IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jsched/v28y2025i1d10.1007_s10951-024-00827-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complexity of scheduling few types of jobs on related and unrelated machines

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Koutecký

    (Charles University)

  • Johannes Zink

    (Universität Würzburg)

Abstract

The task of scheduling jobs to machines while minimizing the total makespan, the sum of weighted completion times, or a norm of the load vector are among the oldest and most fundamental tasks in combinatorial optimization. Since all of these problems are in general NP-hard, much attention has been given to the regime where there is only a small number k of job types, but possibly the number of jobs n is large; this is the few job types, high-multiplicity regime. Despite many positive results, the hardness boundary of this regime was not understood until now. We show that makespan minimization on uniformly related machines ( $$Q|HM|C_{\max }$$ Q | H M | C max ) is NP-hard already with 6 job types, and that the related Cutting Stock problem is NP-hard already with 8 item types. For the more general unrelated machines model ( $$R|HM|C_{\max }$$ R | H M | C max ), we show that if the largest job size $$p_{\max }$$ p max or the number of jobs n is polynomially bounded in the instance size |I|, there are algorithms with complexity $$|I|^{{{\,\mathrm{\textrm{poly}}\,}}(k)}$$ | I | poly ( k ) . Our main result is that this is unlikely to be improved because $$Q||C_{\max }$$ Q | | C max is $$\mathsf {W[1]}$$ W [ 1 ] -hard parameterized by k already when n, $$p_{\max }$$ p max , and the numbers describing the machine speeds are polynomial in |I|; the same holds for $$R||C_{\max }$$ R | | C max (without machine speeds) when the job sizes matrix has rank 2. Our positive and negative results also extend to the objectives $$\ell _2$$ ℓ 2 -norm minimization of the load vector and, partially, sum of weighted completion times $$\sum w_j C_j$$ ∑ w j C j . Along the way, we answer affirmatively the question whether makespan minimization on identical machines ( $$P||C_{\max }$$ P | | C max ) is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by k, extending our understanding of this fundamental problem. Together with our hardness results for $$Q||C_{\max }$$ Q | | C max , this implies that the complexity of $$P|HM|C_{\max }$$ P | H M | C max is the only remaining open case.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Koutecký & Johannes Zink, 2025. "Complexity of scheduling few types of jobs on related and unrelated machines," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 139-156, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jsched:v:28:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10951-024-00827-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10951-024-00827-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10951-024-00827-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10951-024-00827-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hermelin, Danny & Pinedo, Michael & Shabtay, Dvir & Talmon, Nimrod, 2019. "On the parameterized tractability of single machine scheduling with rejection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 67-73.
    2. Danny Hermelin & Shlomo Karhi & Michael Pinedo & Dvir Shabtay, 2021. "New algorithms for minimizing the weighted number of tardy jobs on a single machine," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 271-287, March.
    3. P. C. Gilmore & R. E. Gomory, 1961. "A Linear Programming Approach to the Cutting-Stock Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(6), pages 849-859, December.
    4. Dušan Knop & Martin Koutecký, 2018. "Scheduling meets n-fold integer programming," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 493-503, October.
    5. S. Thomas McCormick & Scott R. Smallwood & Frits C. R. Spieksma, 2001. "A Polynomial Algorithm for Multiprocessor Scheduling with Two Job Lengths," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 31-49, February.
    6. Wayne E. Smith, 1956. "Various optimizers for single‐stage production," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1‐2), pages 59-66, March.
    7. Renhua Li & Leonie U Hempel & Tingbo Jiang, 2015. "A Non-Parametric Peak Calling Algorithm for DamID-Seq," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danny Hermelin & Dvir Shabtay & Chen Zelig & Michael Pinedo, 2022. "A general scheme for solving a large set of scheduling problems with rejection in FPT time," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 229-255, April.
    2. Danny Hermelin & Matthias Mnich & Simon Omlor, 2024. "Serial batching to minimize the weighted number of tardy jobs," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 545-556, December.
    3. Vincent T’kindt & Federico Della Croce & Mathieu Liedloff, 2022. "Moderate exponential-time algorithms for scheduling problems," 4OR, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 533-566, December.
    4. Vincent T’kindt & Federico Della Croce & Mathieu Liedloff, 2024. "Moderate exponential-time algorithms for scheduling problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 343(2), pages 753-783, December.
    5. Danny Hermelin & Shlomo Karhi & Michael Pinedo & Dvir Shabtay, 2021. "New algorithms for minimizing the weighted number of tardy jobs on a single machine," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 271-287, March.
    6. Klaus Jansen & Roberto Solis-Oba, 2011. "A Polynomial Time OPT + 1 Algorithm for the Cutting Stock Problem with a Constant Number of Object Lengths," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 743-753, November.
    7. Matthias Bentert & Robert Bredereck & Péter Györgyi & Andrzej Kaczmarczyk & Rolf Niedermeier, 2023. "A multivariate complexity analysis of the material consumption scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 369-382, August.
    8. Klaus Heeger & Danny Hermelin & George B. Mertzios & Hendrik Molter & Rolf Niedermeier & Dvir Shabtay, 2023. "Equitable scheduling on a single machine," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 209-225, April.
    9. Amanda O. C. Ayres & Betania S. C. Campello & Washington A. Oliveira & Carla T. L. S. Ghidini, 2021. "A Bi-Integrated Model for coupling lot-sizing and cutting-stock problems," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(4), pages 1047-1076, December.
    10. Marieke Quant & Marc Meertens & Hans Reijnierse, 2008. "Processing games with shared interest," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 219-228, February.
    11. Carlos V. G. C. Lima & Dieter Rautenbach & Uéverton S. Souza & Jayme L. Szwarcfiter, 2022. "On the computational complexity of the bipartizing matching problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(2), pages 1235-1256, September.
    12. Sankaran, Jayaram K., 1995. "Column generation applied to linear programs in course registration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 328-342, December.
    13. François Clautiaux & Cláudio Alves & José Valério de Carvalho & Jürgen Rietz, 2011. "New Stabilization Procedures for the Cutting Stock Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 530-545, November.
    14. de Lima, Vinícius L. & Alves, Cláudio & Clautiaux, François & Iori, Manuel & Valério de Carvalho, José M., 2022. "Arc flow formulations based on dynamic programming: Theoretical foundations and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(1), pages 3-21.
    15. Omid Shahvari & Rasaratnam Logendran & Madjid Tavana, 2022. "An efficient model-based branch-and-price algorithm for unrelated-parallel machine batching and scheduling problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 589-621, October.
    16. Letchford, Adam N. & Amaral, Andre, 2001. "Analysis of upper bounds for the Pallet Loading Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(3), pages 582-593, August.
    17. Lingfa Lu & Liqi Zhang, 2023. "Scheduling problems with rejection to minimize the k-th power of the makespan plus the total rejection cost," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 1-17, August.
    18. Lili Liu & Guochun Tang & Baoqiang Fan & Xingpeng Wang, 2015. "Two-person cooperative games on scheduling problems in outpatient pharmacy dispensing process," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 938-948, November.
    19. Ibrahim Muter & Tevfik Aytekin, 2017. "Incorporating Aggregate Diversity in Recommender Systems Using Scalable Optimization Approaches," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 405-421, August.
    20. Rostami, Borzou & Malucelli, Federico & Belotti, Pietro & Gualandi, Stefano, 2016. "Lower bounding procedure for the asymmetric quadratic traveling salesman problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(3), pages 584-592.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jsched:v:28:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10951-024-00827-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.