IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v39y2024i2d10.1007_s00180-023-01328-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving upon the effective sample size based on Godambe information for block likelihood inference

Author

Listed:
  • Rahul Mukerjee

    (Indian Institute of Management Calcutta)

Abstract

We consider the effective sample size, based on Godambe information, for block likelihood inference which is an attractive and computationally feasible alternative to full likelihood inference for large correlated datasets. With reference to a Gaussian random field having a constant mean, we explore how the choice of blocks impacts this effective sample size. This is done by introducing a column-wise blocking method which spreads out the spatial points within each block, instead of keeping them close together as the existing row-wise blocking method does. It is seen that column-wise blocking can lead to considerable gains in effective sample size and efficiency compared to row-wise blocking, while retaining computational simplicity. Analytical results in this direction are obtained under the AR (1) model. The insights so found facilitate the study of other one-dimensional correlation models as well as correlation models on a plane, where closed form expressions are intractable. Simulations are seen to provide support to our conclusions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahul Mukerjee, 2024. "Improving upon the effective sample size based on Godambe information for block likelihood inference," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 891-904, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:39:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s00180-023-01328-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-023-01328-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-023-01328-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-023-01328-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Acosta, Jonathan & Alegría, Alfredo & Osorio, Felipe & Vallejos, Ronny, 2021. "Assessing the effective sample size for large spatial datasets: A block likelihood approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Ganggang Xu & Marc G. Genton, 2017. "Tukey -and- Random Fields," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(519), pages 1236-1249, July.
    3. Caragea, Petruta C. & Smith, Richard L., 2007. "Asymptotic properties of computationally efficient alternative estimators for a class of multivariate normal models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(7), pages 1417-1440, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Acosta, Jonathan & Alegría, Alfredo & Osorio, Felipe & Vallejos, Ronny, 2021. "Assessing the effective sample size for large spatial datasets: A block likelihood approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Masoud Faridi & Majid Jafari Khaledi, 2022. "The polar-generalized normal distribution: properties, Bayesian estimation and applications," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 571-603, April.
    3. Caamaño-Carrillo, Christian & Bevilacqua, Moreno & López, Cristian & Morales-Oñate, Víctor, 2024. "Nearest neighbors weighted composite likelihood based on pairs for (non-)Gaussian massive spatial data with an application to Tukey-hh random fields estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Krupskii, Pavel & Huser, Raphaël, 2024. "Max-convolution processes with random shape indicator kernels," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    5. Bhat, Chandra R. & Sener, Ipek N. & Eluru, Naveen, 2010. "A flexible spatially dependent discrete choice model: Formulation and application to teenagers' weekday recreational activity participation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 903-921, September.
    6. Denis Allard & Lucia Clarotto & Thomas Opitz & Thomas Romary, 2021. "Discussion on “Competition on Spatial Statistics for Large Datasets”," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(4), pages 604-611, December.
    7. Stanislav Anatolyev & Renat Khabibullin & Artem Prokhorov, 2012. "Reconstructing high dimensional dynamic distributions from distributions of lower dimension," Working Papers 12003, Concordia University, Department of Economics.
    8. Felipe Tagle & Marc G. Genton & Andrew Yip & Suleiman Mostamandi & Georgiy Stenchikov & Stefano Castruccio, 2020. "A high‐resolution bilevel skew‐t stochastic generator for assessing Saudi Arabia's wind energy resources," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(7), November.
    9. Sameh Abdulah & Yuxiao Li & Jian Cao & Hatem Ltaief & David E. Keyes & Marc G. Genton & Ying Sun, 2023. "Large‐scale environmental data science with ExaGeoStatR," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), February.
    10. Quan Vu & Yi Cao & Josh Jacobson & Alan R. Pearse & Andrew Zammit-Mangion, 2021. "Discussion on “Competition on Spatial Statistics for Large Datasets”," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(4), pages 614-618, December.
    11. Moreno Bevilacqua & Christian Caamaño-Carrillo & Reinaldo B. Arellano-Valle & Camilo Gómez, 2022. "A class of random fields with two-piece marginal distributions for modeling point-referenced data with spatial outliers," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(3), pages 644-674, September.
    12. Huang Huang & Sameh Abdulah & Ying Sun & Hatem Ltaief & David E. Keyes & Marc G. Genton, 2021. "Competition on Spatial Statistics for Large Datasets," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(4), pages 580-595, December.
    13. Mahmoudian, Behzad, 2018. "On the existence of some skew-Gaussian random field models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 331-335.
    14. Morales-Oñate, Víctor & Crudu, Federico & Bevilacqua, Moreno, 2021. "Blockwise Euclidean likelihood for spatio-temporal covariance models," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 176-201.
    15. Daniel A. Griffith & Richard E. Plant, 2022. "Statistical Analysis in the Presence of Spatial Autocorrelation: Selected Sampling Strategy Effects," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Wanfang Chen & Marc G. Genton, 2023. "Are You All Normal? It Depends!," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(1), pages 114-139, April.
    17. W. D. Walls & Jordi McKenzie, 2020. "Black swan models for the entertainment industry with an application to the movie business," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(6), pages 3019-3032, December.
    18. Erhardt, Tobias Michael & Czado, Claudia & Schepsmeier, Ulf, 2015. "Spatial composite likelihood inference using local C-vines," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 74-88.
    19. Bhat, Chandra R., 2011. "The maximum approximate composite marginal likelihood (MACML) estimation of multinomial probit-based unordered response choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 923-939, August.
    20. Jinyuan Chang & Wen Zhou & Wen-Xin Zhou & Lan Wang, 2017. "Comparing large covariance matrices under weak conditions on the dependence structure and its application to gene clustering," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 31-41, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:39:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s00180-023-01328-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.