IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v137y2008i3d10.1007_s10957-007-9347-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Starting Conditions for the Rendezvous Maneuver, Part 1: Optimal Control Approach

Author

Listed:
  • A. Miele

    (Rice University)

  • M. Ciarcià

    (Rice University)

Abstract

We consider the three-dimensional rendezvous between two spacecraft: a target spacecraft on a circular orbit around the Earth and a chaser spacecraft initially on some elliptical orbit yet to be determined. The chaser spacecraft has variable mass, limited thrust, and its trajectory is governed by three controls, one determining the thrust magnitude and two determining the thrust direction. We seek the time history of the controls in such a way that the propellant mass required to execute the rendezvous maneuver is minimized. Two cases are considered: (i) time-to-rendezvous free and (ii) time-to-rendezvous given, respectively equivalent to (i) free angular travel and (ii) fixed angular travel for the target spacecraft. The above problem has been studied by several authors under the assumption that the initial separation coordinates and the initial separation velocities are given, hence known initial conditions for the chaser spacecraft. In this paper, it is assumed that both the initial separation coordinates and initial separation velocities are free except for the requirement that the initial chaser-to-target distance is given so as to prevent the occurrence of trivial solutions. Analyses performed with the multiple-subarc sequential gradient-restoration algorithm for optimal control problems show that the fuel-optimal trajectory is zero-bang, namely it is characterized by two subarcs: a long coasting zero-thrust subarc followed by a short powered max-thrust braking subarc. While the thrust direction of the powered subarc is continuously variable for the optimal trajectory, its replacement with a constant (yet optimized) thrust direction produces a very efficient guidance trajectory: Indeed, for all values of the initial distance, the fuel required by the guidance trajectory is within less than one percent of the fuel required by the optimal trajectory. For the guidance trajectory, because of the replacement of the variable thrust direction of the powered subarc with a constant thrust direction, the optimal control problem degenerates into a mathematical programming problem with a relatively small number of degrees of freedom, more precisely: three for case (i) time-to-rendezvous free and two for case (ii) time-to-rendezvous given. In particular, we consider the rendezvous between the Space Shuttle (chaser) and the International Space Station (target). Once a given initial distance SS-to-ISS is preselected, the present work supplies not only the best initial conditions for the rendezvous trajectory, but simultaneously the corresponding final conditions for the ascent trajectory.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Miele & M. Ciarcià, 2008. "Optimal Starting Conditions for the Rendezvous Maneuver, Part 1: Optimal Control Approach," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 593-624, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:137:y:2008:i:3:d:10.1007_s10957-007-9347-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-007-9347-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-007-9347-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-007-9347-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Miele & M. W. Weeks & M. Ciarcià, 2007. "Optimal Trajectories for Spacecraft Rendezvous," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 132(3), pages 353-376, March.
    2. A. Miele & T. Wang, 2003. "Multiple-Subarc Gradient-Restoration Algorithm, Part 1: Algorithm Structure," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 1-17, January.
    3. A. Miele & M. Ciarcià & M. W. Weeks, 2007. "Guidance Trajectories for Spacecraft Rendezvous," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 132(3), pages 377-400, March.
    4. A. Miele & T. Wang, 2003. "Multiple-Subarc Gradient-Restoration Algorithm, Part 2: Application to a Multistage Launch Vehicle Design," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 19-39, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A. Miele & M. Ciarcià, 2008. "Optimal Starting Conditions for the Rendezvous Maneuver, Part 2: Mathematical Programming Approach," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 625-639, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. Miele & M. W. Weeks & M. Ciarcià, 2007. "Optimal Trajectories for Spacecraft Rendezvous," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 132(3), pages 353-376, March.
    2. A. Miele & M. Ciarcià & M. W. Weeks, 2007. "Guidance Trajectories for Spacecraft Rendezvous," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 132(3), pages 377-400, March.
    3. Mauro Pontani & Bruce Conway, 2014. "Optimal Low-Thrust Orbital Maneuvers via Indirect Swarming Method," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 272-292, July.
    4. Y.-K. Chang & J. J. Nieto & W.-S. Li, 2009. "On Impulsive Hyperbolic Differential Inclusions with Nonlocal Initial Conditions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 431-442, March.
    5. A. Miele & T. Wang & J. A. Mathwig & M. Ciarcià, 2010. "Collision Avoidance for an Aircraft in Abort Landing: Trajectory Optimization and Guidance," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 146(2), pages 233-254, August.
    6. A. Miele & M. Ciarcià, 2008. "Optimal Starting Conditions for the Rendezvous Maneuver, Part 2: Mathematical Programming Approach," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 625-639, June.
    7. A. Miele & T. Wang, 2005. "Maximin Approach to the Ship Collision Avoidance Problem via Multiple-Subarc Sequential Gradient-Restoration Algorithm," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 29-53, January.
    8. N. Yokoyama & S. Suzuki & T. Tsuchiya, 2008. "Convergence Acceleration of Direct Trajectory Optimization Using Novel Hessian Calculation Methods," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 136(3), pages 297-319, March.
    9. A. Miele & T. Wang, 2006. "Optimal Trajectories and Guidance Schemes for Ship Collision Avoidance," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 129(1), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Sandeep K. Singh & Brian D. Anderson & Ehsan Taheri & John L. Junkins, 2021. "Low-Thrust Transfers to Southern $$L_2$$ L 2 Near-Rectilinear Halo Orbits Facilitated by Invariant Manifolds," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 191(2), pages 517-544, December.
    11. A. Miele & T. Wang, 2003. "Multiple-Subarc Gradient-Restoration Algorithm, Part 1: Algorithm Structure," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Fliege, Jörg & Kaparis, Konstantinos & Khosravi, Banafsheh, 2012. "Operations research in the space industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 233-240.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:137:y:2008:i:3:d:10.1007_s10957-007-9347-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.