IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i6d10.1007_s10668-023-03226-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The significance and benefits of green infrastructures using I-Tree canopy software with a sustainable approach

Author

Listed:
  • Zahra Ghorbankhani

    (Imam Khomeini International University)

  • Mohamad Mahdi Zarrabi

    (Imam Khomeini International University)

  • Melika Ghorbankhani

    (Shahid-Beheshti of Medical Sciences
    Cardiff Metropolitan University)

Abstract

Nowadays, the ecosystem and ecological values of green infrastructures in forests and urban parks have gained broader attention, because plants are providing not only ecosystem services (ESs) but also social, economic, cultural, educational and health services. Since there have not been proper tools for measuring and evaluating the green infrastructures, urban residents especially those who live in industrial and developing cities have neglected the benefits of the green infrastructures. This research with using I-Tree canopy tool (version 7.1) has considered not only the green infrastructures in two urban sites Nahjol-Balaghe and Pardisan parks (approximately 321 hectares) located in Tehran metropolis, but also ESs and economic savings, which will be contributed to air pollution reduction, carbon storage and sequestration, management and reduction of surface runoff. In addition, this study with applying library and survey methods (interviews with, managers, constructors and visitors) inspects the importance of the sites in sustainable development (economic growth, social and cultural factors and environmental protection), energy conservation (contrasting with urban heat effects, briefly), various plant species and dominant species in the study sites. The result show that 94.58 ha of the site is covered with soil and bare grounds, while only 69.08 ha of it is covered with trees/shrubs, therefore this feature has caused surveyed sites have a poor performance in flood control and mitigation of surface runoff. Consequently, this study also consists of management and solutions for using trees, shrubs and other green infrastructures to cover bare grounds, so as to by measuring the extent of green infrastructures and calculating their economic value in providing ESs, having a healthy urban green space in industrial and large cities, as well as sustainable development management, will help people's well-being, and simultaneously protecting the strategies of green infrastructures in metropolises with ecological and environmental challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Zahra Ghorbankhani & Mohamad Mahdi Zarrabi & Melika Ghorbankhani, 2024. "The significance and benefits of green infrastructures using I-Tree canopy software with a sustainable approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 14893-14913, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03226-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03226-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-03226-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-03226-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viniece Jennings & Colleen E. Reid & Christina H. Fuller, 2021. "Green infrastructure can limit but not solve air pollution injustice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-4, December.
    2. Arerut Yarnvudhi & Nisa Leksungnoen & Pantana Tor-Ngern & Aerwadee Premashthira & Sathid Thinkampheang & Sutheera Hermhuk, 2021. "Evaluation of Regulating and Provisioning Services Provided by a Park Designed to Be Resilient to Climate Change in Bangkok, Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Heris, Mehdi & Bagstad, Kenneth J. & Rhodes, Charles & Troy, Austin & Middel, Ariane & Hopkins, Krissy G. & Matuszak, John, 2021. "Piloting urban ecosystem accounting for the United States," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    4. Yuxin Fan & Fang Wei, 2022. "Contributions of Natural Carbon Sink Capacity and Carbon Neutrality in the Context of Net-Zero Carbon Cities: A Case Study of Hangzhou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Luca Rossi & Maria Elena Menconi & David Grohmann & Antonio Brunori & David J. Nowak, 2022. "Urban Planning Insights from Tree Inventories and Their Regulating Ecosystem Services Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Alessio Russo & Wing Tung Chan & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2021. "Estimating Air Pollution Removal and Monetary Value for Urban Green Infrastructure Strategies Using Web-Based Applications," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Elie Hanna & Francisco A. Comín, 2021. "Urban Green Infrastructure and Sustainable Development: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Marco Cruz-Sandoval & María Isabel Ortego & Elisabet Roca, 2020. "Tree Ecosystem Services, for Everyone? A Compositional Analysis Approach to Assess the Distribution of Urban Trees as an Indicator of Environmental Justice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Francesca Vignoli & Claudia de Luca & Simona Tondelli, 2021. "A Spatial Ecosystem Services Assessment to Support Decision and Policy Making: The Case of the City of Bologna," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Merve Ersoy Mirici, 2022. "The Ecosystem Services and Green Infrastructure: A Systematic Review and the Gap of Economic Valuation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Kelly A. Stevens & Thomas A. Bryer & Haofei Yu, 2021. "Air Quality Enhancement Districts: democratizing data to improve respiratory health," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(4), pages 702-707, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Susan C. Cook-Patton & C. Ronnie Drever & Bronson W. Griscom & Kelley Hamrick & Hamilton Hardman & Timm Kroeger & Pablo Pacheco & Shyla Raghav & Martha Stevenson & Chris Webb & Samantha Yeo & Peter W., 2021. "Protect, manage and then restore lands for climate mitigation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(12), pages 1027-1034, December.
    2. Guangxi Shen & Zipeng Song & Jiacong Xu & Lishuang Zou & Lijin Huang & Yingnan Li, 2023. "Are Ecosystem Services Provided by Street Trees at Parcel Level Worthy of Attention? A Case Study of a Campus in Zhenjiang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Kinga Kimic & Albert Fekete, 2022. "The Ratio of Biologically Vital Areas as a Measure of the Sustainability of Urban Parks Using the Example of Budapest, Hungary," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Guglielmo Pristeri & Viviana di Martino & Silvia Ronchi & Stefano Salata & Francesca Mazza & Andrea Benedini & Andrea Arcidiacono, 2023. "An Operational Model to Downscale Regional Green Infrastructures in Supra-Local Plans: A Case Study in an Italian Alpine Sub-Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-25, July.
    5. Alessio Russo & Wing Tung Chan & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2021. "Estimating Air Pollution Removal and Monetary Value for Urban Green Infrastructure Strategies Using Web-Based Applications," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Alessio Russo & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2021. "Urban Ecosystem Services: Current Knowledge, Gaps, and Future Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-4, August.
    7. Wei Shi & Fuwei Qiao & Liang Zhou, 2021. "Identification of Ecological Risk Zoning on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau from the Perspective of Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Marco Cruz-Sandoval & Elisabet Roca & María Isabel Ortego, 2020. "Compositional Data Analysis Approach in the Measurement of Social-Spatial Segregation: Towards a Sustainable and Inclusive City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Jisong Kim & Jinhee Lee & Timothy J. Lee, 2021. "The Sustainable Success and Growth of Social Ventures: Their Internal and External Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Md Sarwar Hossain & Sayantani M. Basak & Md Nurul Amin & Carl C. Anderson & Emilie Cremin & Fabrice G. Renaud, 2024. "Social‐ecological systems approach for adaptation to climate change," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2766-2778, June.
    11. Costadone, Laura & Lai, Tin-Yu & Hurskainen, Pekka & Kopperoinen, Leena, 2024. "Co-creating urban ecosystem accounting: Physical and monetary accounts of runoff retention service provided by urban green spaces," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    12. Joe F. Bozeman & Shauhrat S. Chopra & Philip James & Sajjad Muhammad & Hua Cai & Kangkang Tong & Maya Carrasquillo & Harold Rickenbacker & Destenie Nock & Weslynne Ashton & Oliver Heidrich & Sybil Der, 2023. "Three research priorities for just and sustainable urban systems: Now is the time to refocus," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(2), pages 382-394, April.
    13. Julia Nerantzia Tzortzi & Laura Guaita & Aspassia Kouzoupi, 2022. "Sustainable Strategies for Urban and Landscape Regeneration Related to Agri-Cultural Heritage in the Urban-Periphery of South Milan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, May.
    14. Alessio Russo, 2024. "Renaturing for Urban Wellbeing: A Socioecological Perspective on Green Space Quality, Accessibility, and Inclusivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-16, July.
    15. Pourya Torkfar & Alessio Russo, 2023. "Assessing the Benefits of Climate-Sensitive Design with Nature-Based Solutions for Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Regeneration: A Case Study in Cheltenham, UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Grover, Isobella & O'Reilly-Wapstra, Julianne & Suitor, Shaun & Hatton MacDonald, Darla, 2023. "Not seeing the accounts for the forest: A systematic literature review of ecosystem accounting for forest resource management purposes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    17. Xiaofeng Ji & Haotian Guan & Mengyuan Lu & Fang Chen & Wenwen Qin, 2022. "International Research Progress in School Travel and Behavior: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-25, July.
    18. Audryana Nay & Peter H. Kahn & Joshua J. Lawler & Gregory N. Bratman, 2022. "Inequitable Changes to Time Spent in Urban Nature during COVID-19: A Case Study of Seattle, WA with Asian, Black, Latino, and White Residents," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
    19. Bagstad, Kenneth J. & Ingram, Jane Carter & Shapiro, Carl D. & La Notte, Alessandra & Maes, Joachim & Vallecillo, Sara & Casey, C. Frank & Glynn, Pierre D. & Heris, Mehdi P. & Johnson, Justin A. & Lau, 2021. "Lessons learned from development of natural capital accounts in the United States and European Union," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    20. Haque, Md. Nazmul & Sharifi, Ayyoob, 2024. "Who are marginalized in accessing urban ecosystem services? A systematic literature review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03226-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.