IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v32y2021i8d10.1007_s10845-021-01774-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of image segmentation techniques for layup defect detection in the Automated Fiber Placement process

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Meister

    (German Aerospace Center (DLR))

  • Mahdieu A. M. Wermes

    (German Aerospace Center (DLR))

  • Jan Stüve

    (German Aerospace Center (DLR))

  • Roger M. Groves

    (Delft University of Technology)

Abstract

The aerospace industry has established the Automated Fiber Placement process as a common technique for manufacturing fibre reinforced components. In this process multiple composite tows are placed simultaneously onto a tool. Currently in such processes manual testing requires often up to 50% of the manufacturing duration. Moreover, the accuracy of quality assurance varies significantly with the inspector in charge. Thus, inspection automation provides an effective way to increase efficiency. However, to achieve a proper inspection performance, the segmentation of layup defects need to be examined. In order to improve such defect detection systems, this paper performs a comprehensive ranking of segmentation techniques. Thus, 29 statistical, spectral and structural algorithms from related work were evaluated based on nine substantial criteria as assessed from literature and process requirements. For reasons of determinism and easy technology transferability without the need of much training data, the development of new Machine Learning algorithms is not part of this paper. Afterwards, seven of the most auspicious algorithms were studied experimentally. Therefore, laser line scan sensor depth maps from fibre placement defects were utilised. Furthermore noisy images were generated and applied for testing algorithm robustness. The test data contained five defect categories with 50 samples per class. It was concluded that Adaptive Thresholding and Cell Wise Standard Deviation Thresholding work best yielding detection accuracies mostly $$> 97$$ > 97 %. Noteworthy is that influenced input data can affect the detection results. Feasible algorithms with sensible parameter settings were able to perform reliable defect segmentation for layed material.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Meister & Mahdieu A. M. Wermes & Jan Stüve & Roger M. Groves, 2021. "Review of image segmentation techniques for layup defect detection in the Automated Fiber Placement process," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(8), pages 2099-2119, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:32:y:2021:i:8:d:10.1007_s10845-021-01774-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-021-01774-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-021-01774-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-021-01774-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastian Meister & Nantwin Möller & Jan Stüve & Roger M. Groves, 2021. "Synthetic image data augmentation for fibre layup inspection processes: Techniques to enhance the data set," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 1767-1789, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Swarit Anand Singh & K. A. Desai, 2023. "Automated surface defect detection framework using machine vision and convolutional neural networks," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1995-2011, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:32:y:2021:i:8:d:10.1007_s10845-021-01774-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.