IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v39y2024i3d10.1007_s00180-023-01351-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discriminating between log-normal and log-logistic distributions in the presence of type-II censoring

Author

Listed:
  • Bishal Diyali

    (Central University of Haryana)

  • Devendra Kumar

    (Central University of Haryana)

  • Sukhdev Singh

    (Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology)

Abstract

The log-normal and the log-logistic distributions are two of the most commonly used distributions for studying positively skewed lifetime data. Both the distributions share number of interesting properties, and for a certain range of parameters their cumulative and hazard functions can also be similar in nature. However, selecting a more appropriate distribution and discriminating among them for a given data to best fit is an important issue. Further, when the data are observed in the presence of some censoring scheme the problem becomes more challenging. In this paper, we address the problem of selecting a more appropriate distribution by discriminating based on the random samples drawn in the presence of type-II censoring. We consider the difference of the maximized log-likelihood functions, and compute the asymptotic distribution of the discrimination statistic. We further propose a modified discriminating approach, and compute the probabilities of correct selection to check the performance of the discrimination procedure. Finally, simulation study is conducted, and two real data sets are analysed for the illustration purpose.

Suggested Citation

  • Bishal Diyali & Devendra Kumar & Sukhdev Singh, 2024. "Discriminating between log-normal and log-logistic distributions in the presence of type-II censoring," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 1459-1483, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:39:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s00180-023-01351-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-023-01351-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-023-01351-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-023-01351-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Pan, 2002. "Goodness‐of‐fit Tests for GEE with Correlated Binary Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 29(1), pages 101-110, March.
    2. Siswadi & C. P. Quesenberry, 1982. "Selecting among weibull, lognormal and gamma distributions using complete and censored smaples," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 557-569, December.
    3. Gupta, Rameshwar D. & Kundu, Debasis, 2003. "Discriminating between Weibull and generalized exponential distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 179-196, June.
    4. Sukhdev Singh & Reza Arabi Belaghi & Mehri Noori Asl, 2019. "Estimation and prediction using classical and Bayesian approaches for Burr III model under progressive type-I hybrid censoring," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(4), pages 746-764, August.
    5. Ali Akbar Bromideh, 2012. "Discriminating Between Weibull and Log-Normal Distributions Based on Kullback-Leibler Divergence," Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics e-Journal, Department of Econometrics, Faculty of Economics, Istanbul University, vol. 16(1), pages 44-54, May.
    6. Balakrishnan, N. & Mi, Jie, 2003. "Existence and uniqueness of the MLEs for normal distribution based on general progressively Type-II censored samples," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 407-414, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Hui-Yi & Myers, Leann, 2006. "Power and Type I error rates of goodness-of-fit statistics for binomial generalized estimating equations (GEE) models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(12), pages 3432-3448, August.
    2. Zoran Vidović, 2019. "Bayesian Prediction of Order Statistics Based on k -Record Values from a Generalized Exponential Distribution," Stats, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-10, November.
    3. Subhankar Dutta & Sanku Dey & Suchandan Kayal, 2024. "Bayesian survival analysis of logistic exponential distribution for adaptive progressive Type-II censored data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 2109-2155, June.
    4. Chansoo Kim & Seongho Song, 2010. "Bayesian estimation of the parameters of the generalized exponential distribution from doubly censored samples," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 583-597, September.
    5. E. M. Almetwally & H. M. Almongy & M. K. Rastogi & M. Ibrahim, 2020. "Maximum Product Spacing Estimation of Weibull Distribution Under Adaptive Type-II Progressive Censoring Schemes," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 257-279, June.
    6. Basak, Prasanta & Basak, Indrani & Balakrishnan, N., 2009. "Estimation for the three-parameter lognormal distribution based on progressively censored data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(10), pages 3580-3592, August.
    7. Shovan Chowdhury, 2019. "Selection between Exponential and Lindley distributions," Working papers 316, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    8. Lan Wang & Annie Qu, 2009. "Consistent model selection and data‐driven smooth tests for longitudinal data in the estimating equations approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(1), pages 177-190, January.
    9. Andreas Blöchlinger & Markus Leippold, 2011. "A New Goodness-of-Fit Test for Event Forecasting and Its Application to Credit Defaults," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 487-505, March.
    10. Abdel-Hamid, Alaa H. & AL-Hussaini, Essam K., 2009. "Estimation in step-stress accelerated life tests for the exponentiated exponential distribution with type-I censoring," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1328-1338, February.
    11. Saieed Ateya, 2014. "Maximum likelihood estimation under a finite mixture of generalized exponential distributions based on censored data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 311-325, May.
    12. Chen, D.G. & Lio, Y.L., 2010. "Parameter estimations for generalized exponential distribution under progressive type-I interval censoring," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 1581-1591, June.
    13. Kim, Jin Seon & Yum, Bong-Jin, 2008. "Selection between Weibull and lognormal distributions: A comparative simulation study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 477-485, December.
    14. Chung-Wei Shen & Yi-Hau Chen, 2012. "Model Selection for Generalized Estimating Equations Accommodating Dropout Missingness," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1046-1054, December.
    15. Shinpei Imori, 2015. "Model Selection Criterion Based on the Multivariate Quasi-Likelihood for Generalized Estimating Equations," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(4), pages 1214-1224, December.
    16. Lemonte, Artur J., 2013. "A new exponential-type distribution with constant, decreasing, increasing, upside-down bathtub and bathtub-shaped failure rate function," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 149-170.
    17. Debasis Kundu & Anubhav Manglick, 2004. "Discriminating between the Weibull and log‐normal distributions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(6), pages 893-905, September.
    18. Kundu, Debasis & Gupta, Rameshwar D., 2007. "A convenient way of generating gamma random variables using generalized exponential distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(6), pages 2796-2802, March.
    19. Kuo-Chin Lin & Yi-Ju Chen, 2016. "Goodness-of-fit tests of generalized linear mixed models for repeated ordinal responses," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(11), pages 2053-2064, August.
    20. M. C. Pardo & R. Alonso, 2012. "A generalized Q--Q plot for longitudinal data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(11), pages 2349-2362, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:39:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s00180-023-01351-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.