IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sdo/regaec/v35y2026i1_4.html

The Inertia Trap: Explaining the Attitude-Intention Gap in Young Indonesian Consumers’ Switch to Sustainable Fashion

Author

Listed:
  • Andika, Andika

  • Harisa Putri, Wika

  • Nur Anisah, Tiara

Abstract

This study examines the determinants of young Indonesian consumers’ intention to switch (ITS) from fast fashion to more sustainable alternatives. Integrating the theory of reasoned action (TRA) with status quo bias (SQB), it explores how social media influence and perceived product durability shape pro-environmental attitudes, and how perceived inertia moderates the attitude–intention relationship. A quantitative survey of 306 Gen Z and millennial consumers was analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings reveal that social media exposure and perceptions of durability significantly strengthen pro-environmental attitudes, enhancing ITS. However, perceived inertia acts as a psychological constraint, weakening the effect of positive attitudes. By bridging motivational and constraint-based perspectives, this study extends TRA by including SQB, offering nuanced insights into the persistent attitude–intention gap in sustainable consumption and the behavioral dynamics of digitally engaged youth in emerging markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Andika, Andika & Harisa Putri, Wika & Nur Anisah, Tiara, 2026. "The Inertia Trap: Explaining the Attitude-Intention Gap in Young Indonesian Consumers’ Switch to Sustainable Fashion," Revista Galega de Economía, University of Santiago de Compostela. Faculty of Economics and Business., vol. 35(1), pages 1-30.
  • Handle: RePEc:sdo:regaec:v:35:y:2026:i:1_4
    DOI: 10.15304/rge.35.1.10996
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15304/rge.35.1.10996
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15304/rge.35.1.10996?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xianfeng Hu & Shanyong Wang & Rongting Zhou & Lan Gao & Zujun Zhu, 2024. "Determinants of consumers’ intentions to switch to electric vehicles: a perspective of the push–pull–mooring framework," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(14), pages 3718-3743, December.
    2. Maria-Jesus Agost & Margarita Vergara, 2020. "Principles of Affective Design in Consumers’ Response to Sustainability Design Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-21, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goran Skataric & Velibor Spalevic & Svetislav Popovic & Nenad Perosevic & Rajko Novicevic, 2021. "The Vernacular and Rural Houses of Agrarian Areas in the Zeta Region, Montenegro," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-35, July.
    2. Jianfeng Wu & Chuchu Jin & Lekai Zhang & Li Zhang & Ming Li & Xuan Dong, 2021. "Emotionally Sustainable Design Toolbox: A Card-Based Design Tool for Designing Products with an Extended Life Based on the User’s Emotional Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Shaorong Ji & Pang-Soong Lin, 2022. "Aesthetics of Sustainability: Research on the Design Strategies for Emotionally Durable Visual Communication Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Elena Mulet & Vicente Chulvi & Marta Royo, 2022. "Analysis of attachment factors in small household EEE: An opportunity toward the circular economy," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1364-1377, August.
    5. Seonju Kam, 2021. "Three-Dimensional Printing Fashion Product Design with Emotional Durability Based on Korean Aesthetics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • L67 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Other Consumer Nondurables: Clothing, Textiles, Shoes, and Leather Goods; Household Goods; Sports Equipment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sdo:regaec:v:35:y:2026:i:1_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marisa Chas-Amil (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.