IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sek/jijote/v5y2017i2p32-56.html

Are females better language learners-From an aspect of Multiple Intelligences and ambiguity tolerance

Author

Listed:
  • Yen-ju Hou

    (Shu Zen Junior College of Medicine and Management)

  • Yi-an Hou

    (St.Mary's Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management)

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate, from an aspect of multiple intelligences (MI) and second language tolerance of ambiguity (SLTA), to see why females are always regarded as better language learners. Subjects were 284 college students in Taiwan, including 81 males and 203 females. The research instruments were surveys of Multiple Intelligences (MI) (Gardner, 1983) and Second Language Tolerance of Ambiguity Scale (SLTAS) (Ely, 1995). In addition, students? English levels of Taiwan College Entrance Exam were used as their English proficiency. All available data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics derived from SPSS 17. The results of the study revealed that females were really supported to be better language learners. Some implications derived from the findings were provided for more effective language teaching and learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Yen-ju Hou & Yi-an Hou, 2017. "Are females better language learners-From an aspect of Multiple Intelligences and ambiguity tolerance," International Journal of Teaching and Education, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 5(2), pages 32-56, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:jijote:v:5:y:2017:i:2:p:32-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/international-journal-of-teaching-education/publication-detail-1402
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://iises.net/international-journal-of-teaching-education/publication-detail-1402?download=3
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amin Marzban & Hossein Barati & Ahmad Moinzadeh, 2012. "An Investigation into Ambiguity Tolerance in Iranian Senior EFL Undergraduates," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(1), pages 1-76, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;

      JEL classification:

      • I29 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Other

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:jijote:v:5:y:2017:i:2:p:32-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijote.iises.net/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.