IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v36y2025i5d10.1007_s10845-023-02229-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-agent cooperative swarm learning for dynamic layout optimisation of reconfigurable robotic assembly cells based on digital twin

Author

Listed:
  • Likun Wang

    (University of Nottingham)

  • Zi Wang

    (University of Nottingham)

  • Kevin Gumma

    (University of Nottingham)

  • Alison Turner

    (University of Nottingham)

  • Svetan Ratchev

    (University of Nottingham)

Abstract

To meet the requirement of product variety and short production cycle, reconfigurable manufacturing system is considered as an effective solution in addressing current challenges, such as increasing customisation, high flexibility and dynamic market demand. Dynamic factory layout design and optimisation are the crucial factors in response to rapid change in the mechanical structure, software and hardware integration, as well as production capability and functionality adjustment. Nevertheless, in the current research, the layout design for reconfigurable manufacturing systems is usually simplified with autonomous devices being regarded as 2D shapes. Issues such as overlapping and transportation distance are also addressed in an approximate form. In this paper, we present a novel multi-agent cooperative swarm learning framework for dynamic layout optimisation of reconfigurable robotic assembly cells. Based on its digital twin established in the proposed learning environment (constructed in Visual Components and controlled by TWINCAT), the optimisation framework uses 3D digital representation of the facility models with minimal approximation. Moreover, instead of using a traditional centralised learning manner, multi-agent system could provide an alternative way to address the layout issues combined with the proposed decentralised multi-agent cooperative swarm learning. In order to verify the application feasibility of the learning framework, two aerospace manufacturing use cases were implemented. In the first use case, the layout compactness is reduced by 3.8 times compared with the initial layout setting, the simulated production time is reduced by 2.3 times, and the rearrangement cost decreased by 33.4 $$\%$$ % . In addition, all manufacturing activity within the cell can be achieved with a feasible robot path, meaning without any joint limits, reachability or singularity issue at each key assembly point. In the second use case, we demonstrated that with the proposed dynamic layout optimisation framework, it is possible to flexibly adjust learning objectives by selecting various weight parameters among layout compactness, rearrangement cost and production time.

Suggested Citation

  • Likun Wang & Zi Wang & Kevin Gumma & Alison Turner & Svetan Ratchev, 2025. "Multi-agent cooperative swarm learning for dynamic layout optimisation of reconfigurable robotic assembly cells based on digital twin," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(5), pages 2959-2982, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:36:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s10845-023-02229-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-023-02229-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-023-02229-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-023-02229-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dahlbeck, Mirko, 2021. "A mixed-integer linear programming approach for the T-row and the multi-bay facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 443-462.
    2. Silu Liu & Zeqiang Zhang & Chao Guan & Lixia Zhu & Min Zhang & Peng Guo, 2021. "An improved fireworks algorithm for the constrained single-row facility layout problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(8), pages 2309-2327, April.
    3. Akash Tayal & Surya Prakash Singh, 2018. "Integrating big data analytic and hybrid firefly-chaotic simulated annealing approach for facility layout problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 489-514, November.
    4. Abderraouf Maoudj & Brahim Bouzouia & Abdelfetah Hentout & Ahmed Kouider & Redouane Toumi, 2019. "Distributed multi-agent scheduling and control system for robotic flexible assembly cells," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1629-1644, April.
    5. Ali Derakhshan Asl & Kuan Yew Wong, 2017. "Solving unequal-area static and dynamic facility layout problems using modified particle swarm optimization," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1317-1336, August.
    6. Mirco Peron & Giuseppe Fragapane & Fabio Sgarbossa & Michael Kay, 2020. "Digital Facility Layout Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    7. McKendall Jr., Alan R. & Hakobyan, Artak, 2010. "Heuristics for the dynamic facility layout problem with unequal-area departments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 171-182, February.
    8. Wilma Polini & Andrea Corrado, 2020. "Digital twin of composite assembly manufacturing process," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(17), pages 5238-5252, September.
    9. Xie, Yue & Zhou, Shenghan & Xiao, Yiyong & Kulturel-Konak, Sadan & Konak, Abdullah, 2018. "A β-accurate linearization method of Euclidean distance for the facility layout problem with heterogeneous distance metrics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 26-38.
    10. Xiu Ning & Pingke Li, 2018. "A cross-entropy approach to the single row facility layout problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(11), pages 3781-3794, June.
    11. Jerzy Grobelny & Rafal Michalski, 2017. "A novel version of simulated annealing based on linguistic patterns for solving facility layout problems," WORking papers in Management Science (WORMS) WORMS/17/07, Department of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
    12. Pourvaziri, Hani & Pierreval, Henri, 2017. "Dynamic facility layout problem based on open queuing network theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 538-553.
    13. Pablo Pérez-Gosende & Josefa Mula & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero, 2021. "Facility layout planning. An extended literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(12), pages 3777-3816, June.
    14. Friedrich, Christian & Klausnitzer, Armin & Lasch, Rainer, 2018. "Integrated slicing tree approach for solving the facility layout problem with input and output locations based on contour distance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(3), pages 837-851.
    15. Jingyang Zhou & Peter E.D. Love & Kok Lay Teo & Hanbin Luo, 2017. "An exact penalty function method for optimising QAP formulation in facility layout problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(10), pages 2913-2929, May.
    16. Xing Wan & Xingquan Zuo & Xiaodong Li & Xinchao Zhao, 2022. "A hybrid multiobjective GRASP for a multi-row facility layout problem with extra clearances," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(3), pages 957-976, February.
    17. Friedrich, C. & Klausnitzer, A. & Lasch, R., 2018. "Integrated slicing tree approach for solving the facility layout problem with input and output locations based on contour distance," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 94867, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    18. Liu, Jingfa & Wang, Dawen & He, Kun & Xue, Yu, 2017. "Combining Wang–Landau sampling algorithm and heuristics for solving the unequal-area dynamic facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1052-1063.
    19. Sicheng Zhang & Tak Nam Wong, 2017. "Flexible job-shop scheduling/rescheduling in dynamic environment: a hybrid MAS/ACO approach," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(11), pages 3173-3196, June.
    20. Asef-Vaziri, Ardavan & Kazemi, Morteza, 2018. "Covering and connectivity constraints in loop-based formulation of material flow network design in facility layout," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 1033-1044.
    21. Abdelkrim R. Yelles-Chaouche & Evgeny Gurevsky & Nadjib Brahimi & Alexandre Dolgui, 2021. "Reconfigurable manufacturing systems from an optimisation perspective: a focused review of literature," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(21), pages 6400-6418, November.
    22. Mariem Besbes & Marc Zolghadri & Roberta Costa Affonso & Faouzi Masmoudi & Mohamed Haddar, 2021. "3D facility layout problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1065-1090, April.
    23. Ignacio Eguia & Jose Carlos Molina & Sebastian Lozano & Jesus Racero, 2017. "Cell design and multi-period machine loading in cellular reconfigurable manufacturing systems with alternative routing," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(10), pages 2775-2790, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qiaoyu Zhang & Yan Lin, 2024. "Integrating multi-agent reinforcement learning and 3D A* search for facility layout problem considering connector-assembly," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(7), pages 3393-3418, October.
    2. Pablo Pérez-Gosende & Josefa Mula & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero, 2020. "Overview of Dynamic Facility Layout Planning as a Sustainability Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Mariem Besbes & Marc Zolghadri & Roberta Costa Affonso & Faouzi Masmoudi & Mohamed Haddar, 2020. "A methodology for solving facility layout problem considering barriers: genetic algorithm coupled with A* search," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 615-640, March.
    4. Daria Leiber & David Eickholt & Anh-Tu Vuong & Gunther Reinhart, 2022. "Simulation-based layout optimization for multi-station assembly lines," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 537-554, February.
    5. Mehmet Burak Şenol & Ekrem Alper Murat, 2023. "A sequential solution heuristic for continuous facility layout problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(1), pages 355-377, January.
    6. Palubeckis, Gintaras, 2025. "A fast local search based memetic algorithm for the parallel row ordering problem," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 486(C).
    7. Rui Li & Yali Chen & Jinzhao Song & Ming Li & Yu Yu, 2023. "Multi-Objective Optimization Method of Industrial Workshop Layout from the Perspective of Low Carbon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Hua, Hao & Hovestadt, Ludger & Tang, Peng & Li, Biao, 2019. "Integer programming for urban design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(3), pages 1125-1137.
    9. Xuan Jing & Xifan Yao & Min Liu & Jiajun Zhou, 2024. "Multi-agent reinforcement learning based on graph convolutional network for flexible job shop scheduling," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 75-93, January.
    10. Pourvaziri, Hani & Pierreval, Henri & Marian, Helene, 2021. "Integrating facility layout design and aisle structure in manufacturing systems: Formulation and exact solution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 499-513.
    11. Didden, Jeroen B.H.C. & Dang, Quang-Vinh & Adan, Ivo J.B.F., 2024. "Enhancing stability and robustness in online machine shop scheduling: A multi-agent system and negotiation-based approach for handling machine downtime in industry 4.0," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(2), pages 569-583.
    12. Siyu Xu & Yufei Wang & Xiao Feng, 2020. "Plant Layout Optimization for Chemical Industry Considering Inner Frame Structure Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Gintaras Palubeckis & Armantas Ostreika & Jūratė Platužienė, 2022. "A Variable Neighborhood Search Approach for the Dynamic Single Row Facility Layout Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-27, June.
    14. Mariem Besbes & Marc Zolghadri & Roberta Costa Affonso & Faouzi Masmoudi & Mohamed Haddar, 2021. "3D facility layout problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1065-1090, April.
    15. Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee & Alireza Goli & Abbas Mardani, 2023. "A novel two-echelon hierarchical location-allocation-routing optimization for green energy-efficient logistics systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 795-823, May.
    16. Benjamin Heinbach & Peter Burggräf & Johannes Wagner, 2024. "gym-flp: A Python Package for Training Reinforcement Learning Algorithms on Facility Layout Problems," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-26, March.
    17. Dahlbeck, Mirko & Fischer, Anja & Fischer, Frank & Hungerländer, Philipp & Maier, Kerstin, 2023. "Exact approaches for the combined cell layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 530-546.
    18. Jeoung Yul Lee & Ilkhom Okmirzaevich Irisboev & Yeon-Sik Ryu, 2021. "Literature Review on Digitalization in Facilities Management and Facilities Management Performance Measurement: Contribution of Industry 4.0 in the Global Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-29, December.
    19. Yanmeng Tao & Ying Yang & Haoran Li & Shuaian Wang, 2025. "Optimization of Tank Cleaning Station Locations and Task Assignments in Inland Waterway Networks: A Multi-Period MIP Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-35, May.
    20. Arindam Das, 2023. "The Relationship between International Trade in Industry 4.0 Products and National-Level Sustainability Performance: An Empirical Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:36:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s10845-023-02229-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.