IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/accntn/y2018i5p24-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Учетно-аналитические источники идентификации экономических рисков // Accounting and Analytical Sources of Economic Risks Identifcation

Author

Listed:
  • T. Serebryakova Yu.

    (Russian University of Cooperation)

  • O. Gordeeva G.

    (Russian University of Cooperation)

  • O. Kurtayeva Yu.

    (Russian University of Cooperation)

  • Т. Серебрякова Ю.

    (Российский университет кооперации)

  • О. Гордеева Г.

    (Российский университет кооперации)

  • О. Куртаева Ю.

    (Российский университет кооперации)

Abstract

The growth of the economy of an enterprise necessitates the use of risk-oriented approach to numerous management systems. Control is no exception. Risk-based control has risk management as a foundation. Risk management means taking risks into account and their analysis. An interesting methodological problem is to research the methodological opportunities to use accounting information in risk management in particular for risk identifcation, assessment and monitoring. The researchers use general scientifc methods of cognition such as systematic approach, logical generalization, legal and linguistic analysis, hypothesis. It is appropriate to identify the risks for all the levels of management and process. The processes at all levels are reflected in accounting. The idea is to extract the information necessary for business risk identifcation from the accounting data. The authors propose to use the Yuji Ijiri principle of triple accounting and to extend it to quadruple accounting. The proposed methodology is realized through automated information systems because the necessary detailing could be obtained by using computers. The main idea is that the change in capital is analyzed frst by changes in the balance sheet data and then by revenues and expenses. The results of calculations are presented in formats 1 and 2 accordingly. The results of capital factor analysis of capital due to changes in assets and liabilities are presented in format 3. The influence of changes of proft components on capital is presented in format 4. The results of the analysis are used to identify and make the primary assessment or risks. The proposed methodology of risk identifcation and their primary assessment makes it possible: 1. To use the data from accounting systems to identify business risks on systematic basis. 2. To ensure the comprehensive approach to risk identifcation. 3. To provide a mental representation of factors influencing the capital growth. С ростом экономики предприятия возникает потребность в использовании риск-ориентированного подхода ко многим процессам управления. Не является исключением и контроль. Контроль, основанный на риске, базируется на управлении рисками. Управление рисками означает их учет и анализ. Исследовать методические возможности использования бухгалтерской информации в целях управления рисками, в частности для их идентификации, оценки и мониторинга, представляется интересной методологической задачей. В работе использовались общенаучные методы познания: системный подход, логическое обобщение, правовой, лингвистический анализ, гипотеза. Риски целесообразно идентифицировать для каждого уровня управления и процесса. Процессы на всех уровнях находят свое отражение в учете. Идея заключается в том, чтобы из данных бухгалтерского учета извлечь необходимую информацию для опознания рисков бизнеса. Предлагается использовать принцип «тройной бухгалтерии» Юджи Идзири. При этом предлагается расширить его до квадро-учета. Предлагаемая методика реализуется в среде автоматизированных информационных систем, поскольку необходимую детализацию можно получить именно с использованием вычислительной техники. Суть заключается в том, что изменение капитала анализируется по изменению балансовых данных, а затем по доходам и расходам. Результаты расчетов представляются в форматах 1 и 2 соответственно. В формате 3 представляются результаты факторного анализа капитала за счет изменения имущества и обязательств, в формате 4 — влияния изменения составляющих прибыли на капитал. Результаты анализа используются для выявления и первичной оценки рисков. Предлагаемая методика выявления и первичной оценки рисков позволяет: 1. Использовать данные учетных систем на систематической основе для выявления рисков бизнеса. 2. Обеспечить сплошной подход к выявлению рисков. 3. Дает наглядное представление о факторах, влияющих на прирост капитала.

Suggested Citation

  • T. Serebryakova Yu. & O. Gordeeva G. & O. Kurtayeva Yu. & Т. Серебрякова Ю. & О. Гордеева Г. & О. Куртаева Ю., 2018. "Учетно-аналитические источники идентификации экономических рисков // Accounting and Analytical Sources of Economic Risks Identifcation," Учет. Анализ. Аудит // Accounting. Analysis. Auditing, ФГОБУВО "Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации" // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 5(5), pages 24-32.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:accntn:y:2018:i:5:p:24-32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://accounting.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/29/30.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sven Ove Hansson & Terje Aven, 2014. "Is Risk Analysis Scientific?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(7), pages 1173-1183, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Terje Aven, 2018. "An Emerging New Risk Analysis Science: Foundations and Implications," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 876-888, May.
    2. Aven, Terje, 2020. "Three influential risk foundation papers from the 80s and 90s: Are they still state-of-the-art?," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. Daniel J. Rozell, 2018. "The Ethical Foundations of Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(8), pages 1529-1533, August.
    4. Henrik Hassel & Alexander Cedergren, 2019. "Exploring the Conceptual Foundation of Continuity Management in the Context of Societal Safety," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(7), pages 1503-1519, July.
    5. repec:thr:techub:1007:y:2020:i:1:p:139-148 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Hamed Taherdoost, 2021. "A Review on Risk Management in Information Systems: Risk Policy, Control and Fraud Detection," Post-Print hal-03741848, HAL.
    7. Terje Aven, 2020. "Risk Science Contributions: Three Illustrating Examples," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(10), pages 1889-1899, October.
    8. Terje Aven, 2017. "What Defines Us as Professionals in the Field of Risk Analysis?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(5), pages 854-860, May.
    9. McDermott, T.K.J. & Surminski, S., 2018. "Normative interpretations of climate risk assessment and how it affects local decision making – a study at the city scale in Cork, Ireland," Working Papers 309607, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit.
    10. Aven, Terje, 2018. "Perspectives on the nexus between good risk communication and high scientific risk analysis quality," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 290-296.
    11. Torbjørn Bjerga & Terje Aven, 2016. "Some perspectives on risk management: A security case study from the oil and gas industry," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 230(5), pages 512-520, October.
    12. Jacob Taarup‐Esbensen, 2019. "Making Sense of Risk—A Sociological Perspective on the Management of Risk," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(4), pages 749-760, April.
    13. Floris Goerlandt & Jie Li & Genserik Reniers, 2020. "The Landscape of Risk Communication Research: A Scientometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-31, May.
    14. Rani Lill Anjum & Elena Rocca, 2019. "From Ideal to Real Risk: Philosophy of Causation Meets Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(3), pages 729-740, March.
    15. Aven, Terje, 2020. "Bayesian analysis: Critical issues related to its scope and boundaries in a risk context," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    16. Aven, Terje & Ylönen, Marja, 2019. "The strong power of standards in the safety and risk fields: A threat to proper developments of these fields?," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 279-286.
    17. Lorena Isabel Barona López & Ángel Leonardo Valdivieso Caraguay & Jorge Maestre Vidal & Marco Antonio Sotelo Monge & Luis Javier García Villalba, 2017. "Towards Incidence Management in 5G Based on Situational Awareness," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, January.
    18. Terje Aven, 2018. "Reflections on the Use of Conceptual Research in Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(11), pages 2415-2423, November.
    19. Antonio Nesticò & Shuquan He & Gianluigi De Mare & Renato Benintendi & Gabriella Maselli, 2018. "The ALARP Principle in the Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Acceptability of Investment Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Kateryna Horiachko, 2020. "Research of the impact of the terrorism and other factors on the consumers behavior," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 7(1), pages 139-148, May.
    21. Terje Aven & Roger Flage, 2020. "Foundational Challenges for Advancing the Field and Discipline of Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(S1), pages 2128-2136, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:accntn:y:2018:i:5:p:24-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://accounting.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.