IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v335y2024i1d10.1007_s10479-023-05642-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

HBagging-MCDM: an ensemble classifier combined with multiple criteria decision making for rectal cancer survival prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Fengyu Zhang

    (Central South University)

  • Xihua Li

    (Central South University)

Abstract

As a main type of colorectal cancer, rectal cancer has a high risk and mortality rate so it is very important to accurately predict the survivability of patients to make better decisions on medical treatment and preparation for medical expenses. In recent years, many scholars have studied the survivability of selected common cancers such as lung cancer using machine learning approaches. Therefore, this research proposes a heterogeneous ensemble classification model to predict the survivability of rectal cancer patients. The model employs four different types of classifiers as component classifiers and Bagging algorithm to generate example sets for training component classifiers. In the proposed model, heterogeneous ensemble can help improve the diversity of component classifiers and Bagging can lower the variance and enhance the stability of the model. Finally, a fuzzy multiple criteria decision making method named fuzzy TOPSIS is employed to fuse the results of component classifiers. We evaluated the proposed model on the rectal cancer patient records dataset extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The results show that the proposed model obtains a significant improvement in terms of four standard metrics, including accuracy, specificity, sensitivity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, compared with single component classifiers and some other state-of-the-art ensemble classification models, such as Random Forest and Gradient Boosting Tree. Experiments also show that fusing component classifiers with fuzzy TOPSIS is superior to voting and simple weighted average methods. The proposed model outperforms other techniques in rectal cancer survival prediction, thereby improving the prognosis of rectal cancer patients and further assisting clinicians in developing better treatment plans.

Suggested Citation

  • Fengyu Zhang & Xihua Li, 2024. "HBagging-MCDM: an ensemble classifier combined with multiple criteria decision making for rectal cancer survival prediction," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 335(1), pages 469-490, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:335:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05642-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-023-05642-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-023-05642-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-023-05642-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. West, David & Mangiameli, Paul & Rampal, Rohit & West, Vivian, 2005. "Ensemble strategies for a medical diagnostic decision support system: A breast cancer diagnosis application," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(2), pages 532-551, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brandner, Hubertus & Lessmann, Stefan & Voß, Stefan, 2013. "A memetic approach to construct transductive discrete support vector machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 581-595.
    2. Yi Du & Hua Yu & Zhijun Li, 0. "Research of SVM ensembles in medical examination scheduling," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-11.
    3. Wang, Haifeng & Zheng, Bichen & Yoon, Sang Won & Ko, Hoo Sang, 2018. "A support vector machine-based ensemble algorithm for breast cancer diagnosis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 687-699.
    4. Salonee Patel & Manan Shah, 2023. "A Comprehensive Study on Implementing Big Data in the Auditing Industry," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 657-677, June.
    5. Abellán, Joaquín & Masegosa, Andrés R., 2010. "An ensemble method using credal decision trees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 218-226, August.
    6. János Tóth & Henrietta Tomán & Gabriella Hajdu & András Hajdu, 2023. "Using Noisy Evaluation to Accelerate Parameter Optimization of Medical Image Segmentation Ensembles," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Lessmann, Stefan & Sung, Ming-Chien & Johnson, Johnnie E.V. & Ma, Tiejun, 2012. "A new methodology for generating and combining statistical forecasting models to enhance competitive event prediction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 163-174.
    8. Wang, Fan & Zhang, Shengfan & Henderson, Louise M., 2018. "Adaptive decision-making of breast cancer mammography screening: A heuristic-based regression model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 70-84.
    9. Tom Lindström & Michael Tildesley & Colleen Webb, 2015. "A Bayesian Ensemble Approach for Epidemiological Projections," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-30, April.
    10. Yi Du & Hua Yu & Zhijun Li, 2021. "Research of SVM ensembles in medical examination scheduling," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 1042-1052, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:335:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05642-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.