IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/financ/y2018i2p148-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

«Фондовое» Кредитование Как Эффективный Инструмент Государственной Поддержки Аграриев // “Fund” Lending As An Effective Tool Of State Support For Farmers

Author

Listed:
  • A. Tikhonova V.

    (Financial university)

  • А. Тихонова В.

    (Финансовый университет)

Abstract

The article is devoted to the topical problem of the development of agro-industrial complex, in particular, the development of the novelty model of agricultural lending. Experience of crediting of agriculture inRussiasince 1992 till now is considered. We provide a critical approach to the assessment of the current system of agricultural credit, which requires the presence of another economic incentive — the budget subsidy.Our purpose was a comprehensive author’s study of the problems of applying the practice of preferential agricultural lending, as well as the development of proposals aimed at improving the system of state support for the agricultural credit system.The methodological tools of the research include comparative methods of analysis, as well as analytical methods of cognition.We carried out the analysis of the models of crediting of farmers applied for the specified period and the main problems in practice of their application. As the most effective model of farmer’s lending defined “fund” model, used from 1997 to 2001. The main drawback of this system is the fragmentation of property interest in the subject of agriculture in a single loan obligation. The author developed a new system of agricultural lending, based on the “fond” model of the 90s. Its distinctive feature is dual targeting — for in economic entities (small and large businesses) and credit institutions (banks and credit cooperatives), while at the same time with maintaining a high level of state control (which is provided by a single source of credit resources — the state).The results of the study can be used in the development of both individual credit measures of state support for agricultural producers, and in the preparation of the State program of development of agriculture and regulation of markets of agricultural products, raw materials and food. Статья посвящена актуальной проблеме: анализу системы кредитования сельхозпроизводителей в России и разработке инновационной модели агрокредитования. Рассматривается опыт кредитования сельского хозяйства в России с1992 г. до настоящего времени. Применяется критический подход к оценке действующей системы аграрного кредитования, предполагающей обязательное наличие другого экономического стимула — бюджетной субсидии.Цель статьи — комплексное авторское исследование проблем применения практики льготного аграрного кредитования, а также разработка предложений, направленных на совершенствование государственной поддержки сельскохозяйственной кредитной системы.Методический инструментарий исследования включает сравнительные методы анализа, а также аналитические методы познания.Проведен анализ применяемых за указанный период моделей кредитования отрасли, определены основные проблемы в практике их применения. В качестве наиболее эффективной модели сельского кредитования определена «фондовая» модель, применяемая с 1997 по2001 г. Основной недостаток такой системы — разорванность имущественного интереса субъекта сельского хозяйства в едином кредитном обязательстве. Автором разработана новая система агрокредитования, основанная на фондовой модели 90-х гг. Ее отличительная черта — дуалистичность по субъектам хозяйствования (малый и крупный бизнес) и кредитным институтам (банки и кредитные кооперативы) при одновременном высоком уровне государственного контроля (который обеспечивается за счет единого источника кредитных ресурсов — государства).Результаты проведенного исследования могут быть использованы при разработке как отдельных кредитных мероприятий государственной поддержки сельскохозяйственных товаропроизводителей, так и при составлении Государственной программы развития сельского хозяйства и регулирования рынков сельскохозяйственной продукции, сырья и продовольствия.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Tikhonova V. & А. Тихонова В., 2018. "«Фондовое» Кредитование Как Эффективный Инструмент Государственной Поддержки Аграриев // “Fund” Lending As An Effective Tool Of State Support For Farmers," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 22(2), pages 148-159.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2018:i:2:p:148-159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/652/486.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gunderson, Michael A. & Gloy, Brent A. & LaDue, Eddy L., 2003. "Profitability Of Agricultural Lending Relationships," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22054, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Zinchenko, Aleksey & Ukolova, Anna, 2014. "О Программе Всероссийской Сельскохозяйственной Переписи 2016 Года [On the programme for the 2016 Russia census of agriculture]," MPRA Paper 71722, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Demichev, Vadim, 2016. "Statistical research of development of integration processes in Russian agriculture," MPRA Paper 74608, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 17 Oct 2016.
    2. Ukolova, Anna & Dashieva, Bayarma, 2016. "Statistical research of labor resources of agriculture in the USA (according to the 2012 Census of agriculture)," MPRA Paper 71663, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 31 May 2016.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2018:i:2:p:148-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://financetp.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.