IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v192y2022i3d10.1007_s10957-021-01989-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Restarting Frank–Wolfe: Faster Rates under Hölderian Error Bounds

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Kerdreux

    (Zuse Institute
    Technische Universität)

  • Alexandre d’Aspremont

    (CNRS UMR 8548
    D.I. École Normale Supérieure)

  • Sebastian Pokutta

    (Zuse Institute
    Technische Universität)

Abstract

Conditional gradient algorithms (aka Frank–Wolfe algorithms) form a classical set of methods for constrained smooth convex minimization due to their simplicity, the absence of projection steps, and competitive numerical performance. While the vanilla Frank–Wolfe algorithm only ensures a worst-case rate of $${\mathcal {O}}(1/\epsilon )$$ O ( 1 / ϵ ) , various recent results have shown that for strongly convex functions on polytopes, the method can be slightly modified to achieve linear convergence. However, this still leaves a huge gap between sublinear $${\mathcal {O}}(1/\epsilon )$$ O ( 1 / ϵ ) convergence and linear $${\mathcal {O}}(\log 1/\epsilon )$$ O ( log 1 / ϵ ) convergence to reach an $$\epsilon $$ ϵ -approximate solution. Here, we present a new variant of conditional gradient algorithms that can dynamically adapt to the function’s geometric properties using restarts and smoothly interpolates between the sublinear and linear regimes. These interpolated convergence rates are obtained when the optimization problem satisfies a new type of error bounds, which we call strong Wolfe primal bounds. They combine geometric information on the constraint set with Hölderian error bounds on the objective function.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Kerdreux & Alexandre d’Aspremont & Sebastian Pokutta, 2022. "Restarting Frank–Wolfe: Faster Rates under Hölderian Error Bounds," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 192(3), pages 799-829, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:192:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10957-021-01989-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-021-01989-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-021-01989-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-021-01989-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hédy Attouch & Jérôme Bolte & Patrick Redont & Antoine Soubeyran, 2010. "Proximal Alternating Minimization and Projection Methods for Nonconvex Problems: An Approach Based on the Kurdyka-Łojasiewicz Inequality," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 438-457, May.
    2. Pierre Frankel & Guillaume Garrigos & Juan Peypouquet, 2015. "Splitting Methods with Variable Metric for Kurdyka–Łojasiewicz Functions and General Convergence Rates," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 874-900, June.
    3. Marguerite Frank & Philip Wolfe, 1956. "An algorithm for quadratic programming," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1‐2), pages 95-110, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Rinaldi & Damiano Zeffiro, 2023. "Avoiding bad steps in Frank-Wolfe variants," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 225-264, January.
    2. Bo Jiang & Tianyi Lin & Shiqian Ma & Shuzhong Zhang, 2019. "Structured nonconvex and nonsmooth optimization: algorithms and iteration complexity analysis," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 115-157, January.
    3. Masoud Ahookhosh & Le Thi Khanh Hien & Nicolas Gillis & Panagiotis Patrinos, 2021. "A Block Inertial Bregman Proximal Algorithm for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Problems with Application to Symmetric Nonnegative Matrix Tri-Factorization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 234-258, July.
    4. Yaohua Hu & Chong Li & Kaiwen Meng & Xiaoqi Yang, 2021. "Linear convergence of inexact descent method and inexact proximal gradient algorithms for lower-order regularization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 79(4), pages 853-883, April.
    5. Radu Ioan Boţ & Ernö Robert Csetnek & Szilárd Csaba László, 2016. "An inertial forward–backward algorithm for the minimization of the sum of two nonconvex functions," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 4(1), pages 3-25, February.
    6. Maryam Yashtini, 2021. "Multi-block Nonconvex Nonsmooth Proximal ADMM: Convergence and Rates Under Kurdyka–Łojasiewicz Property," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 190(3), pages 966-998, September.
    7. Maryam Yashtini, 2022. "Convergence and rate analysis of a proximal linearized ADMM for nonconvex nonsmooth optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 913-939, December.
    8. Silvia Bonettini & Peter Ochs & Marco Prato & Simone Rebegoldi, 2023. "An abstract convergence framework with application to inertial inexact forward–backward methods," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 319-362, March.
    9. Emilie Chouzenoux & Jean-Christophe Pesquet & Audrey Repetti, 2016. "A block coordinate variable metric forward–backward algorithm," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 457-485, November.
    10. Radu Ioan Bot & Dang-Khoa Nguyen, 2020. "The Proximal Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers in the Nonconvex Setting: Convergence Analysis and Rates," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 682-712, May.
    11. S. Bonettini & M. Prato & S. Rebegoldi, 2018. "A block coordinate variable metric linesearch based proximal gradient method," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 71(1), pages 5-52, September.
    12. Lei Yang, 2024. "Proximal Gradient Method with Extrapolation and Line Search for a Class of Non-convex and Non-smooth Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 200(1), pages 68-103, January.
    13. Szilárd Csaba László, 2023. "A Forward–Backward Algorithm With Different Inertial Terms for Structured Non-Convex Minimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 198(1), pages 387-427, July.
    14. Zehui Jia & Xue Gao & Xingju Cai & Deren Han, 2021. "Local Linear Convergence of the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers for Nonconvex Separable Optimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 1-25, January.
    15. Guillaume Sagnol & Edouard Pauwels, 2019. "An unexpected connection between Bayes A-optimal designs and the group lasso," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 565-584, April.
    16. Abdelfettah Laouzai & Rachid Ouafi, 2022. "A prediction model for atmospheric pollution reduction from urban traffic," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 566-584, February.
    17. Le Thi Khanh Hien & Duy Nhat Phan & Nicolas Gillis, 2022. "Inertial alternating direction method of multipliers for non-convex non-smooth optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 83(1), pages 247-285, September.
    18. Chou, Chang-Chi & Chiang, Wen-Chu & Chen, Albert Y., 2022. "Emergency medical response in mass casualty incidents considering the traffic congestions in proximity on-site and hospital delays," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    19. Beck, Yasmine & Ljubić, Ivana & Schmidt, Martin, 2023. "A survey on bilevel optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 401-426.
    20. J. X. Cruz Neto & P. R. Oliveira & A. Soubeyran & J. C. O. Souza, 2020. "A generalized proximal linearized algorithm for DC functions with application to the optimal size of the firm problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 289(2), pages 313-339, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:192:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10957-021-01989-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.