IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sls/ipmsls/v29y20156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Progress on the Mystery of Productivity: A Review Article on the OECD Report 'The Future of Productivity'

Author

Listed:
  • Don Drummond

Abstract

For decades the OECD has been a leader in the research of productivity and the development of policy ideas to strengthen it. Yet many countries, including Canada, that have implemented the OECD paradigm reasonably faithfully have not experienced strong productivity. Indeed, many OECD members, again including Canada, have experienced a decline in multi-factor productivity over the past 15 years. The record makes it fair to conclude that the OECD has not cracked the mysteries of productivity. So when the organization releases a new study under the bold title of The Future of Productivity certain questions are natural. Does the OECD have new and different perspectives to add? Will these perspectives lead to policy ideas that will succeed in raising productivity growth among member countries? The answer to the first question is a resounding yes. The OECD flags, quite appropriately, that the research needs to go beyond the so-called policy fundamentals and examine the behavior or firms, particularly why some firms so badly lag others in productivity. The OECD also now places much more emphasis on how human talent is allocated to jobs. This also seems promising. Whether such new directions of research will finally crack the mystery of productivity remains to be seen. But the OECD research program is heading in the right direction and warrants close attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Don Drummond, 2015. "Progress on the Mystery of Productivity: A Review Article on the OECD Report 'The Future of Productivity'," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 29, pages 83-88, Fall.
  • Handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:29:y:2015:6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.csls.ca/ipm/29/drummond.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Don Drummond, 2011. "Confessions of a Serial Productivity Researcher," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 22, pages 3-10, Fall.
    2. Don Drummond, 2006. "The Economists' Manifesto for Curing Ailing Canadian Productivity," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 13, pages 21-26, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mathieu Dufour & Ellen Russell, 2015. "Why Isn't Productivity More Popular? A Bargaining Power Approach to the Pay/Productivity Linkage in Canada," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 28, pages 47-62, Spring.
    2. Michael J. Harper & Alice O. Nakamura & Lu Zhang, 2012. "Difficulties Assessing Multifactor Productivity for Canada," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 24, pages 76-84, Fall.
    3. Jacob Greenspon & Anna Stansbury & Lawrence H. Summers, 2021. "Productivity and Pay in the United States and Canada," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 41, pages 3-30, Fall.
    4. Petr Hanel, 2007. "Skills required for innovation: A review of the literature," Cahiers de recherche 07-23, Departement d'économique de l'École de gestion à l'Université de Sherbrooke.
    5. Don Drummond, 2021. "ViewPoint: Canada Should Establish an Equitable Growth Institute," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 40, pages 105-117, Spring.
    6. Andrew Sharpe, 2007. "Three Policies to Improve Productivity Growth in Canada," CSLS Research Reports 2007-05, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    7. Don Drummond & Annette Ryan & Michael R. Veall, 2013. "Improving Canada's Productivity Performance: The Potential Contribution of Firm-level Productivity Research," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 26, pages 86-93, Fall.
    8. Andrew Sharpe & Ricardo de Avillez, 2012. "A Detailed Analysis of Nova Soctia;s Productivty Performance, 1997-2010," CSLS Research Reports 2012-05, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Productivity; Canada; OECD;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence
    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • N32 - Economic History - - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy - - - U.S.; Canada: 1913-

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:29:y:2015:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CSLS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cslssca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.