IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujoag/v14y2017i4d10.1007_s10433-017-0417-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validity of the de Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale in Spanish older population: competitive structural models and item response theory

Author

Listed:
  • Jose M. Tomás

    (Universitat de Valencia)

  • Sacramento Pinazo-Hernandis

    (Universitat de Valencia)

  • Mónica Donio-Bellegarde

    (Universitat de Valencia)

  • Pedro M. Hontangas

    (Universitat de Valencia)

Abstract

Loneliness is a subjective measure of one’s state of mind and the negative feelings about one’s level of social contact, which usually involves an unwanted discrepancy between existing and desired relationships. It is measured through self-reported questionnaires, among which a widely used one is the de Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (DJGLS). Although it has been previously tested and proven to be a reliable tool for measuring loneliness of Spanish older people, some relevant research questions remain unsolved. Therefore, this article aims to present a validity study of the Spanish version of the DJGLS for its use with older people, by establishing its factorial validity; studying the adequateness of a Rasch model underlying participants’ responses; offering evidence of its reliability; and testing for convergent and discriminant validity. Data were obtained in a survey conducted with older adults attending Lifelong Learning programs in Valencia (Spain). The sample consisted of 335 people aged 55 years or older. Sociodemographic data were collected, and loneliness was measured with the DJGLS and the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Results have supported a unidimensional substantive structure, but with minor method effects associated with negatively worded items. In terms of multidimensional IRT analysis, the 2 Parameters Logistic Model fitted the data well and offered better information functions than the Rasch model. Reliability and criterion-related validity estimates were adequate.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose M. Tomás & Sacramento Pinazo-Hernandis & Mónica Donio-Bellegarde & Pedro M. Hontangas, 2017. "Validity of the de Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale in Spanish older population: competitive structural models and item response theory," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 429-437, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujoag:v:14:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10433-017-0417-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10433-017-0417-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10433-017-0417-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10433-017-0417-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margaret Penning & Guiping Liu & Pak Chou, 2014. "Measuring Loneliness Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: The UCLA and de Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scales," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 1147-1166, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sara Marsillas & Eric Schoenmakers, 2022. "Older adults’ mentioned practices for coping with loneliness," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 753-762, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. André Hajek & Benedikt Kretzler & Hans-Helmut König, 2020. "Multimorbidity, Loneliness, and Social Isolation. A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Hiromi Taniguchi & Gayle Kaufman, 2022. "Family, Collectivism, and Loneliness from a Cross-Country Perspective," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(3), pages 1555-1581, June.
    3. Mary Ann Jarvis & Anita Padmanabhanunni & Jennifer Chipps, 2019. "An Evaluation of a Low-Intensity Cognitive Behavioral Therapy mHealth-Supported Intervention to Reduce Loneliness in Older People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, April.
    4. d'Hombres, Beatrice & Barjaková, Martina & Schnepf, Sylke V., 2021. "Loneliness and Social Isolation: An Unequally Shared Burden in Europe," IZA Discussion Papers 14245, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Md. Sazedur Rahman & Md. Ashfikur Rahman & Md. Saidur Rahman, 2019. "Prevalence and Determinants of Loneliness among Older Adults in Bangladesh," International Journal of Emerging Trends in Social Sciences, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 5(2), pages 57-64.
    6. Thijs van den Broek & Marco Tosi, 2020. "The More the Merrier? The Causal Effect of High Fertility on Later-Life Loneliness in Eastern Europe," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 733-748, June.
    7. André Hajek & Hans-Helmut König, 2022. "Climate Anxiety, Loneliness and Perceived Social Isolation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-11, November.
    8. Soumi Muhuri & Sanghamitra Basu, 2018. "Developing Residential Social Cohesion Index for High-Rise Group Housing Complexes in India," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 923-947, June.
    9. Urszula Tymoszuk & Neta Spiro & Rosie Perkins & Adele Mason-Bertrand & Kate Gee & Aaron Williamon, 2021. "Arts engagement trends in the United Kingdom and their mental and social wellbeing implications: HEartS Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-35, March.
    10. Marlies Maes & Pamela Qualter & Gerine M. A. Lodder & Marcus Mund, 2022. "How (Not) to Measure Loneliness: A Review of the Eight Most Commonly Used Scales," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-37, August.
    11. Pagan, Ricardo & Malo, Miguel, 2021. "Dynamic analysis of loneliness and disability at older ages in Europe by gender," MPRA Paper 110616, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujoag:v:14:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10433-017-0417-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.