IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sph/rjedep/v7y2018i3p6-13.html

A Study of Intellectual Property Right on Micro Small and Medium Enterprises: Case Study TanjungBumi Batik

Author

Listed:
  • John Siska Maya

    (Indraprasta PGRI University, South Jakarta, Indonesia)

  • Siswi Wulandari

    (Indraprasta PGRI University, South Jakarta, Indonesia)

  • Indah Purnamasari

    (Indraprasta PGRI University, South Jakarta, Indonesia)

Abstract

The contribution of Batik industry has exceptional influence for the Indonesian economy. The value of batik and batik products in 2017 reached 58, 46 million us dollars. Indonesian batik is exported to Japan, United State of America, and Europe (Cabinet Secretary Republic of Indonesia, 2018). In giving incentive towards creativity and innovation to the batik industry, the government have an important role as a regulator. This research used qualitative and investigation method. Based on the result of the investigation, the mindset in micro small and medium enterprises that Intellectual property right is not something urgent for them. This is contradicted with Ika Janita Dewi (2014) which said intellectual property right has contribution towards economy in output, added value, and employment. For micro small and medium enterprises, their main problems are capital and marketing. The local government as a stakeholder or extension of central government play an active role in solving the problems of intellectual property right especially in batik industry. This will be an incentive for the batik creativity and innovation in the long term)

Suggested Citation

  • John Siska Maya & Siswi Wulandari & Indah Purnamasari, 2018. "A Study of Intellectual Property Right on Micro Small and Medium Enterprises: Case Study TanjungBumi Batik," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 7(3), pages 6-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sph:rjedep:v:7:y:2018:i:3:p:6-13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jedep.spiruharet.ro/RePEc/sph/rjedep/JEDEP26_1Siska_P6-13.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doh, Soogwan & Kim, Byungkyu, 2014. "Government support for SME innovations in the regional industries: The case of government financial support program in South Korea," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(9), pages 1557-1569.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zon-Yau Lee & Mei-Tai Chu & Shiuann-Shuoh Chen & Chih-Hung Tsai, 2018. "Identifying Comprehensive Key Criteria of Sustainable Development for Traditional Manufacturing in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Hyejin Jang & Keeeun Lee & Byungun Yoon, 2017. "Development Of An Open Innovation Model For R&D Collaboration Between Large Firms And Small-Medium Enterprises (Smes) In Manufacturing Industries," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-29, January.
    3. Basit Shoaib Abdul & Kuhn Thomas & Ahmed Mumtaz, 2018. "The Effect of Government Subsidy on Non-Technological Innovation and Firm Performance in the Service Sector: Evidence from Germany," Business Systems Research, Paradigm, vol. 9(1), pages 118-137, March.
    4. Jing Huang & Linda Krull & Rosemarie Ziedonis, 2020. "R&D Investments and Tax Incentives: The Role of Intra‐Firm Cross‐Border Collaboration," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 2523-2557, December.
    5. Stephanie E. Mansion & Andreas Bausch, 2020. "Intangible assets and SMEs’ export behavior: a meta-analytical perspective," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 727-760, October.
    6. Hye-Young Joo & Hyunsuk Suh, 2017. "The Effects of Government Support on Corporate Performance Hedging against International Environmental Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-25, October.
    7. Luis Enrique Valdez Juarez & Elba Alicia Ramos Escobar & Gonzalo Maldonado Guzman, 2017. "The Effects of Absorptive Capacity, Intellectual Property and Innovation in SMEs," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(4), pages 36-50, December.
    8. Youngwook Ko & Yanghon Chung & Hangyeol Seo, 2020. "Coopetition for Sustainable Competitiveness: R&D Collaboration in Perspective of Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Hong, Jin & Feng, Bing & Wu, Yanrui & Wang, Liangbing, 2016. "Do government grants promote innovation efficiency in China's high-tech industries?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 57, pages 4-13.
    10. Sahar Afshan & Arshian Sharif & Abdelmohsen A. Nassani & Muhammad M. Q. Abro & Rubeena Batool & Khalid Zaman, 2021. "The role of information and communication technology (internet penetration) on Asian stock market efficiency: Evidence from quantile‐on‐quantile cointegration and causality approach," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 2307-2324, April.
    11. Bischoff, Thore Sören & Hipp, Ann & Runst, Petrik, 2023. "Firm innovation and generalized trust as a regional resource," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    12. Lanouar Charfeddine & Mohamed Ismail Umlai & Mazen El-Masri, 2024. "Impact of financial literacy, perceived access to finance, ICT use, and digitization on credit constraints: evidence from Qatari MSME importers," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-37, December.
    13. Hao Xiling & Chen Zhongxia & Liu Yiran & Zhu Zhaozhen & Du Jingjing, 2026. "Fear of Failure and Innovativeness of Opportunities-Moderating Roles of Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy and Government Support," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 97-125.
    14. Gupta, Himanshu & Barua, Mukesh Kumar, 2016. "Identifying enablers of technological innovation for Indian MSMEs using best–worst multi criteria decision making method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 69-79.
    15. Mukhamad Najib & Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahman & Farah Fahma, 2021. "Business Survival of Small and Medium-Sized Restaurants through a Crisis: The Role of Government Support and Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, September.
    16. Liu, Rebecca & Rammer, Christian, 2016. "The contribution of different public innovation funding programs to SMEs' export performance," ZEW Discussion Papers 16-078, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    17. Jian Wen & Shiwei Su, 2023. "An Empirical Analysis of the Synergistic Effect of Urban Pilot Policies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, April.
    18. Yu, Anyu & Zhang, Qin & Yu, Rongjian & Cheng, Yu, 2023. "More is better or in waste? A resource allocation measure of government grants for facilitating firm innovations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    19. Firman Menne & Sukmawati Mardjuni & Muhammad Yusuf & Muhlis Ruslan & A. Arifuddin & Iskandar Iskandar, 2023. "Sharia Economy, Islamic Financial Performance and Factors That Influence It—Evidence from Indonesia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, April.
    20. Yang Songling & Muhammad Ishtiaq & Muhammad Anwar & Hamid Ahmed, 2018. "The Role of Government Support in Sustainable Competitive Position and Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sph:rjedep:v:7:y:2018:i:3:p:6-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Tonis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jedep.spiruharet.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.