IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v32y2017i4d10.1007_s00180-017-0744-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonparametric confidence intervals for ranked set samples

Author

Listed:
  • Santu Ghosh

    (Augusta University)

  • Arpita Chatterjee

    (Georgia Southern University)

  • N. Balakrishnan

    (McMaster University)

Abstract

In this work, we propose several different confidence interval methods based on ranked-set samples. First, we develop bootstrap bias-corrected and accelerated method for constructing confidence intervals based on ranked-set samples. Usually, for this method, the accelerated constant is computed by employing jackknife method. Here, we derive an analytical expression for the accelerated constant, which results in reducing the computational burden of this bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap method. The other proposed confidence interval approaches are based on a monotone transformation along with normal approximation. We also study the asymptotic properties of the proposed methods. The performances of these methods are then compared with those of the conventional methods. Through this empirical study, it is shown that the proposed confidence intervals can be successfully applied in practice. The usefulness of the proposed methods is further illustrated by analyzing a real-life data on shrubs.

Suggested Citation

  • Santu Ghosh & Arpita Chatterjee & N. Balakrishnan, 2017. "Nonparametric confidence intervals for ranked set samples," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1689-1725, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:32:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s00180-017-0744-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-017-0744-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-017-0744-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-017-0744-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hani M. Samawi & Haresh Rochani & Daniel Linder & Arpita Chatterjee, 2017. "More efficient logistic analysis using moving extreme ranked set sampling," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 753-766, March.
    2. Omer Ozturk & N. Balakrishnan, 2009. "An Exact Control-Versus-Treatment Comparison Test Based on Ranked Set Samples," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 1213-1222, December.
    3. Haiying Chen & Elizabeth A. Stasny & Douglas A. Wolfe, 2006. "Unbalanced Ranked Set Sampling for Estimating a Population Proportion," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 150-158, March.
    4. Daniel F. Linder & Hani Samawi & Lili Yu & Arpita Chatterjee & Yisong Huang & Robert Vogel, 2015. "On stratified bivariate ranked set sampling for regression estimators," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(12), pages 2571-2583, December.
    5. Modarres, Reza & Hui, Terrence P. & Zheng, Gang, 2006. "Resampling methods for ranked set samples," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 1039-1050, November.
    6. Fligner, Michael A. & MacEachern, Steven N., 2006. "Nonparametric Two-Sample Methods for Ranked-Set Sample Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1107-1118, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ehsan Zamanzade & M. Mahdizadeh & Hani M. Samawi, 2020. "Efficient estimation of cumulative distribution function using moving extreme ranked set sampling with application to reliability," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 104(3), pages 485-502, September.
    2. Zamanzade, Ehsan & Wang, Xinlei, 2017. "Estimation of population proportion for judgment post-stratification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 257-269.
    3. Xinlei Wang & Ke Wang & Johan Lim, 2012. "Isotonized CDF Estimation from Judgment Poststratification Data with Empty Strata," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(1), pages 194-202, March.
    4. Radhakanta Das & Vivek Verma & Dilip C. Nath, 2017. "Bayesian Estimation Of Measles Vaccination Coverage Under Ranked Set Sampling," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 18(4), pages 589-608, December.
    5. Jinguo Gao & Omer Ozturk, 2017. "Rank regression in order restricted randomised designs," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 231-257, April.
    6. Deborah Kanda & Jingjing Yin & Xinyan Zhang & Hani Samawi, 2025. "Efficient regression analyses with zero-augmented models based on ranking," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 601-632, February.
    7. repec:exl:29stat:v:20:y:2019:i:3:p:1-30 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Zamanzade, Elham & Parvardeh, Afshin & Asadi, Majid, 2019. "Estimation of mean residual life based on ranked set sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 35-55.
    9. Das Radhakanta & Verma Vivek & Nath Dilip C., 2017. "Bayesian Estimation of Measles Vaccination Coverage Under Ranked Set Sampling," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 18(4), pages 589-608, December.
    10. Nader Gemayel & Elizabeth Stasny & James Tackett & Douglas Wolfe, 2012. "Ranked set sampling: an auditing application," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 413-422, November.
    11. Robertson, B.L. & Reale, M. & Price, C.J. & Brown, J.A., 2021. "Quasi-random ranked set sampling," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    12. Drikvandi, Reza & Modarres, Reza & Jalilian, Abdullah H., 2011. "A bootstrap test for symmetry based on ranked set samples," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 1807-1814, April.
    13. Matthews, Michael J. & Wolfe, Douglas A., 2017. "Unified ranked sampling," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 173-178.
    14. Wenchen Dai & Wangxue Chen & Honglve Zhao, 2025. "Estimation of the population mean under imperfect simple Z ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 66(4), pages 1-22, June.
    15. M. Mahdizadeh & Ehsan Zamanzade, 2022. "New insights on goodness-of-fit tests for ranked set samples," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(6), pages 1777-1799, December.
    16. Hani Samawi & Haresh Rochani & JingJing Yin & Daniel Linder & Robert Vogel, 2018. "Notes on kernel density based mode estimation using more efficient sampling designs," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 1071-1090, June.
    17. Cesar Augusto Taconeli & Wagner Hugo Bonat, 2020. "On the performance of estimation methods under ranked set sampling," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 1805-1826, December.
    18. Hani Samawi & Mohammed Al-Haj Ebrahem & Noha Al-Zubaidin, 2010. "An optimal sign test for one-sample bivariate location model using an alternative bivariate ranked-set sample," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 629-650.
    19. A. Hussein & H. Muttlak & E. Al-Sawi, 2013. "Group sequential methods based on ranked set samples," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 547-562, August.
    20. M. Mahdizadeh & Ehsan Zamanzade, 2018. "Interval estimation of $$P(X," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 1325-1348, September.
    21. Zamanzade, Ehsan & Mahdizadeh, M., 2017. "A more efficient proportion estimator in ranked set sampling," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 28-33.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:32:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s00180-017-0744-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.