IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v26y2025i8d10.1007_s10198-025-01778-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic review of minimum important changes for generic multi-attribute utility instruments and recommendations for their estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Glen J. Henson

    (Menzies Institute for Medical Research (University of Tasmania))

  • Ingrid Mei

    (Menzies Institute for Medical Research (University of Tasmania))

  • Bruce V. Taylor

    (Menzies Institute for Medical Research (University of Tasmania))

  • Paul Scuffham

    (Menzies Health Institute Queensland (Griffith University))

  • Gang Chen

    (University of Melbourne)

  • Julie A. Campbell

    (Menzies Institute for Medical Research (University of Tasmania))

Abstract

Introduction Minimum important changes (MICs) represent thresholds for clinically meaningful change. Multi-attribute utility instruments (MAUIs) generate health state utilities (holistic measures of health-related quality of life). No systematic review of MICs specifically for MAUIs has been conducted. In addition, no guidelines for estimating MICs for MAUIs have been proposed. We aimed to correct these evidence gaps by producing guidelines contextualised by a systematic review. Methods We searched ten databases for relevant records using various search terms. Extracted data were analysed narratively and descriptively. The presence of key reporting items (relating to precision, sensitivity, and concurrent validity) was also evaluated. Guidelines for MIC estimation were informed by the broader MIC literature and contextualised using study results. Results The review identified 5035 non-duplicate records, with 68 entering the study. 282 unique, anchor-based MICs were extracted. Of these MICs, 119 (42.20%) pertained to the EQ-5D-3L, 82 (29.08%) to the EQ-5D-5L, and 50 (17.73%) to the SF-6D.v1. The most common anchor-based method used to estimate MICs (107, 37.94%) involved taking the mean change score for a group considered to have experienced a MIC. Distribution-based methods were also common, appearing in 31 (45.59%) of the included studies. The inclusion of key reporting items was generally deficient. Conclusions Deficiencies in reporting and diverse estimation methods raise concerns regarding the extant MAUI MIC literature. Researchers should exercise caution when using existing MAUI MICs. Recommendations presented in our study may assist researchers in effectively estimating MICs for use in health economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Glen J. Henson & Ingrid Mei & Bruce V. Taylor & Paul Scuffham & Gang Chen & Julie A. Campbell, 2025. "A systematic review of minimum important changes for generic multi-attribute utility instruments and recommendations for their estimation," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 26(8), pages 1383-1399, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:26:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s10198-025-01778-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-025-01778-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-025-01778-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-025-01778-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C69 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Other
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:26:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s10198-025-01778-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.