentration index and standard precipitation anomaly was also carried out to investigate the intra-annual variability and drought conditions in this region. The results indicate the homogeneous nature of rainfall time series at 99% significance level at all the sites with low coefficient of variance (CV, %) at Dibrugarh in monsoon and annual rainfall series. The precipitation concentration index values show high intra-annual variability in the rainfall data. Decadal and annual standard precipitation anomaly values indicate the presence of extreme and severe drought conditions in the last two decades. The trend analysis results display the presence of significant negative trends in monsoonal and annual rainfall at Dibrugarh. During pre-monsoon season, all the sites exhibiting positive drift with only Guwahati and Tulihal have significant trends (at 90% significance level). Monthly rainfall trend analysis results revealed strong and significant (95%) negative trends during peak monsoon months of July at Dibrugarh and Guwahati and with 85% significance level at Cherrapunji (which was the world’s highest rainfall zone in recent past). The impact assessment results indicate a direct association between rainfall and groundwater at lag2, i.e., the impact of any change in the rainfall amount on groundwater in a given area may be evident after two seasons. The results revealed an enhancement of 1.0 ± 0.1, 1.1 ± 0.2, 0.9 ± 0.2 mm in the groundwater level for each mm increase in the rainfall at DBR, GHY and KSH, respectively. At CHR, the relation was evident only after 10 seasons because of excessive rainfall and runoff. The results had significant bearing for the policy makers and farming community in the region for better planning of crop cultivation in order to adapt to the changing climate in this region.

Suggested Citation

  • Parashmoni Borah & Suhasini Hazarika & Amit Prakash, 2022. "Assessing the state of homogeneity, variability and trends in the rainfall time series from 1969 to 2017 and its significance for groundwater in north-east India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(1), pages 585-617, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:111:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-021-05068-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-021-05068-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-021-05068-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-021-05068-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Buuren, Stef & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Karin, 2011. "mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 45(i03).
    2. A. N. Pettitt, 1979. "A Non‐Parametric Approach to the Change‐Point Problem," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 28(2), pages 126-135, June.
    3. Kowarik, Alexander & Templ, Matthias, 2016. "Imputation with the R Package VIM," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 74(i07).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wangyuyang Zhai & Zhoufeng Wang & Youcan Feng & Lijun Xue & Zhenjie Ma & Lin Tian & Hongliang Sun, 2023. "Developing the Actual Precipitation Probability Distribution Based on the Complete Daily Series," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicholas Tierney & Dianne Cook, 2018. "Expanding tidy data principles to facilitate missing data exploration, visualization and assessment of imputations," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 14/18, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    2. Nengsih Titin Agustin & Bertrand Frédéric & Maumy-Bertrand Myriam & Meyer Nicolas, 2019. "Determining the number of components in PLS regression on incomplete data set," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 18(6), pages 1-28, December.
    3. Adel Bosch & Steven F. Koch, 2021. "Individual and Household Debt: Does Imputation Choice Matter?," Working Papers 202141, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    4. Matthias Templ, 2023. "Enhancing Precision in Large-Scale Data Analysis: An Innovative Robust Imputation Algorithm for Managing Outliers and Missing Values," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Maria Lucia Parrella & Giuseppina Albano & Michele La Rocca & Cira Perna, 2019. "Reconstructing missing data sequences in multivariate time series: an application to environmental data," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(2), pages 359-383, June.
    6. Noémi Kreif & Richard Grieve & Iván Díaz & David Harrison, 2015. "Evaluation of the Effect of a Continuous Treatment: A Machine Learning Approach with an Application to Treatment for Traumatic Brain Injury," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(9), pages 1213-1228, September.
    7. Abhilash Bandam & Eedris Busari & Chloi Syranidou & Jochen Linssen & Detlef Stolten, 2022. "Classification of Building Types in Germany: A Data-Driven Modeling Approach," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Boonstra Philip S. & Little Roderick J.A. & West Brady T. & Andridge Rebecca R. & Alvarado-Leiton Fernanda, 2021. "A Simulation Study of Diagnostics for Selection Bias," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 37(3), pages 751-769, September.
    9. Christopher J Greenwood & George J Youssef & Primrose Letcher & Jacqui A Macdonald & Lauryn J Hagg & Ann Sanson & Jenn Mcintosh & Delyse M Hutchinson & John W Toumbourou & Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz &, 2020. "A comparison of penalised regression methods for informing the selection of predictive markers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    10. Liangyuan Hu & Lihua Li, 2022. "Using Tree-Based Machine Learning for Health Studies: Literature Review and Case Series," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Stephen J. Déry & Marco A. Hernández-Henríquez & Tricia A. Stadnyk & Tara J. Troy, 2021. "Vanishing weekly hydropeaking cycles in American and Canadian rivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Norah Alyabs & Sy Han Chiou, 2022. "The Missing Indicator Approach for Accelerated Failure Time Model with Covariates Subject to Limits of Detection," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-13, May.
    13. Feldkircher, Martin, 2014. "The determinants of vulnerability to the global financial crisis 2008 to 2009: Credit growth and other sources of risk," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 19-49.
    14. Ida Kubiszewski & Kenneth Mulder & Diane Jarvis & Robert Costanza, 2022. "Toward better measurement of sustainable development and wellbeing: A small number of SDG indicators reliably predict life satisfaction," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 139-148, February.
    15. Georges Steffgen & Philipp E. Sischka & Martha Fernandez de Henestrosa, 2020. "The Quality of Work Index and the Quality of Employment Index: A Multidimensional Approach of Job Quality and Its Links to Well-Being at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-31, October.
    16. Christopher Kath & Florian Ziel, 2018. "The value of forecasts: Quantifying the economic gains of accurate quarter-hourly electricity price forecasts," Papers 1811.08604, arXiv.org.
    17. Esef Hakan Toytok & Sungur Gürel, 2019. "Does Project Children’s University Increase Academic Self-Efficacy in 6th Graders? A Weak Experimental Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, February.
    18. J M van Niekerk & M C Vos & A Stein & L M A Braakman-Jansen & A F Voor in ‘t holt & J E W C van Gemert-Pijnen, 2020. "Risk factors for surgical site infections using a data-driven approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, October.
    19. Joost R. Ginkel, 2020. "Standardized Regression Coefficients and Newly Proposed Estimators for $${R}^{{2}}$$R2 in Multiply Imputed Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(1), pages 185-205, March.
    20. Lara Jehi & Xinge Ji & Alex Milinovich & Serpil Erzurum & Amy Merlino & Steve Gordon & James B Young & Michael W Kattan, 2020. "Development and validation of a model for individualized prediction of hospitalization risk in 4,536 patients with COVID-19," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:111:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-021-05068-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.