IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/inrvec/v73y2026i2d10.1007_s12232-026-00544-y.html

From tax state to protection market: fortifications, coercion radius, and the spatial reorganization of power in post-Roman Europe, c. 400–900

Author

Listed:
  • Mingshu Wang

    (Independent Researcher)

Abstract

The end of Roman rule in the West reorganized the spatial foundations of political economy. The late Roman Empire sustained power through a tax state that joined land assessment, coercive enforcement, military provisioning, judicial authority, and long-distance logistics within a relatively continuous geography of rule. Western contraction did not erase Roman forms: law, cities, episcopal authority, offices, titles, fiscal memory, and imperial prestige remained usable. They no longer worked at the same distance. Between the fifth and ninth centuries, authority had to be made credible from defended places: fortified cities, hillforts, monasteries, bridgeheads, castra, estate complexes, and burhs. We describe the surrounding zone of effective command as a coercion radius: the area within which a fortified node could enforce judgment, compel labor, tax movement, organize defense, and threaten force. Within those radii, rulers, bishops, monasteries, urban elites, and landed magnates exchanged protection for rents, tolls, service, labor, repair duties, transport, and obedience. That exchange formed a protection market whose structure linked military geography to emerging territorial rule. Drawing on late Roman law, Cassiodorus, Procopius, Gregory of Tours, Visigothic law and councils, Frankish capitularies, the Burghal Hidage, and scholarship on continuity, rupture, and regional transformation, we recast the passage from empire to successor polities as a reorganization of reach. Fortifications did not cause a new order by themselves. They made inherited and emerging forms of command defensible, repeatable, and locally credible after the Roman tax state lost western depth.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingshu Wang, 2026. "From tax state to protection market: fortifications, coercion radius, and the spatial reorganization of power in post-Roman Europe, c. 400–900," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 73(2), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:inrvec:v:73:y:2026:i:2:d:10.1007_s12232-026-00544-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s12232-026-00544-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12232-026-00544-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12232-026-00544-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • N23 - Economic History - - Financial Markets and Institutions - - - Europe: Pre-1913
    • N43 - Economic History - - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation - - - Europe: Pre-1913
    • N93 - Economic History - - Regional and Urban History - - - Europe: Pre-1913
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State
    • R12 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; Interregional Trade (economic geography)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:inrvec:v:73:y:2026:i:2:d:10.1007_s12232-026-00544-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.