IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metron/v80y2022i3d10.1007_s40300-021-00226-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On continuity correction for RSS-structured cluster randomized designs with binary outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Soohyun Ahn

    (Ajou University)

  • Xinlei Wang

    (Southern Methodist University)

  • Mumu Wang

    (Southern Methodist University)

  • Johan Lim

    (Seoul National University)

Abstract

Correction for continuity is commonly used to improve the inference for binary data when the event of interest is rare or the sample size is small. A standard approach to reduce the bias in logit estimation is to add a small constant to both event and nonevent counts. The 0.5 adjustment is known as a correction rendering the estimation unbiased up to the order of $$K^{-1}$$ K - 1 , where K is the size of a simple random sample. However, for general designs beyond simple random sampling, the bias in estimating the logit is no longer zero in order $$K^{-1}$$ K - 1 . In this paper, we derive the formula of the correction factor that makes the first-order term of the bias vanish for general designs. We then apply it to estimate the logit when data are from ranked set sampling (RSS) embedded in a cluster randomized design (CRD). An RSS-structured CRD (RSS-CRD), introduced by Wang et al. (J Am Stat Assoc 111: 1576–1590, 2016), is a new two-stage design for more efficient estimation of treatment effect. We propose two methods to estimate the correction factors derived for RSS-CRDs. We numerically compare the proposed methods to those with the default factor 0.5 in terms of bias and mean squared error for estimating the treatment effect, and finally make recommendations to practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Soohyun Ahn & Xinlei Wang & Mumu Wang & Johan Lim, 2022. "On continuity correction for RSS-structured cluster randomized designs with binary outcomes," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 80(3), pages 383-397, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:metron:v:80:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s40300-021-00226-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s40300-021-00226-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40300-021-00226-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40300-021-00226-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Omer Ozturk, 2019. "Two-stage cluster samples with ranked set sampling designs," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(1), pages 63-91, February.
    2. Omer Ozturk & N. Balakrishnan, 2009. "An Exact Control-Versus-Treatment Comparison Test Based on Ranked Set Samples," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 1213-1222, December.
    3. Zamanzade, Ehsan & Wang, Xinlei, 2017. "Estimation of population proportion for judgment post-stratification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 257-269.
    4. Lutz Dümbgen & Ehsan Zamanzade, 2020. "Inference on a distribution function from ranked set samples," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(1), pages 157-185, February.
    5. Xinlei Wang & Johan Lim & Lynne Stokes, 2016. "Using Ranked Set Sampling With Cluster Randomized Designs for Improved Inference on Treatment Effects," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1576-1590, October.
    6. Dulal K. Bhaumik & Anup Amatya & Sharon-Lise T. Normand & Joel Greenhouse & Eloise Kaizar & Brian Neelon & Robert D. Gibbons, 2012. "Meta-Analysis of Rare Binary Adverse Event Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(498), pages 555-567, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mozhgan Alirezaei Dizicheh & Nasrollah Iranpanah & Ehsan Zamanzade, 2021. "Bootstrap Methods for Judgment Post Stratification," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(5), pages 2453-2471, October.
    2. Ehsan Zamanzade & M. Mahdizadeh & Hani M. Samawi, 2020. "Efficient estimation of cumulative distribution function using moving extreme ranked set sampling with application to reliability," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 104(3), pages 485-502, September.
    3. Amirhossein Alvandi & Armin Hatefi, 2023. "Analysis of Ordinal Populations from Judgment Post-Stratification," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-27, August.
    4. Omer Ozturk, 2019. "Two-stage cluster samples with ranked set sampling designs," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(1), pages 63-91, February.
    5. Dankmar Böhning & Heinz Holling & Walailuck Böhning & Patarawan Sangnawakij, 2021. "Investigating heterogeneity in meta-analysis of studies with rare events," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 79(3), pages 259-272, December.
    6. Omer Ozturk & Olena Kravchuk & Raymond Correll, 2022. "Row–Column Sampling Design Using Auxiliary Ranking Variables," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(4), pages 652-673, December.
    7. Santu Ghosh & Arpita Chatterjee & N. Balakrishnan, 2017. "Nonparametric confidence intervals for ranked set samples," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1689-1725, December.
    8. Xinlei Wang & Ke Wang & Johan Lim, 2012. "Isotonized CDF Estimation from Judgment Poststratification Data with Empty Strata," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(1), pages 194-202, March.
    9. Omer Ozturk & Olena Kravchuk, 2021. "Judgment Post-stratified Assessment Combining Ranking Information from Multiple Sources, with a Field Phenotyping Example," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(3), pages 329-348, September.
    10. Zamanzade, Elham & Parvardeh, Afshin & Asadi, Majid, 2019. "Estimation of mean residual life based on ranked set sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 35-55.
    11. M. Mahdizadeh & Ehsan Zamanzade, 2022. "New insights on goodness-of-fit tests for ranked set samples," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(6), pages 1777-1799, December.
    12. A. Hussein & H. Muttlak & E. Al-Sawi, 2013. "Group sequential methods based on ranked set samples," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 547-562, August.
    13. Ehsan Zamanzade & Xinlei Wang, 2018. "Proportion estimation in ranked set sampling in the presence of tie information," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 1349-1366, September.
    14. Miguel-Angel Negrín-Hernández & María Martel-Escobar & Francisco-José Vázquez-Polo, 2021. "Bayesian Meta-Analysis for Binary Data and Prior Distribution on Models," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-18, January.
    15. Elham Zamanzade & Majid Asadi & Afshin Parvardeh & Ehsan Zamanzade, 2023. "A ranked-based estimator of the mean past lifetime with an application," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 161-177, February.
    16. Francisco-José Vázquez-Polo & Miguel-Ángel Negrín-Hernández & María Martel-Escobar, 2020. "Meta-Analysis with Few Studies and Binary Data: A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Ali Dastbaravarde & Ehsan Zamanzade, 2020. "On estimation of $$P\left( X > Y \right) $$PX>Y based on judgement post stratification," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 767-785, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metron:v:80:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s40300-021-00226-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.