IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joimai/v26y2025i1d10.1007_s12134-024-01187-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contestation of State Role in Ethnoscapes: A Contrast Between Community Centrism and Dirigisme in Little India Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Nagathisen Katahenggam

    (Taylor’s University)

  • Preveena Balakrishnan

    (Penang State Intangible Cultural Heritage Researcher)

  • Victor Eng-lye Wee

    (Taylor’s University)

  • Puvaneswaran Kunasekaran

    (Universiti Putra Malaysia)

  • Neethiahnanthan M. Ari Ragavan

    (Taylor’s University)

Abstract

This paper examines how ethnoscape contests state functions in touristification. It compares a state-led ethnoscape governance model to a community-based, participatory approach. Although cultural tourism is increasingly recognised for its tourism and commercial value, it also serves to build national identity. Little India in Singapore and George Town, Malaysia, have divergent priorities despite their similar roots. Singapore’s Little India combines ethno-tourism with a state constructed identity. Meanwhile, Little India of George Town is a socio-economic urbanspace with little official intervention. This brings in the question of the function of the state in contesting the various functions of ethnoscapes. Hence, this study will examine how the state places Indian identity for heritage tourism in Singapore and compare it to George Town. It questions ethnoscape governance with a dirigistic state approach. Then, it examines the challenges of a community-led ethnoscape governance against a dirigistic model. Semi-structured interviews were used to study the stories, experiences, and practices of various stakeheholders in both locations using interpretative epistemology to develop relevant themes. Based on the analysis, the rationale for pragmatism in the governance of ethnoscapes is discussed. Also, the viability of paternalistic approach by the state in ethnoscape management in George Town is posited.

Suggested Citation

  • Nagathisen Katahenggam & Preveena Balakrishnan & Victor Eng-lye Wee & Puvaneswaran Kunasekaran & Neethiahnanthan M. Ari Ragavan, 2025. "Contestation of State Role in Ethnoscapes: A Contrast Between Community Centrism and Dirigisme in Little India Governance," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 317-335, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joimai:v:26:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12134-024-01187-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s12134-024-01187-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12134-024-01187-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12134-024-01187-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liz Richardson & Catherine Durose & Beth Perry, 2019. "Three tyrannies of participatory governance," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 123-143, April.
    2. Xue, Lan & Kerstetter, Deborah & Hunt, Carter, 2017. "Tourism development and changing rural identity in China," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 170-182.
    3. Lin, Dan & Simmons, David, 2017. "Structured inter-network collaboration: Public participation in tourism planning in Southern China," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 315-328.
    4. Millner, Naomi & Peñagaricano, Irune & Fernandez, Maria & Snook, Laura K., 2020. "The politics of participation: Negotiating relationships through community forestry in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nanping Feng & Fenfen Wei & Kevin H. Zhang & Dongxiao Gu, 2018. "Innovating Rural Tourism Targeting Poverty Alleviation through a Multi-Industries Integration Network: the Case of Zhuanshui Village, Anhui Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Jing Guan & Jun Gao & Chaozhi Zhang, 2019. "Food Heritagization and Sustainable Rural Tourism Destination: The Case of China’s Yuanjia Village," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Huichao Feng & Jieling Xiao, 2024. "(Re)shaping the Tourists’ Imagined Identity of Mosuo towards Sustainable Ethnic Tourism Development in Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Hiroyuki Kajihara & Su Zhang & Wonhee You & Qingwen Min, 2018. "Concerns and Opportunities around Cultural Heritage in East Asian Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Trejos, Bernardo & Flores, Juan Carlos, 2021. "Influence of property rights on performance of community-based forest devolution policies in Honduras," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    6. A Fronzetti Colladon & B Guardabascio & R Innarella, 2021. "Using social network and semantic analysis to analyze online travel forums and forecast tourism demand," Papers 2105.07727, arXiv.org.
    7. Lai, Zhaohao & Chen, Meiqiu & Liu, Taoju, 2020. "Changes in and prospects for cultivated land use since the reform and opening up in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    8. Chen, Zhe & Ryan, Chris & Zhang, Yingsha, 2022. "Generational challenges of resident-destination bonding," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. Jianwei Qian & Xue Li, 2024. "Perceived Value, Place Identity, and Behavioral Intention: An Investigation on the Influence Mechanism of Sustainable Development in Rural Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Michael Otieno Oloo & Prof. W. Okumu Bigambo & Dr. Masibo Lumala, 2023. "Public Participation in the Governance of Busia County – Kenya," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(3), pages 10-22, March.
    11. Giefer, Madeline M. & An, Li, 2022. "Divergent impacts of the grain to green program, landholdings, and demographic factors on livelihood diversification in rural China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    12. Yan, Jinming & Zhang, Dongsheng & Xia, Fangzhou, 2021. "Evaluation of village land use planning risks in green concepts: The case of Qiwangfen Village in Beijing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    13. Jiaxing Cui & Ruihao Li & Lingyu Zhang & Ying Jing, 2021. "Spatially Illustrating Leisure Agriculture: Empirical Evidence from Picking Orchards in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Keke Sun & Zeyu Xing & Xia Cao & Weijia Li, 2021. "The Regime of Rural Ecotourism Stakeholders in Poverty-Stricken Areas of China: Implications for Rural Revitalization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-28, September.
    15. Ong, Chin-Ee & Liu, Yi, 2022. "State-directed tourism urbanisation in China's Hengqin," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    16. Yuqing Zhang & Chengcheng Zhan & Hui Wang & Ya Gao, 2022. "Evolution and reconstruction of settlement space in tourist islands: a case study of Dachangshan Island, Changhai County," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 9777-9808, August.
    17. Huizhan Wang & Xinru Lu, 2025. "A Comparative Study on the Promoting Effects of Different Tourism Development Models on Rural Revitalization: Case Studies from Two Typical Villages in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-32, January.
    18. Bernhard Fabian Bichler & Magdalena Lösch, 2019. "Collaborative Governance in Tourism: Empirical Insights into a Community-Oriented Destination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-19, November.
    19. repec:ags:aaea22:335972 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Kaowen Grace Chang & Hungju Chien & Hungyao Cheng & Hsin-i Chen, 2018. "The Impacts of Tourism Development in Rural Indigenous Destinations: An Investigation of the Local Residents’ Perception Using Choice Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    21. Rana, Pushpendra & Miller, Daniel C., 2021. "Predicting the long-term social and ecological impacts of tree-planting programs: Evidence from northern India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joimai:v:26:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12134-024-01187-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.