IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v59y2014i2p227-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lattice preconditioning for the real relaxation branch-and-bound approach for integer least squares problems

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel Anjos
  • Xiao-Wen Chang
  • Wen-Yang Ku

Abstract

The integer least squares problem is an important problem that arises in numerous applications. We propose a real relaxation-based branch-and-bound (RRBB) method for this problem. First, we define a quantity called the distance to integrality, propose it as a measure of the number of nodes in the RRBB enumeration tree, and provide computational evidence that the size of the RRBB tree is proportional to this distance. Since we cannot know the distance to integrality a priori, we prove that the norm of the Moore–Penrose generalized inverse of the matrix of coefficients is a key factor for bounding this distance, and then we propose a preconditioning method to reduce this norm using lattice reduction techniques. We also propose a set of valid box constraints that help accelerate the RRBB method. Our computational results show that the proposed preconditioning significantly reduces the size of the RRBB enumeration tree, that the preconditioning combined with the proposed set of box constraints can significantly reduce the computational time of RRBB, and that the resulting RRBB method can outperform the Schnorr and Eucher method, a widely used method for solving integer least squares problems, on some types of problem data. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel Anjos & Xiao-Wen Chang & Wen-Yang Ku, 2014. "Lattice preconditioning for the real relaxation branch-and-bound approach for integer least squares problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 227-242, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:59:y:2014:i:2:p:227-242
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-014-0148-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10898-014-0148-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10898-014-0148-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sanjay Mehrotra & Zhifeng Li, 2011. "Branching on hyperplane methods for mixed integer linear and convex programming using adjoint lattices," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 623-649, April.
    2. H. W. Lenstra, 1983. "Integer Programming with a Fixed Number of Variables," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 538-548, November.
    3. AARDAL, Karen & WOLSEY, Laurence A., 2010. "Lattice based extended formulations for integer linear equality systems," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2192, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. AARDAL, Karen & WEISMANTEL, Robert & WOLSEY, Laurence, 2002. "Non-standard approaches to integer programming," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1568, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karen Aardal & Frederik von Heymann, 2014. "On the Structure of Reduced Kernel Lattice Bases," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 823-840, August.
    2. Yu Yang & Natashia Boland & Martin Savelsbergh, 2021. "Multivariable Branching: A 0-1 Knapsack Problem Case Study," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1354-1367, October.
    3. Sanjay Mehrotra & Zhifeng Li, 2011. "Branching on hyperplane methods for mixed integer linear and convex programming using adjoint lattices," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 623-649, April.
    4. Kibaek Kim & Sanjay Mehrotra, 2015. "A Two-Stage Stochastic Integer Programming Approach to Integrated Staffing and Scheduling with Application to Nurse Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1431-1451, December.
    5. M. Köppe & M. Queyranne & C. T. Ryan, 2010. "Parametric Integer Programming Algorithm for Bilevel Mixed Integer Programs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 137-150, July.
    6. K. Aardal & R. E. Bixby & C. A. J. Hurkens & A. K. Lenstra & J. W. Smeltink, 2000. "Market Split and Basis Reduction: Towards a Solution of the Cornuéjols-Dawande Instances," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 192-202, August.
    7. Alberto Del Pia & Robert Hildebrand & Robert Weismantel & Kevin Zemmer, 2016. "Minimizing Cubic and Homogeneous Polynomials over Integers in the Plane," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 511-530, May.
    8. Klaus Jansen & Roberto Solis-Oba, 2011. "A Polynomial Time OPT + 1 Algorithm for the Cutting Stock Problem with a Constant Number of Object Lengths," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 743-753, November.
    9. Friedrich Eisenbrand & Gennady Shmonin, 2008. "Parametric Integer Programming in Fixed Dimension," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 839-850, November.
    10. Elizabeth Baldwin & Paul Klemperer, 2019. "Understanding Preferences: “Demand Types”, and the Existence of Equilibrium With Indivisibilities," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 867-932, May.
    11. Masing, Berenike & Lindner, Niels & Borndörfer, Ralf, 2022. "The price of symmetric line plans in the Parametric City," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 419-443.
    12. Sanchari Deb & Kari Tammi & Karuna Kalita & Pinakeswar Mahanta, 2018. "Review of recent trends in charging infrastructure planning for electric vehicles," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(6), November.
    13. Kenneth J. Arrow & Timothy J. Kehoe, 1994. "Distinguished Fellow: Herbert Scarf's Contributions to Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(4), pages 161-181, Fall.
    14. Kubale, Marek, 1996. "Preemptive versus nonpreemptive scheduling of biprocessor tasks on dedicated processors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 242-251, October.
    15. Mohammad Sabbagh & Richard Soland, 2009. "An improved partial enumeration algorithm for integer programming problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 147-161, February.
    16. Matthias Bentert & Robert Bredereck & Péter Györgyi & Andrzej Kaczmarczyk & Rolf Niedermeier, 2023. "A multivariate complexity analysis of the material consumption scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 369-382, August.
    17. Danny Nguyen & Igor Pak, 2020. "The Computational Complexity of Integer Programming with Alternations," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 191-204, February.
    18. William Cook & Thomas Rutherford & Herbert E. Scarf & David F. Shallcross, 1991. "An Implementation of the Generalized Basis Reduction Algorithm for Integer Programming," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 990, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    19. Egor Ianovski, 2022. "Electing a committee with dominance constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(2), pages 985-1000, November.
    20. Sascha Kurz & Nikolas Tautenhahn, 2013. "On Dedekind’s problem for complete simple games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 42(2), pages 411-437, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:59:y:2014:i:2:p:227-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.