IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v162y2014i1d10.1007_s10957-013-0471-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Low-Thrust Orbital Maneuvers via Indirect Swarming Method

Author

Listed:
  • Mauro Pontani

    (University “La Sapienza”)

  • Bruce Conway

    (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

Abstract

In the last decades, heuristic techniques have become established as suitable approaches for solving optimal control problems. Unlike deterministic methods, they do not suffer from locality of the results and do not require any starting guess to yield an optimal solution. The main disadvantages of heuristic algorithms are the lack of any convergence proof and the capability of yielding only a near optimal solution, if a particular representation for control variables is adopted. This paper describes the indirect swarming method, based on the joint use of the analytical necessary conditions for optimality, together with a simple heuristic technique, namely the particle swarm algorithm. This methodology circumvents the previously mentioned disadvantages of using heuristic approaches, while retaining their advantageous feature of not requiring any starting guess to generate an optimal solution. The particle swarm algorithm is chosen among the different available heuristic techniques, due to its apparent simplicity and the recent promising results reported in the scientific literature. Two different orbital maneuvering problems are considered and solved with great numerical accuracy, and this testifies to the effectiveness of the indirect swarming algorithm in solving low-thrust trajectory optimization problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Mauro Pontani & Bruce Conway, 2014. "Optimal Low-Thrust Orbital Maneuvers via Indirect Swarming Method," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 272-292, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:162:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s10957-013-0471-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-013-0471-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-013-0471-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-013-0471-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David G. Hull, 2011. "Optimal Guidance for Quasi-planar Lunar Ascent," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 353-372, November.
    2. A. Miele & T. Wang, 1997. "Optimal Trajectories for Earth-to-Mars Flight," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 467-499, December.
    3. Bruce A. Conway, 2012. "A Survey of Methods Available for the Numerical Optimization of Continuous Dynamic Systems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 271-306, February.
    4. A. Miele & T. Wang, 2003. "Multiple-Subarc Gradient-Restoration Algorithm, Part 1: Algorithm Structure," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 1-17, January.
    5. A. Miele & T. Wang, 2003. "Multiple-Subarc Gradient-Restoration Algorithm, Part 2: Application to a Multistage Launch Vehicle Design," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 19-39, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mauro Pontani, 2021. "Optimal Space Trajectories with Multiple Coast Arcs Using Modified Equinoctial Elements," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 191(2), pages 545-574, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. Miele & M. W. Weeks & M. Ciarcià, 2007. "Optimal Trajectories for Spacecraft Rendezvous," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 132(3), pages 353-376, March.
    2. A. Miele & T. Wang & J. A. Mathwig & M. Ciarcià, 2010. "Collision Avoidance for an Aircraft in Abort Landing: Trajectory Optimization and Guidance," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 146(2), pages 233-254, August.
    3. A. Miele & M. Ciarcià, 2008. "Optimal Starting Conditions for the Rendezvous Maneuver, Part 1: Optimal Control Approach," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 593-624, June.
    4. A. Miele & T. Wang, 2005. "Maximin Approach to the Ship Collision Avoidance Problem via Multiple-Subarc Sequential Gradient-Restoration Algorithm," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 29-53, January.
    5. N. Yokoyama & S. Suzuki & T. Tsuchiya, 2008. "Convergence Acceleration of Direct Trajectory Optimization Using Novel Hessian Calculation Methods," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 136(3), pages 297-319, March.
    6. A. Miele & T. Wang, 2006. "Optimal Trajectories and Guidance Schemes for Ship Collision Avoidance," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 129(1), pages 1-21, April.
    7. A. Miele & M. Ciarcià & M. W. Weeks, 2007. "Guidance Trajectories for Spacecraft Rendezvous," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 132(3), pages 377-400, March.
    8. Mauro Pontani, 2021. "Optimal Space Trajectories with Multiple Coast Arcs Using Modified Equinoctial Elements," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 191(2), pages 545-574, December.
    9. Klaus Werner Schmidt & Öncü Hazır, 2019. "Formulation and solution of an optimal control problem for industrial project control," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 280(1), pages 337-350, September.
    10. Calvin Kielas-Jensen & Venanzio Cichella & David Casbeer & Satyanarayana Gupta Manyam & Isaac Weintraub, 2021. "Persistent Monitoring by Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using Bernstein Polynomials," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 191(2), pages 899-916, December.
    11. David Ottesen & Ryan P. Russell, 2021. "Unconstrained Direct Optimization of Spacecraft Trajectories Using Many Embedded Lambert Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 191(2), pages 634-674, December.
    12. Alena Vagaská & Miroslav Gombár & Ľuboslav Straka, 2022. "Selected Mathematical Optimization Methods for Solving Problems of Engineering Practice," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    13. A. Miele & T. Wang, 2003. "Multiple-Subarc Gradient-Restoration Algorithm, Part 1: Algorithm Structure," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Miguel G. Villarreal-Cervantes, 2017. "Approximate and Widespread Pareto Solutions in the Structure-Control Design of Mechatronic Systems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 173(2), pages 628-657, May.
    15. N. Koeppen & I. M. Ross & L. C. Wilcox & R. J. Proulx, 2019. "Fast Mesh Refinement in Pseudospectral Optimal Control," Papers 1904.12992, arXiv.org.
    16. Sheng Zhang & En-Mi Yong & Wei-Qi Qian & Kai-Feng He, 2019. "A Variation Evolving Method for Optimal Control Computation," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 183(1), pages 246-270, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:162:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s10957-013-0471-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.