IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v35y2024i4d10.1007_s10845-023-02141-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process parameter optimization for reproducible fabrication of layer porosity quality of 3D-printed tissue scaffold

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Chung Chee Law

    (Virginia Tech)

  • Rongxuan Wang

    (Virginia Tech)

  • Jihoon Chung

    (Virginia Tech)

  • Ezgi Kucukdeger

    (Virginia Tech)

  • Yang Liu

    (Virginia Tech)

  • Ted Barron

    (Virginia Tech
    Virginia Tech)

  • Blake N. Johnson

    (Virginia Tech)

  • Zhenyu Kong

    (Virginia Tech)

Abstract

Bioprinting, or bio-additive manufacturing, is a critical emerging field for transforming tissue engineering regenerative medicine to produce biological constructs and scaffolds in a layerwise fashion. Geometric accuracy and spatial distribution of scaffold porosity are critical factors associated with the quality of bio-printed tissue scaffolds. Determining optimal process parameters for tissue scaffold microextrusion 3D printing by traditional trial-and-error approaches is costly, labor-intensive, and time-consuming. In addition, effective in-process sensing techniques are needed to observe internal multilayer scaffold structures, such as porosity. Therefore, an in-process sensing platform based on integrated light scanning and microscopy was proposed to acquire in-process layer information during the fabrication of polymeric and hydrogel scaffolds. This work implements a customized sensing platform consisting of a 3D scanner and digital microscope for in-process quality monitoring of tissue scaffold biofabrication that provides in situ characterization of each printed layer’s quality conditions (e.g., porosity). The proposed sensor-based in-process quality monitoring system can accurately capture layerwise porosity quality. Design of experiments (DoE) experimental analysis yielded a set of optimal process parameters that significantly improved the geometric accuracy and compressive modulus of thermoplastic- and hydrogel-based tissue scaffolds. The developed sensing system coupled with the DoE approach enables effective process parameter optimization to fabricate porous 3D-printed tissue scaffolds. It can significantly improve the quality and reproducibility of research associated with porous 3D-printed products, such as tissue scaffolds and membranes.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Chung Chee Law & Rongxuan Wang & Jihoon Chung & Ezgi Kucukdeger & Yang Liu & Ted Barron & Blake N. Johnson & Zhenyu Kong, 2024. "Process parameter optimization for reproducible fabrication of layer porosity quality of 3D-printed tissue scaffold," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 1825-1844, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:35:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10845-023-02141-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-023-02141-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-023-02141-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-023-02141-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:35:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10845-023-02141-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.