IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcsosc/v7y2024i2d10.1007_s42001-024-00283-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aligning agent-based testing (ABT) with the experimental research paradigm: a literature review and best practices

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Schwabl

    (LMU Munich)

  • Mario Haim

    (LMU Munich)

  • Julian Unkel

    (LMU Munich)

Abstract

The study of algorithmically curated media environments through emulated browsing has become a key method of computational social science. Here, we review underlying concepts and typical implementations of these so-called agent-based testing (ABT) studies, particularly those that experimentally vary inputs on search engines, social media, or aggregation platforms, to study subsequent outputs. This review aims to identify, evaluate, and discuss implementations and reporting standards of ABT studies within the experimental research paradigm. First, we discuss general assumptions of the experimental research paradigm and to what extent ABT experiments align with them, finding a considerable overlap with minor deviations. Second, we systematically reviewed 66 ABT studies from the social and information sciences, finding little reference to the experimental research paradigm vis-à-vis large variations in implementation and reporting practices. Third, our findings then inform five best-practice guidelines for future ABT experiments where we suggest to explicitly and much more strictly align those studies with the experimental research paradigm. We argue that ABT experiments would benefit from such an adaptation of already established experimental practices, thereby improving reproducibility and replicability.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Schwabl & Mario Haim & Julian Unkel, 2024. "Aligning agent-based testing (ABT) with the experimental research paradigm: a literature review and best practices," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 1625-1644, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:7:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s42001-024-00283-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s42001-024-00283-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42001-024-00283-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s42001-024-00283-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arendt, Florian & Haim, Mario & Scherr, Sebastian, 2020. "Investigating Google's suicide-prevention efforts in celebrity suicides using agent-based testing: A cross-national study in four European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lythreatis, Sophie & Singh, Sanjay Kumar & El-Kassar, Abdul-Nasser, 2022. "The digital divide: A review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Fahey, Robert A. & Boo, Jeremy & Ueda, Michiko, 2020. "Covariance in diurnal patterns of suicide-related expressions on Twitter and recorded suicide deaths," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    3. Arendt, Florian & Forrai, Michaela & Findl, Oliver, 2020. "Dealing with negative reviews on physician-rating websites: An experimental test of how physicians can prevent reputational damage via effective response strategies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:7:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s42001-024-00283-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.