IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/epolit/v41y2024i1d10.1007_s40888-024-00331-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political economy revisited: structures and objectives at the systemic level

Author

Listed:
  • Ivano Cardinale

    (Goldsmiths, University of London
    Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei)

  • Roberto Scazzieri

    (Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna
    Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei)

Abstract

Political economy developed from profound transformations in economic and political life. The economic sphere extended from the management of individual units, such as households or the royal demesne, to a system defined as the collection of economic activities subject to sovereign authority, and characterized by widening webs of productive and social interdependencies across manifold units. In the political sphere, sovereign decisions came to be considered in the light of the material opportunities and constraints associated with productive interdependencies. Accordingly, the principle of economic life moved from the allocation principles of the household to system-level decision-making, guided by the correspondence between means and polity-level objectives and understood in the light of the material and social interdependences in the polity. The paper maintains that the relationship between economic structures and objectives at the systemic level should become again a central object of political economy. It goes on to argue that the development of structural economic analysis since the 20th century provides powerful analytical tools to investigate: (i) the systemic objectives that polities could pursue given their economic structure; (ii) the social aggregates that could form out of those which economic structure makes possible, and the particular objectives they could construe and pursue; and (iii) the constraints that economic structure imposes on the pursuit of all objectives, be they systemic or particular.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivano Cardinale & Roberto Scazzieri, 2024. "Political economy revisited: structures and objectives at the systemic level," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 41(1), pages 153-171, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:epolit:v:41:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s40888-024-00331-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s40888-024-00331-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40888-024-00331-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40888-024-00331-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baranzini, Mauro, 1991. "A Theory of Wealth Distribution and Accumulation," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198233138, Decembrie.
    2. Andr? Tiran, 2017. "Antoine de Monchrestien and Antonio Serra: Two founders of political economy," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1), pages 89-100.
    3. Steenge, Albert E. & van den Berg, Richard, 2007. "Transcribing the Tableau Économique: Input-Output Analysis à la Quesnay," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(3), pages 331-358, September.
    4. Amiya Kumar Bagchi, 2014. "Contextual political economy, not Whig economics," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 38(3), pages 545-562.
    5. Cosimo Perrotta, 2016. "Montchr?tien Founder of Political Economy," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 73-84.
    6. Cardinale, Ivano & Landesmann, Michael, 2022. "Generalising the political economy of structural change: A Structural Political Economy approach," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 546-558.
    7. Dotan Leshem, 2016. "Retrospectives: What Did the Ancient Greeks Mean by Oikonomia?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(1), pages 225-238, Winter.
    8. Bertram Schefold, 2016. "Political Economy in the Pseudo-Aristotelian Oeconomica II and the German Cameralist Klock," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 59-72.
    9. Cardinale, Ivano, 2018. "A bridge over troubled water: A Structural Political Economy of vertical integration," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 172-179.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cardinale, Ivano, 2024. "Collective objectives, particular objectives, and structural conditions: On Pasinetti's natural economic system and the “institutional problem”," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 202-210.
    2. Baranzini, Mauro L. & Mirante, Amalia, 2021. "Pasinetti's theorem: A narrow escape, for what was to become an inexhaustible research programme," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 470-481.
    3. Cardinale, Ivano, 2022. "On means and ends in structural economic analysis: Broadening the field of enquiry," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 450-457.
    4. Cappelli, Federica & Di Bucchianico, Stefano, 2024. "What role for profits and luxury consumption in the ecological transition?," IPE Working Papers 245/2024, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    5. Steenge, Albert E. & Incera, André Carrascal & Serrano, Mònica, 2020. "Income distributions in multi-sector analysis; Miyazawa’s fundamental equation of income formation revisited," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 377-387.
    6. Kazuhiro Kurose, 2022. "A two-class economy from the multi-sectoral perspective: the controversy between Pasinetti and Meade–Hahn–Samuelson–Modigliani revisited," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 239-270, April.
    7. Milan Zafirovski, 2022. "Some dilemmas of economic democracy: Indicators and empirical analysis," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(1), pages 252-302, February.
    8. S B Caldwell & G P Clarke & L A Keister, 1998. "Modelling Regional Changes in US Household Income and Wealth: A Research Agenda," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 16(6), pages 707-722, December.
    9. Mattauch, Linus & Klenert, David & Stiglitz, Joseph E. & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2017. "Piketty meets Pasinetti: On public investment and intelligent machinery," VfS Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking 168156, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    10. Wolfgang Onyeali & Michael P. Schlaile & Bastian Winkler, 2023. "Navigating the Biocosmos: Cornerstones of a Bioeconomic Utopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, June.
    11. Luigi L. Pasinetti, 2000. "Critique of the neoclassical theory of growth and distribution," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 53(215), pages 383-431.
    12. Luigi L. Pasinetti, 2000. "Critique of the neoclassical theory of growth and distribution," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 53(215), pages 383-431.
    13. Didier Blanchet, 1992. "Retraites et croissance à long terme. Un essai de simulation," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 105(4), pages 1-16.
    14. Lorenzo Cresti & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2023. "Weak sectors and weak ties? Labour dependence and asymmetric positioning in GVCs," LEM Papers Series 2023/10, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    15. Usamah Uthman, 2006. "Profit-sharing versus interest-taking in the Kaldor-Pasinetti theory of income and profit distribution," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 209-222.
    16. Hiroyasu Uemura, 2023. "Theoretical foundations of the international interdependence of growth regimes: price system, income–demand linkage, and quantity adjustment," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 425-455, September.
    17. Mauro Baranzini, 2005. "Modigliani's life-cycle theory of savings fifty years later," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 58(233-234), pages 109-172.
    18. Rodolphe Santos Ferreira & Ragip Ege, 2022. "The net product in the Formule du Tableau Economique: Lessons from a formalism," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 21(3), pages 383-399, September.
    19. Bertram Schefold, 2020. "L'importanza della teoria economica per il benessere e la crescita economica (The importance of economic theory for economic growth and wellbeing)," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 73(290), pages 155-179.
    20. Di Tommaso, Marco R. & Prodi, Elena & Di Matteo, Dante & Mariotti, Ilaria, 2022. "Local public spending, electoral consensus, and sustainable structural change," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 435-453.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:epolit:v:41:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s40888-024-00331-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.