IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metcap/v27y2025i3d10.1007_s11009-025-10192-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Cost-Efficient Retrial Queueing Model for Mitigating DDoS Attacks with Standby Mechanisms

Author

Listed:
  • Poornima R

    (Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women)

  • Kirupa K

    (Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women)

Abstract

SYN flood attacks, a common form of Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS), severely disrupt service availability in networked systems. To mitigate this threat, a steady-state retrial queueing model is proposed, incorporating key mechanisms such as probabilistic admission control, standby server activation, feedback, retrial attempts, and random breakdowns with preventive maintenance. The system is modeled using batch arrivals to capture the bursty nature of SYN traffic. Analytical expressions for performance measures, including expected orbit size, server utilization, waiting time, and failure frequency are derived using supplementary variable techniques applied to differential equations. Admission control helps manage heavy SYN flood traffic by selectively filtering requests, thus preventing system overload. For practical validation, the model parameters are tuned using SYN flood data from the CICIDS 2017 (Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity 2017) benchmark dataset. Cost optimization of system parameters, such as standby rate and service rate, is achieved using Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), providing an effective trade-off between service reliability and operational cost. Numerical results and comparative scenario analysis demonstrate the model's robustness and efficiency in handling SYN attacks, offering valuable insights for real-world deployment in cybersecurity infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Poornima R & Kirupa K, 2025. "A Cost-Efficient Retrial Queueing Model for Mitigating DDoS Attacks with Standby Mechanisms," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 1-42, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:27:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11009-025-10192-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11009-025-10192-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11009-025-10192-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11009-025-10192-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Radha & K. Indhira & V.M. Chandrasekaran, 2020. "Analysis of M [X] /G k /1 retrial queue with Bernoulli-2 vacation, search for customers and hot stand-by," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 196-223.
    2. V. Saravanan & V. Poongothai & P. Godhandaraman, 2023. "Admission control policy of a two heterogeneous server finite capacity retrial queueing system with maintenance activity," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(4), pages 1902-1925, December.
    3. Nitin Mahla & Alka Choudhary & Dinesh C. Sharma, 2023. "Study of two heterogeneous servers with service feedback, vacation and a particular service interruption," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 26(2), pages 231-249.
    4. Xinlei Liu & Xiuli Xu & Mingxin Liu, 2024. "Strategy Analysis of Retrial Queue with Parallel Customer and Standby Server," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Dieter Fiems, 2023. "Retrial queues with constant retrial times," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 103(3), pages 347-365, April.
    6. Sanga, Sudeep Singh & Jain, Madhu, 2019. "Cost optimization and ANFIS computing for admission control of M/M/1/K queue with general retrial times and discouragement," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 363(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Radhika Agarwal & Divya Agarwal & Shweta Upadhyaya, 2023. "Cost optimisation of a heterogeneous server queueing system with working breakdown using PSO," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 26(3), pages 410-424.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asmita Tamuli & Dhruba Das & Amit Choudhury, 2024. "Optimizing the Performance of Multi-server Heterogeneous Queueing Systems with Dynamic Customer Behaviour," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 86(2), pages 366-414, November.
    2. KM Rashmi & S. K. Samanta, 2024. "Analysis of Two-Way Communication in $$M_1^X, M_2/G_1,G_2/1$$ M 1 X , M 2 / G 1 , G 2 / 1 Retrial Queue Under the Constant Retrial Policy," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 1-32, December.
    3. Setareh Boshrouei Shargh & Mostafa Zandieh & Ashkan Ayough & Farbod Farhadi, 2024. "Scheduling in services: a review and bibliometric analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 754-783, June.
    4. Jain, Madhu & Dhibar, Sibasish, 2023. "ANFIS and metaheuristic optimization for strategic joining policy with re-attempt and vacation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 57-84.
    5. Gabi Hanukov & Yonit Barron & Uri Yechiali, 2024. "An M/G/1 Queue with Repeated Orbit While in Service," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Meena, Rakesh Kumar & Jain, Madhu & Assad, Assif & Sethi, Rachita & Garg, Deepika, 2022. "Performance and cost comparative analysis for M/G/1 repairable machining system with N-policy vacation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 315-328.
    7. Gabi Hanukov & Uri Yechiali, 2024. "Orbit while in service," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1-32, June.
    8. K., Divya & K., Indhira, 2024. "Performance analysis and ANFIS computing of an unreliable Markovian feedback queueing model under a hybrid vacation policy," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 403-419.
    9. V. Saravanan & V. Poongothai & P. Godhandaraman, 2023. "Admission control policy of a two heterogeneous server finite capacity retrial queueing system with maintenance activity," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(4), pages 1902-1925, December.
    10. Ahuja, Anjali & Jain, Anamika & Jain, Madhu, 2022. "Transient analysis and ANFIS computing of unreliable single server queueing model with multiple stage service and functioning vacation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 464-490.
    11. Wei Xu & Liwei Liu & Linhong Li & Zhen Wang & Sabine Wittevrongel, 2023. "Analysis of a Collision-Affected M/GI/1/ /N Retrial Queuing System Considering Negative Customers and Transmission Errors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-23, August.
    12. Furman, Eugene & Diamant, Adam, 2025. "Optimal capacity planning for cloud service providers with periodic, time-varying demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(1), pages 133-146.
    13. Sanga, Sudeep Singh & Charan, Gannamaneni Sai, 2023. "Fuzzy modeling and cost optimization for machine repair problem with retrial under admission control F-policy and feedback," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 214-240.
    14. Sindhu S & Achyutha Krishnamoorthy & Dmitry Kozyrev, 2023. "A Two-Server Queue with Interdependence between Arrival and Service Processes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-25, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:27:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11009-025-10192-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.