IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/agrhuv/v34y2017i3d10.1007_s10460-016-9750-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What’s good for the soil is good for the soul: scientific farming, environmental subjectivities, and the ethics of stewardship in southwestern Oklahoma

Author

Listed:
  • Tony N. VanWinkle

    (University of Oklahoma)

  • Jack R. Friedman

    (University of Oklahoma)

Abstract

Based on 10 months of mixed ethnographic and archival research, this study is concerned with ways in which contemporary agro-environmental subjectivities and practices in a southwestern Oklahoma farming community are rooted in the massive state-level interventions of the New Deal era and their successors. We are likewise concerned with how those interventions have become interdigitated with moral discourses and community ethics, as simultaneous expressions of both farmers’ identities and the systems of power in which they practice farming. Through historic and ethnographic evidence, we demonstrate the ways in which the localization of American agricultural conservation and the attendant, edificatory role of resource bureaucracies have shaped contemporary practices and ideologies of natural resource stewardship among conventional farmers and ranchers.

Suggested Citation

  • Tony N. VanWinkle & Jack R. Friedman, 2017. "What’s good for the soil is good for the soul: scientific farming, environmental subjectivities, and the ethics of stewardship in southwestern Oklahoma," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(3), pages 607-618, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:34:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10460-016-9750-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10460-016-9750-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10460-016-9750-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10460-016-9750-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lowdermilk, W. C., 1953. "Conquest of the Land through Seven Thousand Years," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309018, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Donald Worster, 1985. "A sense of soil: Agricultural conservation and American culture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 2(4), pages 28-35, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Doughty, Russell & Xiao, Xiangming & Wu, Xiaocui & Zhang, Yao & Bajgain, Rajen & Zhou, Yuting & Qin, Yuanwei & Zou, Zhenhua & McCarthy, Heather & Friedman, Jack & Wagle, Pradeep & Basara, Jeff & Stein, 2018. "Responses of gross primary production of grasslands and croplands under drought, pluvial, and irrigation conditions during 2010–2016, Oklahoma, USA," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 47-59.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hammes, Brian D., 1984. "Hedonic prices for farmland characteristics: an analysis of farm transactions prices for Iowa," ISU General Staff Papers 1984010108000017525, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Bjornlund, Vibeke & Bjornlund, Henning, 2019. "Understanding agricultural water management in a historical context using a socioeconomic and biophysical framework," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 454-467.
    3. Mason Gaffney, 2016. "Nature, Economy, and Equity: Sacred Water, Profane Markets," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(5), pages 1064-1231, November.
    4. John Miller, 1987. "Land and water Issues from A humanistic perspective," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 4(4), pages 54-55, September.
    5. Schaller, W. Neill, 1993. "Farm Policies and the Sustainability of Agriculture: Rethinking the Connections," Policy Studies Program Reports, Henry A. Wallace Institute for Alternative Agriculture, number 134103, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:34:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10460-016-9750-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.