IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v12y2010i4d10.1007_s10796-009-9164-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Specification and verification of harmonized business-process collaborations

Author

Listed:
  • Alex Norta

    (University of Helsinki)

  • Rik Eshuis

    (Eindhoven University of Technology)

Abstract

In the area of business-to-business (B2B) collaboration, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) are confronted with the problem of spending a considerable time and effort on coordinating suppliers across multiple tiers of their supply chains. By supporting inter-organizational business-process collaborations with service-oriented technology, a scope for more efficient and effective supply-chain coordination is anticipated. This paper defines a formal framework, called eSourcing, for specifying structurally harmonized inter-organizational business-process collaborations. The framework permits verification of harmonized processes before their enactment. Moreover, the framework uses private and public layers to protect competitive knowledge of the individual partners. In the research project CrossWork, the eSourcing framework has been integral for harmonizing on an external level the intra-organizational business processes of a service-consuming and one or many service-providing organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex Norta & Rik Eshuis, 2010. "Specification and verification of harmonized business-process collaborations," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 457-479, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:12:y:2010:i:4:d:10.1007_s10796-009-9164-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-009-9164-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-009-9164-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-009-9164-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. M. P. van der Aalst & Akhil Kumar, 2003. "XML–Based Schema Definition for Support of Interorganizational Workflow," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 23-46, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heidi Romero & Remco Dijkman & Paul Grefen & Arjan Weele, 2015. "Factors that Determine the Extent of Business Process Standardization and the Subsequent Effect on Business Performance," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 57(4), pages 261-270, August.
    2. Naeem Khalid Janjua & Farookh Khadeer Hussain & Omar Khadeer Hussain, 2013. "Semantic information and knowledge integration through argumentative reasoning to support intelligent decision making," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 167-192, April.
    3. Chulhwan Chris Bang, 2015. "Information systems frontiers: Keyword analysis and classification," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 217-237, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roman Beck & Sven Weber & Robert Wayne Gregory, 2013. "Theory-generating design science research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 637-651, September.
    2. Johny Ghattas & Pnina Soffer, 2009. "Evaluation of inter-organizational business process solutions: A conceptual model-based approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 273-291, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:12:y:2010:i:4:d:10.1007_s10796-009-9164-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.