IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v37y2019i2d10.1007_s10878-018-0317-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reoptimization of minimum latency problem revisited: don’t panic when asked to revisit the route after local modifications

Author

Listed:
  • Wenkai Dai

    (Saarland University)

  • Yongjie Yang

    (Saarland University)

Abstract

We study the reoptimization of the Minimum Latency problem (MLP) in metric space with respect to the modifications of adding (resp. removing) a vertex and increasing (resp. decreasing) the cost of an edge $$e^*$$ e ∗ . We provide 7 / 3-approximation and 3-approximation algorithms for the modifications of adding and removing a vertex, respectively. For the modification of increasing the cost of an edge $$e^*$$ e ∗ , we obtain $$\alpha $$ α -approximation algorithms where $$\alpha $$ α changes from 2.1286 to 4 / 3 as $$e^*$$ e ∗ moves from the first edge to the last edge in the given optimal tour of the initial instance. Concerning the case of decreasing the cost of an edge $$e^*$$ e ∗ , if $$e^*$$ e ∗ is an edge of the given optimal tour, we get a 2-approximation algorithm. Moreover, if $$e^*$$ e ∗ is the i-th edge of the given optimal tour and i is a constant, we derive a , but prove that an does not exist unless . We also show that the special case where $$i\in \{1,2\}$$ i ∈ { 1 , 2 } is polynomial-time solvable. If $$e^*$$ e ∗ is not in the given optimal tour, we derive a 2.1286-approximation algorithm, where n is the number of vertices. Finally, we show that if an approximation solution instead of an optimal one is given for the initial instance, the reoptimization of MLP with the vertex deletion operation admits no $$\alpha $$ α -approximation algorithm unless MLP itself admits such an algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenkai Dai & Yongjie Yang, 2019. "Reoptimization of minimum latency problem revisited: don’t panic when asked to revisit the route after local modifications," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 601-619, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:37:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10878-018-0317-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-018-0317-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-018-0317-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-018-0317-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christos H. Papadimitriou & Mihalis Yannakakis, 1993. "The Traveling Salesman Problem with Distances One and Two," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 1-11, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Federico Della Croce, 2016. "MP or not MP: that is the question," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 33-42, February.
    2. Martijn Ee & René Sitters, 2020. "The Chinese deliveryman problem," 4OR, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 341-356, September.
    3. Mnich, Matthias & Mömke, Tobias, 2018. "Improved integrality gap upper bounds for traveling salesperson problems with distances one and two," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(2), pages 436-457.
    4. Ceranoglu, Ahmet N. & Duman, Ekrem, 2013. "VRP12 (vehicle routing problem with distances one and two) with side constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 461-467.
    5. E Duman & M H Ozcelik & A N Ceranoglu, 2005. "A TSP (1,2) application arising in cable assembly shops," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(6), pages 642-648, June.
    6. Zhang, Huili & Tong, Weitian & Xu, Yinfeng & Lin, Guohui, 2015. "The Steiner Traveling Salesman Problem with online edge blockages," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 30-40.
    7. Monnot, Jerome & Paschos, Vangelis Th. & Toulouse, Sophie, 2003. "Differential approximation results for the traveling salesman problem with distances 1 and 2," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(3), pages 557-568, March.
    8. Bogdan Armaselu, 2023. "Approximation algorithms for some extensions of the maximum profit routing problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 1-22, January.
    9. Mathias Weller & Annie Chateau & Rodolphe Giroudeau & Jean-Claude König & Valentin Pollet, 2018. "On residual approximation in solution extension problems," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 1195-1220, November.
    10. Demange, Marc & Paschos, Vangelis Th., 2005. "Polynomial approximation algorithms with performance guarantees: An introduction-by-example," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(3), pages 555-568, September.
    11. Renzo Gómez & Yoshiko Wakabayashi, 2020. "Nontrivial path covers of graphs: existence, minimization and maximization," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 437-456, February.
    12. Miroslav Chlebík & Janka Chlebíková, 2022. "Weighted amplifiers and inapproximability results for Travelling Salesman problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1368-1390, July.
    13. Monnot, Jerome, 2005. "Approximation algorithms for the maximum Hamiltonian path problem with specified endpoint(s)," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(3), pages 721-735, March.
    14. Cristina Bazgan & Arne Herzel & Stefan Ruzika & Clemens Thielen & Daniel Vanderpooten, 2022. "An approximation algorithm for a general class of parametric optimization problems," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1328-1358, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:37:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10878-018-0317-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.