IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metrik/v88y2025i3d10.1007_s00184-024-00960-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structure of hybrid censoring schemes and its implications

Author

Listed:
  • Erhard Cramer

    (RWTH Aachen University)

Abstract

In this paper, structural properties of (progressive) hybrid censoring schemes are established by studying the possible data scenarios resulting from the hybrid censoring scheme. The results illustrate that the distributions of hybrid censored random variables can be immediately derived from the cases of Type-I and Type-II censored data. Furthermore, it turns out that results in likelihood and Bayesian inference are also obtained directly which explains the similarities present in the probabilistic and statistical analysis of these censoring schemes. The power of the approach is illustrated by applying the approach to the quite complex unified Type-II (progressive) hybrid censoring scheme. Finally, it is shown that the approach is not restricted to (progressively Type-II censored) order statistics and that it can be extended to almost any kind of ordered data.

Suggested Citation

  • Erhard Cramer, 2025. "Structure of hybrid censoring schemes and its implications," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 88(3), pages 393-417, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:88:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s00184-024-00960-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s00184-024-00960-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00184-024-00960-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00184-024-00960-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erhard Cramer & Udo Kamps, 2003. "Marginal distributions of sequential and generalized order statistics," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 293-310, December.
    2. Ping Chan & Hon Ng & Feng Su, 2015. "Exact likelihood inference for the two-parameter exponential distribution under Type-II progressively hybrid censoring," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 78(6), pages 747-770, August.
    3. Julian Górny & Erhard Cramer, 2018. "Modularization of hybrid censoring schemes and its application to unified progressive hybrid censoring," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 173-210, February.
    4. Xiaojun Zhu & N. Balakrishnan & Helton Saulo, 2019. "On the existence and uniqueness of the maximum likelihood estimates of parameters of Laplace Birnbaum–Saunders distribution based on Type-I, Type-II and hybrid censored samples," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 82(7), pages 759-778, October.
    5. Balakrishnan, N. & Kundu, Debasis, 2013. "Hybrid censoring: Models, inferential results and applications," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 166-209.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Bentum, Thomas & Cramer, Erhard, 2019. "Stochastic monotonicity of MLEs of the mean for exponentially distributed lifetimes under hybrid censoring," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1-8.
    2. Wang, Liang & Tripathi, Yogesh Mani & Lodhi, Chandrakant & Zuo, Xuanjia, 2022. "Inference for constant-stress Weibull competing risks model under generalized progressive hybrid censoring," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 70-83.
    3. Arnab Koley & Debasis Kundu, 2017. "On generalized progressive hybrid censoring in presence of competing risks," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 80(4), pages 401-426, May.
    4. Zhang, Fode & Shi, Yimin & Wang, Ruibing, 2017. "Geometry of the q-exponential distribution with dependent competing risks and accelerated life testing," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 468(C), pages 552-565.
    5. Rui Hua & Wenhao Gui, 2022. "Inference for copula-based dependent competing risks model with step-stress accelerated life test under generalized progressive hybrid censoring," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(5), pages 2399-2436, November.
    6. Julian Górny & Erhard Cramer, 2019. "From B-spline representations to gamma representations in hybrid censoring," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1119-1135, August.
    7. Amini, Morteza & Balakrishnan, N., 2013. "Nonparametric meta-analysis of independent samples of records," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 70-81.
    8. Refah Alotaibi & Ehab M. Almetwally & Qiuchen Hai & Hoda Rezk, 2022. "Optimal Test Plan of Step Stress Partially Accelerated Life Testing for Alpha Power Inverse Weibull Distribution under Adaptive Progressive Hybrid Censored Data and Different Loss Functions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(24), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Tian, Yuzhu & Zhu, Qianqian & Tian, Maozai, 2015. "Estimation for mixed exponential distributions under type-II progressively hybrid censored samples," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 85-96.
    10. López-Fidalgo, J. & Rivas-López, M.J., 2014. "Optimal experimental designs for partial likelihood information," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 859-867.
    11. Yashi Wang & Weiwei Zhuang & Taizhong Hu, 2010. "Conditionally stochastic domination of generalized order statistics from two samples," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 369-373, June.
    12. Georgios Psarrakos & Antonio Di Crescenzo, 2018. "A residual inaccuracy measure based on the relevation transform," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 37-59, January.
    13. Hashemi, Marzieh & Tavangar, Mahdi & Asadi, Majid, 2010. "Some properties of the residual lifetime of progressively Type-II right censored order statistics," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(9-10), pages 848-859, May.
    14. Soumya Roy & Biswabrata Pradhan, 2023. "Inference for log‐location‐scale family of distributions under competing risks with progressive type‐I interval censored data," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 77(2), pages 208-232, May.
    15. Vuong, Q.N. & Bedbur, S. & Kamps, U., 2013. "Distances between models of generalized order statistics," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 24-36.
    16. Suparna Basu & Sanjay K. Singh & Umesh Singh, 2019. "Estimation of Inverse Lindley Distribution Using Product of Spacings Function for Hybrid Censored Data," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 1377-1394, December.
    17. Beutner, E. & Cramer, E., 2014. "Using linear interpolation to reduce the order of the coverage error of nonparametric prediction intervals based on right-censored data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 95-109.
    18. Burkschat, M. & Kamps, U. & Kateri, M., 2010. "Sequential order statistics with an order statistics prior," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(8), pages 1826-1836, September.
    19. Burkschat, M., 2009. "Multivariate dependence of spacings of generalized order statistics," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(6), pages 1093-1106, July.
    20. Feizjavadian, S.H. & Hashemi, R., 2015. "Analysis of dependent competing risks in the presence of progressive hybrid censoring using Marshall–Olkin bivariate Weibull distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 19-34.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:88:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s00184-024-00960-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.