IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v16y2018i4d10.1007_s40258-018-0392-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uptake of and Expenditure on Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents for Hepatitis C Treatment in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara de Graaff

    (University of Tasmania)

  • Kwang Chien Yee

    (University of Tasmania)

  • Philip Clarke

    (University of Melbourne)

  • Andrew Palmer

    (University of Tasmania)

Abstract

Background Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have revolutionised treatment for the hepatitis C virus (HCV). Currently, treatment costs between 20,000 and 80,000 Australian dollars ($A) per patient. The Australian Federal Government provided $A1 billion over 5 years to subsidise these drugs. Objective The aim of this paper was to evaluate the uptake and financial impact of DAA prescribing in Australia. Methods We undertook a retrospective analysis of Medicare prescription and expenditure data for March 2016 to August 2017. Prescription numbers and expenditure data were extracted from the Medicare Statistical Reports website. Numbers of prescriptions were converted to per capita rates. HCV prevalence measures were used to provide context to prescription rates. All costs were reported in $A, year 2017 values. Results Nationally, 211,184 DAA prescriptions were reimbursed. Whilst $A3.6 billion was expended through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, confidential pricing agreements precluded calculation of the precise cost. In 18 months, estimated expenditure greatly exceeded the $A1 billion in funding for 5 years. Nationally, the rate of prescriptions was 872/100,000 individuals. Prescription rates were highest in the Australian Capital Territory (1087/100,000) and lowest in Western Australia (625/100,000) despite HCV prevalence being comparable to the national rate in both regions. Conclusions Uptake of DAAs has been enthusiastic in the first 18 months of this funding agreement. However, the lack of transparency due to the confidential special pricing agreements means actual government expenditure is unknown. Post-marketing review by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee may enable renegotiation of DAA prices with the sponsors.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara de Graaff & Kwang Chien Yee & Philip Clarke & Andrew Palmer, 2018. "Uptake of and Expenditure on Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents for Hepatitis C Treatment in Australia," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 495-502, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:16:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s40258-018-0392-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-018-0392-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-018-0392-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-018-0392-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beth Woods & Rita Faria & Susan Griffin, 2016. "Assessing the Value of New Treatments for Hepatitis C: Are International Decision Makers Getting this Right?," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 427-433, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ru Han & Clément François & Mondher Toumi, 2021. "Systematic Review of Health State Utility Values Used in European Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations for Chronic Hepatitis C: Impact on Cost-Effectiveness Results," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 29-44, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexis Llewellyn & Rita Faria & Beth Woods & Mark Simmonds & James Lomas & Nerys Woolacott & Susan Griffin, 2016. "Daclatasvir for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C: A Critique of the Clinical and Economic Evidence," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 34(10), pages 981-992, October.
    2. Sebastian Hinde & Louise Horsfield & Laura Bojke & Gerry Richardson, 2020. "The Relevant Perspective of Economic Evaluations Informing Local Decision Makers: An Exploration in Weight Loss Services," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 351-356, June.
    3. Max J. Korman & Kjetil Retterstøl & Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen & Torbjørn Wisløff, 2018. "Are PCSK9 Inhibitors Cost Effective?," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 36(9), pages 1031-1041, September.
    4. Torbjørn Wisløff & Richard White & Olav Dalgard & Ellen J. Amundsen & Hinta Meijerink & Astrid Louise Løvlie & Hilde Kløvstad, 2018. "Economic Evaluation of Direct-Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C in Norway," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 36(5), pages 591-601, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:16:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s40258-018-0392-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.