IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/mngsci/y2016i4p33-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

КОЭФФИЦИЕНТЫ ОБЪЕКТИВНОЙ ОЦЕНКИ ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТИ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЙ СЛУЖБЫ // Objective Аssessment Indicies of Public Administration Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • G. Bortshevsky A.

    (Russian presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Георгий Борщевский Александрович

    (Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте РФ)

Abstract

The modern management concepts are oriented to raising the public bodies’ accountability to the society. In the meantime the development of tools for the assessment of state activity is becoming up-to-date. Public administration is the central sector in the public administration system as it particularly provides the implementation of public policy in all the spheres. That’s why the development of objective assessment indices of public administration efficiency measures up the goals of the modern reforming stage. Some approaches to defining the concept of efficiency and assessment methods of state efficiency are analyzed in the article; it’s summed up that there are a lot of approaches to the efficiency assessment of regional administrations and separate federal government agencies activity. They are based on empirical data quantity analysis. The Russian legislation has all the grounds for the assessment of public administration efficiency, but the application tools haven’t been currently implemented. The indicators choice is justified which characterizes the public administration efficiency from its internal development point of view and its final social and economic effect from its functioning. The methodology of defining the common assessment index of public administration efficiency is suggested which is aimed at denoting the milestones for the further public administration reforming taking into account the historical experience and mistakes. The important advantage of the suggested common index is its calculation simplicity for different periods of time. Современные концепции управления ориентированы на повышение подотчетности государственных органов обществу. При этом становится актуальной разработка механизмов для оценки деятельности государства. Государственная служба является центральным звеном системы государственного управления, так как именно она обеспечивает реализацию политики государства во всех сферах. Именно поэтому разработка коэффициентов объективной оценки эффективности государственной службы отвечает целям современного этапа реформирования. В статье проанализированы некоторые подходы к определению понятия эффективности и методики оценки эффективности государства; сделан вывод, что в отечественной практике существует ряд подходов к оценке эффективности деятельности региональных администраций и отдельных федеральных органов власти. В их основе лежит количественный анализ эмпирических данных. Российское законодательство имеет предпосылки для оценки эффективности системы государственной службы, но прикладные инструменты к настоящему времени не внедрены. Обоснован выбор показателей, характеризующих эффективность государственной службы с позиций внутреннего развития и конечного социально-экономического эффекта от ее функционирования. Предложена методика определения общего коэффициента эффективности государственной службы, который призван обозначить ориентиры для дальнейшего реформирования государственной службы с учетом исторического опыта и ошибок. Важным преимуществом предлагаемого общего коэффициента является простота и возможность расчета его значений для различных периодов времени.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Bortshevsky A. & Георгий Борщевский Александрович, 2016. "КОЭФФИЦИЕНТЫ ОБЪЕКТИВНОЙ ОЦЕНКИ ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТИ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЙ СЛУЖБЫ // Objective Аssessment Indicies of Public Administration Efficiency," Управленческие науки // Management Science, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 6(4), pages 33-43.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:mngsci:y:2016:i:4:p:33-43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/80/81.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George Borshchevskiy, 2015. "The application of quantitative methods for the study of civil service reform," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 147-172.
    2. Rachel M. Gisselquist & Danielle Resnick & Sarah Repucci, 2014. "Designing Effective Civil Service Reform Lessons From Past Experience," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 34(3), pages 207-218, August.
    3. Seong Soo Oh & Gregory B. Lewis, 2013. "Performance Ratings and Career Advancement in the US Federal Civil Service," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 740-761, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hang Duong, 2021. "The politicization of civil service recruitment and promotion in Vietnam," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(2), pages 51-62, May.
    2. John D. Marvel, 2020. "Evolution and egalitarianism: A behavioral account of managers' performance pay decisions," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:mngsci:y:2016:i:4:p:33-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://managementscience.elpub.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.