IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcsosc/v4y2021i2d10.1007_s42001-021-00114-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fake reviews classification using deep learning ensemble of shallow convolutions

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Saad Javed

    (National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences)

  • Hammad Majeed

    (National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences)

  • Hasan Mujtaba

    (National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences)

  • Mirza Omer Beg

    (National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences)

Abstract

Online reviews have a decisive impact on consumers’ purchasing decisions. This opens the doors for spammers and scammers to post fake reviews for promoting non-existent products or undermine competitor products to affect social behavior. Thus, the identification of reviews as fake and real has become ever more important. Traditional approaches for text classification use a bag-of-words model to represent text which causes sparsity and word representations learnt from neural networks with limited ability to handle unknown words. In this paper, we propose a technique based on three different models trained on the idea of a multi-view learning technique and create an ensemble of all models by employing an aggregation technique for generating final predictions. The core idea of our methodology is to extract rich information from the text of reviews by combining bag-of-n-grams and parallel convolution neural networks(CNNs). By using an n-gram embedding layer with small kernel sizes we can use local context with the same computation power as required to train deep and complex CNNs. Our CNN-based architecture consumes n-gram embeddings as input and uses the parallel convolutional blocks to extract richer feature representations from text. Our approach for the detection of fake reviews also combines textual linguistic features and non-textual features related to reviewer behavior. We evaluate our approach on publically available Yelp Filtered Dataset and achieve F1 scores of up to 92% for classifying fake reviews.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Saad Javed & Hammad Majeed & Hasan Mujtaba & Mirza Omer Beg, 2021. "Fake reviews classification using deep learning ensemble of shallow convolutions," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 883-902, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:4:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s42001-021-00114-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s42001-021-00114-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42001-021-00114-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s42001-021-00114-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bilal Naeem & Aymen Khan & Mirza Omer Beg & Hasan Mujtaba, 2020. "A deep learning framework for clickbait detection on social area network using natural language cues," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 231-243, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hajek, Petr & Hikkerova, Lubica & Sahut, Jean-Michel, 2023. "Fake review detection in e-Commerce platforms using aspect-based sentiment analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Birim, Şule Öztürk & Kazancoglu, Ipek & Kumar Mangla, Sachin & Kahraman, Aysun & Kumar, Satish & Kazancoglu, Yigit, 2022. "Detecting fake reviews through topic modelling," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 884-900.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tobias Blanke & Tommaso Venturini, 2022. "A network view on reliability: using machine learning to understand how we assess news websites," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 69-88, May.
    2. Olga Papadopoulou & Evangelia Kartsounidou & Symeon Papadopoulos, 2022. "COVID-Related Misinformation Migration to BitChute and Odysee," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Anna Ruelens, 2022. "Analyzing user-generated content using natural language processing: a case study of public satisfaction with healthcare systems," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 731-749, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:4:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s42001-021-00114-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.