IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jagbes/v26y2021i2d10.1007_s13253-020-00425-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining Environmental Area Frame Surveys of a Finite Population

Author

Listed:
  • Wilmer Prentius

    (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)

  • Xin Zhao

    (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)

  • Anton Grafström

    (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)

Abstract

New ways to combine data from multiple environmental area frame surveys of a finite population are being introduced. Environmental surveys often sample finite populations through area frames. However, to combine multiple surveys without risking bias, design components (inclusion probabilities, etc.) are needed at unit level of the finite population. We show how to derive the design components and exemplify this for three commonly used area frame sampling designs. We show how to produce an unbiased estimator using data from multiple surveys, and how to reduce the risk of introducing significant bias in linear combinations of estimators from multiple surveys. If separate estimators and variance estimators are used in linear combinations, there’s a risk of introducing negative bias. By using pooled variance estimators, the bias of a linear combination estimator can be reduced. National environmental surveys often provide good estimators at national level, while being too sparse to provide sufficiently good estimators for some domains. With the proposed methods, one can plan extra sampling efforts for such domains, without discarding readily available information from the aggregate/national survey. Through simulation, we show that the proposed methods are either unbiased, or yield low variance with small bias, compared to traditionally used methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilmer Prentius & Xin Zhao & Anton Grafström, 2021. "Combining Environmental Area Frame Surveys of a Finite Population," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(2), pages 250-266, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:26:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s13253-020-00425-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s13253-020-00425-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13253-020-00425-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13253-020-00425-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberto Benedetti & Federica Piersimoni & Paolo Postiglione, 2015. "Sampling Spatial Units for Agricultural Surveys," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-662-46008-5, Fall.
    2. Lohr, Sharon & Rao, J.N.K., 2006. "Estimation in Multiple-Frame Surveys," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1019-1030, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephanie Coffey, PhD. & Jaya Damineni & John Eltinge, PhD. & Anup Mathur, PhD. & Kayla Varela & Allison Zotti, 2023. "Some Open Questions on Multiple-Source Extensions of Adaptive-Survey Design Concepts and Methods," Working Papers 23-03, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    2. Xin Zhao & Anton Grafström, 2020. "A sample coordination method to monitor totals of environmental variables," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(6), September.
    3. Linda Altieri & Daniela Cocchi, 2021. "Spatial Sampling for Non‐compact Patterns," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(3), pages 532-549, December.
    4. Antonio Arcos & María del Mar Rueda & Manuel Trujillo & David Molina, 2015. "Review of Estimation Methods for Landline and Cell Phone Surveys," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 44(3), pages 458-485, August.
    5. James M. Lepkowski & Mahmoud A. Elkasabi & Steven G. Heeringa, 2015. "Joint Calibration Estimator for dual frame surveys," Statistics in Transition new series, Główny Urząd Statystyczny (Polska), vol. 16(1), pages 7-36, May.
    6. I. Sánchez-Borrego & A. Arcos & M. Rueda, 2019. "Kernel-based methods for combining information of several frame surveys," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 71-86, January.
    7. Elkasabi Mahmoud A. & Heeringa Steven G. & Lepkowski James M., 2015. "Joint Calibration Estimator for Dual Frame Surveys," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 16(1), pages 7-36, March.
    8. Linda J. Young & Michael Jacobsen, 2022. "Sample Design and Estimation When Using a Web-Scraped List Frame and Capture-Recapture Methods," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(2), pages 261-279, June.
    9. Guillaume Chauvet & Ronan Le Gleut, 2021. "Inference under pivotal sampling: Properties, variance estimation, and application to tesselation for spatial sampling," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(1), pages 108-131, March.
    10. Giuseppe Espa & Diego Giuliani & Flavio Santi & Emanuele Taufer, 2017. "Model-based variance estimation in two-dimensional systematic sampling," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 75(3), pages 265-275, December.
    11. Giancarlo Manzi & David J. Spiegelhalter & Rebecca M. Turner & Julian Flowers & Simon G. Thompson, 2011. "Modelling bias in combining small area prevalence estimates from multiple surveys," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 174(1), pages 31-50, January.
    12. Wilmer Prentius, 2024. "Locally correlated Poisson sampling," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), March.
    13. Guillaume Chauvet, 2016. "Variance estimation for the 2006 French housing survey," Mathematical Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 147-163, July.
    14. Letícia Ellen Dal Canton & Luciana Pagliosa Carvalho Guedes & Miguel Angel Uribe-Opazo, 2021. "Reduction of Sample Size in the Soil Physical-Chemical Attributes Using the Multivariate Effective Sample Size," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 357-376, June.
    15. Sang Hailin & Lopiano Kenneth K. & Abreu Denise A. & Lamas Andrea C. & Young Linda J. & Arroway Pam, 2017. "Adjusting for Misclassification: A Three-Phase Sampling Approach," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 33(1), pages 207-222, March.
    16. C. Ferraz & F. Mecatti & J. Torres, 2023. "Dual frame design in agricultural surveys: reviewing roots and methodological perspectives," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(2), pages 593-617, June.
    17. Xu Xu & Peter Z. G. Qian & Qing Liu, 2016. "Samurai Sudoku-Based Space-Filling Designs for Data Pooling," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(1), pages 1-8, February.
    18. Maria Mar Rueda & Maria Giovanna Ranalli & Antonio Arcos & David Molina, 2021. "Population empirical likelihood estimation in dual frame surveys," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(5), pages 2473-2490, October.
    19. Mahmoud A. Elkasabi & Steven G. Heeringa & James M. Lepkowski, 2015. "Joint Calibration Estimator For Dual Frame Surveys," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 16(1), pages 7-36, March.
    20. R. Benedetti & F. Piersimoni & P. Postiglione, 2017. "Alternative and complementary approaches to spatially balanced samples," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 75(3), pages 249-264, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:26:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s13253-020-00425-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.