Author
Abstract
In recent years, collaborative robots have emerged as a prominent research area in the modern work environment of the knowledge-based economy. However, the systematic and comprehensive analysis of literature on collaborative robots, particularly in relation to the knowledge-based economy, has been lacking. This study employs bibliometric analysis to delve into the trends and knowledge structure within the field of collaborative robots, with the aim of gaining a more comprehensive understanding of the interplay between collaborative robot technology and the knowledge-based economy. Analyzing 900 records from the Web of Science database, the research reveals an exponential growth in collaborative robots’ research since 2016, partly attributed to the influence of the ISO/TS 15066 standard. However, this growth trend is not only confined to the academic sphere but has also exerted profound influences in the industrial sector. Taking highly cited research outcomes as an example, these findings not only spark extensive discussions within academia but also find practical applications in the industrial realm, offering crucial support for production and innovation. The research in the field of collaborative robots encompasses various key topics such as control, perception, optimization, design, and human factors engineering, reflecting its interdisciplinary nature. Through keyword co-occurrence analysis, researchers can gain a better understanding of research hotspots, trends, and application directions. This study fills a gap in the literature on bibliometric research in the field of collaborative robots, providing foundational data and research categorization for initial investigations. It underscores the significance of collaborative robot technology in the context of the knowledge-based economy and offers potential research directions for the future.
Suggested Citation
Dong Liu & Sangbum Son, 2025.
"Trends and Knowledge Structure in Collaborative Robot Research in the Knowledge Economy Era: A Bibliometric Analysis,"
Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 3948-3969, March.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s13132-024-02139-w
DOI: 10.1007/s13132-024-02139-w
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s13132-024-02139-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.