IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jagbes/v21y2016i2d10.1007_s13253-015-0243-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Species Proportions to Quantify Turnover in Biodiversity

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan Yuan

    (University of St Andrews)

  • Stephen T. Buckland

    (University of St Andrews)

  • Phil J. Harrison

    (ArtDatabanken)

  • Sergey Foss

    (Heriot-Watt University)

  • Alison Johnston

    (British Trust for Ornithology)

Abstract

Quantifying species turnover is an important aspect of biodiversity monitoring. Turnover measures are usually based on species presence/absence data, reflecting the rate at which species are replaced. However, measures that reflect the rate at which individuals of a species are replaced by individuals of another species are far more sensitive to change. In this paper, we propose families of turnover measures that reflect changes in species proportions. We study the properties of our measures, and use simulation to assess their success in detecting turnover. Using data on the British farmland bird community from the breeding bird survey, we evaluate our measures to quantify temporal turnover and how it varies across the British mainland.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan Yuan & Stephen T. Buckland & Phil J. Harrison & Sergey Foss & Alison Johnston, 2016. "Using Species Proportions to Quantify Turnover in Biodiversity," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(2), pages 363-381, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:21:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s13253-015-0243-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s13253-015-0243-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13253-015-0243-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13253-015-0243-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne Chao & Robin L. Chazdon & Robert K. Colwell & Tsung-Jen Shen, 2006. "Abundance-Based Similarity Indices and Their Estimation When There Are Unseen Species in Samples," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 361-371, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. S. T. Buckland & Y. Yuan & E. Marcon, 2017. "Measuring temporal trends in biodiversity," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 101(4), pages 461-474, October.
    2. Boit, Alice & Spencer, Matthew, 2019. "Equivalence and dissimilarity of ecosystem states," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 396(C), pages 12-22.
    3. Ricotta, Carlo & Pavoine, Sandrine, 2022. "A new parametric measure of functional dissimilarity: Bridging the gap between the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and the Euclidean distance," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sokichi Shiro & Ryu Makihara & Masahiro Yamaguchi & Masayuki Kadowaki & Yuichi Saeki, 2023. "Compatibility of adzuki bean (Vigna angularis) and Bradyrhizobium USDA strains, and geographical distribution and community structure on indigenous adzuki bean-nodulating bradyrhizobia in Japan," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(3), pages 217-232.
    2. Tovo, Anna & Favretti, Marco, 2018. "The distance decay of similarity in tropical rainforests. A spatial point processes analytical formulation," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 78-89.
    3. Stefania Paduano & Isabella Marchesi & Maria Elisabetta Casali & Federica Valeriani & Giuseppina Frezza & Elena Vecchi & Luca Sircana & Vincenzo Romano Spica & Paola Borella & Annalisa Bargellini, 2020. "Characterisation of Microbial Community Associated with Different Disinfection Treatments in Hospital hot Water Networks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Anne Chao & Lou Jost & S. C. Chiang & Y.-H. Jiang & Robin L. Chazdon, 2008. "A Two-Stage Probabilistic Approach to Multiple-Community Similarity Indices," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1178-1186, December.
    5. Klaich, M. Javier & Kinas, Paul G. & Pedraza, Susana N. & Coscarella, Mariano A. & Crespo, Enrique A., 2011. "Estimating dyad association probability under imperfect and heterogeneous detection," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(15), pages 2642-2650.
    6. Chang Xuan Mao & Jun Li, 2009. "Comparing Species Assemblages Via Species Accumulation Curves," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 1063-1067, December.
    7. Luca Battisti & Lauranne Pille & Thomas Wachtel & Federica Larcher & Ina Säumel, 2019. "Residential Greenery: State of the Art and Health-Related Ecosystem Services and Disservices in the City of Berlin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Cazzolla Gatti, Roberto & Amoroso, Nicola & Monaco, Alfonso, 2020. "Estimating and comparing biodiversity with a single universal metric," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 424(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:21:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s13253-015-0243-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.