IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sen/journl/v7i2y2006p287-307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of the Policy Framework for the Effectiveness of Benchmarking in Regulatory Proceedings

Author

Listed:
  • P. Burns
  • C. Jenkins
  • C. Riechmann
  • M. Mikkers

Abstract

Regulation is an information problem. In this paper we show that benchmarking can have an important role to play in extracting information and providing efficiency incentives. However, the effectiveness of this role depends both on the credibility of the regulator to undertake a comparative efficiency analysis, and the impact of the benchmarking on the value of the firm. These are both affected by the policy framework within which the regulator operates. In Britain the regulator is not obliged to undertake any benchmarking, and the impact of the benchmarking that has been undertaken has been relatively low. These conditions have the effect of diminishing incentives for both information provision by the companies and model developments by the regulator. In the Netherlands, the impact on business value is high because benchmarking sets the price differentials from which a yardstick competition model – required by law – is implemented. These twin conditions of high credibility and high impact on value both sharpen incentives for the businesses to reveal information at the time of the benchmarking and also provide a stimulus for the regulator to properly account for firm-specific effects. In Austria, where similar conditions to the Netherlands have been established, we described the regulator’s attempts to improve the robustness of the cost drivers in the model.

Suggested Citation

  • P. Burns & C. Jenkins & C. Riechmann & M. Mikkers, 2006. "The Role of the Policy Framework for the Effectiveness of Benchmarking in Regulatory Proceedings," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 7(2), pages 287-307, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:7:i:2:y:2006:p:287-307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haney, Aoife Brophy & Pollitt, Michael G., 2011. "Exploring the determinants of “best practice” benchmarking in electricity network regulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 7739-7746.
    2. Chen Lin & Sanford Berg, 2008. "Incorporating Service Quality into Yardstick Regulation: An Application to the Peru Water Sector," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 32(1), pages 53-75, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:7:i:2:y:2006:p:287-307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petra Van den Bempt (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.crninet.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.